Standardize "gpu_times" metric names and add GPU rasterization versions.

Standardize "gpu_times" metric names and add GPU rasterization versions.

The GPU Times metric event names have been standardized to match the
names for other metrics. GPU Rasterization versions have also been
added for both GPU times tests. Here is the list of test names:
  gpu_times.gpu_rasterization.key_mobile_sites_smooth
  gpu_times.gpu_rasterization.top_25_smooth
  gpu_times.key_mobile_sites_smooth
  gpu_times.top_25_smooth

R=vmiura@chromium.org
BUG=none
test=trybots

Committed: https://crrev.com/9fbe73b4158beb6beb278af819e075cc3d744210
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#313825}

[David Yen, 2015-01-28 22:50:20]

dyen@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ epenner@chromium.org

[David Yen, 2015-01-28 22:51:13]

On 2015/01/28 22:49:49, David Yen wrote:

The metrics seem to be running nicely, here is an example:

https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?masters=ChromiumPerf&bots=android-nexus...

This CL just adds GPU Rasterization versions and changes the names so they match
the standardized forms found in other tests.

[vmiura, 2015-01-29 01:26:55]

LGTM

https://codereview.chromium.org/875473003/diff/1/tools/perf/benchmarks/gpu_ti...
File tools/perf/benchmarks/gpu_times.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/875473003/diff/1/tools/perf/benchmarks/gpu_ti...
tools/perf/benchmarks/gpu_times.py:41: """Measures GPU timeline metric on key
mobile sites."""
nit: comment + "with GPU rasterization"

[David Yen, 2015-01-29 17:17:46]

https://codereview.chromium.org/875473003/diff/1/tools/perf/benchmarks/gpu_ti...
File tools/perf/benchmarks/gpu_times.py (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/875473003/diff/1/tools/perf/benchmarks/gpu_ti...
tools/perf/benchmarks/gpu_times.py:41: """Measures GPU timeline metric on key
mobile sites."""
On 2015/01/29 01:26:55, vmiura wrote:
> nit: comment + "with GPU rasterization"

Done.

[epennerAtGoogle, 2015-01-29 20:19:45]

LGTM

[David Yen, 2015-01-29 23:08:46]

On 2015/01/29 20:19:45, epennerAtGoogle wrote:
> LGTM

sorry, could you LGTM from your chromium account?

[epenner, 2015-01-29 23:20:35]

On 2015/01/29 23:08:46, David Yen wrote:
> On 2015/01/29 20:19:45, epennerAtGoogle wrote:
> > LGTM
> 
> sorry, could you LGTM from your chromium account?

When will I ever learn ;) LGTM.

[David Yen, 2015-01-29 23:24:10]

The CQ bit was checked by dyen@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-01-29 23:25:03]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/875473003/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-01-29 23:29:47]

Committed patchset #2 (id:20001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-01-29 23:32:06]

Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/9fbe73b4158beb6beb278af819e075cc3d744210
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#313825}

[oystein (OOO til 10th of July), 2015-02-02 21:34:02]

A revert of this CL (patchset #2 id:20001) has been created in
https://codereview.chromium.org/896593002/ by oysteine@chromium.org.

The reason for reverting is: Speculative revert for crbug.com/453131.