Updating usrsctp in DEPS to rev 9166.

Updating usrsctp in DEPS to rev 9166.

BUG=

Committed: https://crrev.com/59ed552cd82a2e827f673241bae8a45edc76e0df
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#317437}

[lally, 2015-02-20 15:42:08]

lally@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ juberti@chromium.org, pthatcher@chromium.org

[pthatcher1, 2015-02-20 16:17:06]

pthatcher@webrtc.org changed reviewers:
+ pthatcher@webrtc.org

[pthatcher1, 2015-02-20 16:17:07]

lgtm

[lally, 2015-02-20 18:36:23]

The CQ bit was checked by lally@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 18:38:11]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/873553004/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 18:38:14]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 18:38:15]

No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
_not_ a full super star committer.
See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

[Lally Singh, 2015-02-20 18:43:00]

lally@google.com changed reviewers:
+ lally@google.com

[Lally Singh, 2015-02-20 18:43:15]

On 2015/02/20 18:38:15, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
> Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
> _not_ a full super star committer.
> See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
> Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

lgtm

[Lally Singh, 2015-02-20 18:43:19]

The CQ bit was checked by lally@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 18:43:51]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/873553004/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 18:43:54]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 18:43:55]

No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
_not_ a full super star committer.
See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

[chromium-reviews, 2015-02-20 20:47:50]

Ping -- anyone mind lgtm'ing from a committer account?


Cheers,
$ ls

Lally Singh | Google Ideas <http://www.google.com/ideas/> | Engineering |
lally@google.com


On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:43 PM, <commit-bot@chromium.org> wrote:

> No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
> Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
> _not_ a full super star committer.
> See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
> Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
>
> https://codereview.chromium.org/873553004/
>

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.

[juberti2, 2015-02-20 21:40:54]

juberti@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ jiayl@chromium.org

[juberti2, 2015-02-20 21:41:26]

On 2015/02/20 20:47:50, chromium-reviews wrote:
> Ping -- anyone mind lgtm'ing from a committer account?
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> $ ls
> 
> Lally Singh | Google Ideas <http://www.google.com/ideas/> | Engineering |
> mailto:lally@google.com
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:43 PM, <mailto:commit-bot@chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> > No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
> > Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
> > _not_ a full super star committer.
> > See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
> > Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
> >
> > https://codereview.chromium.org/873553004/
> >
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email
> to mailto:chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.

+jiayl who can commit

Is there a reason hashes other than the usrsctp hash changed?

[Lally Singh, 2015-02-20 21:44:04]

On 2015/02/20 21:41:26, juberti2 wrote:
> On 2015/02/20 20:47:50, chromium-reviews wrote:
> > Ping -- anyone mind lgtm'ing from a committer account?
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > $ ls
> > 
> > Lally Singh | Google Ideas <http://www.google.com/ideas/> | Engineering |
> > mailto:lally@google.com
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:43 PM, <mailto:commit-bot@chromium.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
> > > Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
> > > _not_ a full super star committer.
> > > See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
> > > Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
> > >
> > > https://codereview.chromium.org/873553004/
> > >
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email
> > to mailto:chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
> 
> +jiayl who can commit
> 
> Is there a reason hashes other than the usrsctp hash changed?

The DEPS in Patch Set 2 is based on a newer DEPS than the one in Patch Set 1. 
The side-by-side diffs show just 1 line changing.

[jiayl, 2015-02-20 22:32:20]

On 2015/02/20 21:44:04, Lally Singh wrote:
> On 2015/02/20 21:41:26, juberti2 wrote:
> > On 2015/02/20 20:47:50, chromium-reviews wrote:
> > > Ping -- anyone mind lgtm'ing from a committer account?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > $ ls
> > > 
> > > Lally Singh | Google Ideas <http://www.google.com/ideas/> | Engineering |
> > > mailto:lally@google.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:43 PM, <mailto:commit-bot@chromium.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
> > > > Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
> > > > _not_ a full super star committer.
> > > > See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
> > > > Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
> > > >
> > > > https://codereview.chromium.org/873553004/
> > > >
> > > 
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email
> > > to mailto:chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
> > 
> > +jiayl who can commit
> > 
> > Is there a reason hashes other than the usrsctp hash changed?
> 
> The DEPS in Patch Set 2 is based on a newer DEPS than the one in Patch Set 1. 
> The side-by-side diffs show just 1 line changing.

You can land from the web UI by checking the "commit queue".

[Lally Singh, 2015-02-20 22:32:48]

The CQ bit was checked by lally@google.com

[Lally Singh, 2015-02-20 22:33:06]

On 2015/02/20 22:32:20, jiayl wrote:
> On 2015/02/20 21:44:04, Lally Singh wrote:
> > On 2015/02/20 21:41:26, juberti2 wrote:
> > > On 2015/02/20 20:47:50, chromium-reviews wrote:
> > > > Ping -- anyone mind lgtm'ing from a committer account?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > $ ls
> > > > 
> > > > Lally Singh | Google Ideas <http://www.google.com/ideas/> | Engineering
|
> > > > mailto:lally@google.com
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:43 PM, <mailto:commit-bot@chromium.org> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
> > > > > Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
> > > > > _not_ a full super star committer.
> > > > > See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
> > > > > Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://codereview.chromium.org/873553004/
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
> > > email
> > > > to mailto:chromium-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
> > > 
> > > +jiayl who can commit
> > > 
> > > Is there a reason hashes other than the usrsctp hash changed?
> > 
> > The DEPS in Patch Set 2 is based on a newer DEPS than the one in Patch Set
1. 
> > The side-by-side diffs show just 1 line changing.
> 
> You can land from the web UI by checking the "commit queue".

That's what I did.

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 22:33:42]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/873553004/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 22:33:47]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 22:33:48]

No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer,
_not_ a full super star committer.
See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

[jiayl, 2015-02-20 22:34:36]

lgtm

[jiayl, 2015-02-20 22:34:40]

The CQ bit was checked by jiayl@chromium.org

[lally, 2015-02-20 22:35:10]

The CQ bit was unchecked by lally@chromium.org

[lally, 2015-02-20 22:35:10]

The CQ bit was checked by lally@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 22:35:31]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/873553004/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 23:32:23]

Committed patchset #2 (id:20001)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2015-02-20 23:33:14]

Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/59ed552cd82a2e827f673241bae8a45edc76e0df
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#317437}