[Android] Revised initial commit of the HttpTestServer. (abandoned)

[Android] Revised initial commit of the HttpTestServer.

This still contains only the DefaultResponseHandler.

BUG=448626

[jbudorick, 2015-02-10 19:11:24]

jbudorick@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ phajdan.jr@chromium.org

[jbudorick, 2015-02-11 16:43:47]

jbudorick@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ rsleevi@chromium.org

[jbudorick, 2015-02-11 16:43:48]

+rsleevi

I'm not sure if you're the right person to review this (after phajdan, who is
out and has suggested people find other reviewers). Let me know if that's the
case and I'll look for someone else.

[Ryan Sleevi, 2015-02-11 16:48:09]

You picked the right person, but I'm trying to push people in the exact opposite
of this direction (see
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=456210 )

We should chat more so I can understand.

[jbudorick, 2015-02-11 16:54:33]

On 2015/02/11 16:48:09, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> You picked the right person, but I'm trying to push people in the exact
opposite
> of this direction (see
> https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=456210 )
> 
> We should chat more so I can understand.

FWIW, this is designed to be the test server spawned by SpawnedTestServer
(replacing testserver.py for Android tests, so that we don't have to connect
back to the host via the forwarder). More context from the first CL in this
sequence: https://codereview.chromium.org/867073002/

Happy to chat, though.

[Ryan Sleevi, 2015-02-11 17:04:28]

On 2015/02/11 16:54:33, jbudorick wrote:
> On 2015/02/11 16:48:09, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> > You picked the right person, but I'm trying to push people in the exact
> opposite
> > of this direction (see
> > https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=456210 )
> > 
> > We should chat more so I can understand.
> 
> FWIW, this is designed to be the test server spawned by SpawnedTestServer
> (replacing testserver.py for Android tests, so that we don't have to connect
> back to the host via the forwarder).

Right. I consider this goal a bad thing from the POV of //net, but I'm operating
on incomplete data (since no one I talked to brought up the use case on the bug)

We need to chat, because as is, I'm deeply concerned that this approach in the
CLs and bug is wrong. But I may also be mistaken.

> More context from the first CL in this
> sequence: https://codereview.chromium.org/867073002/
> 
> Happy to chat, though.