| Index: net/docs/bug-triage-suggested-workflow.txt
|
| diff --git a/net/docs/bug-triage-suggested-workflow.txt b/net/docs/bug-triage-suggested-workflow.txt
|
| index c54e912695a9d162522986b2e387f1c2b6e9b012..f605c4354f785cf7143b2816af9431cbcc9b21f1 100644
|
| --- a/net/docs/bug-triage-suggested-workflow.txt
|
| +++ b/net/docs/bug-triage-suggested-workflow.txt
|
| @@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ Identifying unlabeled network bugs on the tracker:
|
| * If non-network causes also seem possible, attach those labels as well.
|
|
|
| Investigating Cr-Internals-Network bugs:
|
| +* It's recommended that while on triage duty, you subscribe to the
|
| + Cr-Internals-Network label. To do this, go to
|
| + https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/ and click on "Subscriptions".
|
| + Enter Cr-Internals-Network and click submit.
|
| * Look through uncomfirmed and untriaged Cr-Internals-Network bugs, prioritizing
|
| those updated within the last week:
|
| https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list?can=2&q=Cr%3DInternals-Network+-status%3AAssigned+-status%3AStarted+-status%3AAvailable+&sort=-modified
|
| @@ -59,6 +63,9 @@ Investigating Cr-Internals-Network bugs:
|
| Can just grab the link from about:net-internals, as needed.
|
| * Try to figure out what's going on, and which more specific network label is
|
| most appropriate.
|
| +* If it's a regression, browse through the git history of relevant files to try
|
| + and figure out when it regressed. CC authors / primary reviewers of any
|
| + strongly suspect CLs.
|
| * If you are having trouble with an issue, particularly for help understanding
|
| net-internals logs, email the public net-dev@chromium.org list for help
|
| debugging. If it's a crasher, or for some other reason discussion needs to
|
| @@ -85,7 +92,8 @@ Look for new crashers:
|
|
|
| Investigating crashers:
|
| * Only investigate crashers that are still occurring, as identified by above
|
| - section.
|
| + section. If a search on go/crash indicates a crasher is no longer
|
| + occurring, mark it as WontFix.
|
| * Particularly for Windows, look for weird dlls associated with the crashes.
|
| If there are some, it may be caused by malware. You can often figure out if
|
| a dll is malware by a search, though it's harder to figure out if a dll is
|
| @@ -103,14 +111,16 @@ Investigating crashers:
|
|
|
| Dealing with old bugs:
|
| * For all network issues (Even those with owners, or a more specific labels):
|
| - * If the issue has had the Needs-Feedback label for over two weeks, verify it
|
| + * If the issue has had the Needs-Feedback label for over a month, verify it
|
| is waiting on feedback from the user. If not, remove the label.
|
| Otherwise, go ahead and mark the issue WontFix due to lack of response and
|
| suggest the user file a new bug if the issue is still present.
|
| - Needs-feedback issues: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list?can=2&q=Cr=Internals-Network%20Needs=Feedback&sort=modified
|
| - * If a bug is over 2 months old, and the underlying problem was never really
|
| - understood, ask reporters if the issue is still present, and attach the
|
| - Needs-Feedback label.
|
| + Old Needs-Feedback issues: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list?can=2&q=Cr%3AInternals-Network%20Needs=Feedback+modified-before%3Atoday-30&sort=-modified
|
| + * If a bug is over 2 months old, and the underlying problem was never
|
| + reproduced or really understood:
|
| + * If it's over a year old, go ahead and mark the issue as Archived.
|
| + * Otherwise, ask reporters if the issue is still present, and attach the
|
| + Needs-Feedback label.
|
| * Old unconfirmed or untriaged Cr-Internals-Network issues can be investigated
|
| just like newer ones. Crashers should generally be given higher priority,
|
| since we can verify if they still occur, and then newer issues, as they're
|
|
|