Update from https://crrev.com/312398

net/docs/bug-triage-suggested-workflow.txt

 Identifying unlabeled network bugs on the tracker:
 * Look at new uncomfirmed bugs since noon PST on the last triager's rotation:
     https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list?can=2&q=status%3Aunconfirmed&sort=-id&num=1000
 * Press "h" to bring up a preview of the bug text.
 * Use "j" and "k" to advance through bugs.
 * If a bug looks like it might be network/download/safe-browsing related, middle
     click [or command-click on OSX] to open in new tab.
 * If a user provides a crash ID for a crasher for a bug that could be
     net-related, look at the crash stack at go/crash, and see if it looks to be
     network related.  Be sure to check if other bug reports have that stack
     trace, and mark as a dupe if so.  Even if the bug isn't network related,
     paste the stack trace in the bug, so no one else has to look up the crash
     stack from the ID.
   * If there's no other information than the crash ID, ask for more details and
       add the Needs-Feedback label.
 * If network causes are possible, ask for a net-internals log (If it's not a
     browser crash) and attach the most specific internals-network label that's
     applicable.  If there isn't an applicable narrower label, a clear owner for
     the issue, or there are multiple possibilities, attach the internals-network
     label and proceed with further investigation.
 * If non-network causes also seem possible, attach those labels as well.
 
 Investigating Cr-Internals-Network bugs:
+* It's recommended that while on triage duty, you subscribe to the
+    Cr-Internals-Network label.  To do this, go to
+    https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/ and click on "Subscriptions".
+    Enter Cr-Internals-Network and click submit.
 * Look through uncomfirmed and untriaged Cr-Internals-Network bugs, prioritizing
     those updated within the last week:
     https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list?can=2&q=Cr%3DInternals-Network+-status%3AAssigned+-status%3AStarted+-status%3AAvailable+&sort=-modified
 * While investigating a new issue, change the status to Untriaged.
 * If a bug is a potential security issue (Allows for code execution from remote
     site, allows crossing security boundaries, unchecked array bounds, etc) mark
     it Type-Bug-Security.  If it has privacy implication (History, cookies
     discoverable by an entity that shouldn't be able to do so, incognito state
     being saved in memory or on disk beyond the lifetime of incognito tabs,
     etc), mark it Cr-Privacy.
@@ skipping 18 matching lines @@
       respond with more information, and remove it when not waiting on the user.
   * Try to reproduce locally.  If you can, and it's a regression, use
       src/tools/bisect-builds.py to figure out when it regressed.
   * Ask more data from the user as needed (net-internals dumps, repro case,
       crash ID from about:crashes, run tests, etc).
   * If asking for an about:net-internals dump, provide this link:
       https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/for-testers/providing-network-details.
       Can just grab the link from about:net-internals, as needed.
 * Try to figure out what's going on, and which more specific network label is
     most appropriate.
+* If it's a regression, browse through the git history of relevant files to try
+    and figure out when it regressed.  CC authors / primary reviewers of any
+    strongly suspect CLs.
 * If you are having trouble with an issue, particularly for help understanding
     net-internals logs, email the public net-dev@chromium.org list for help
     debugging.  If it's a crasher, or for some other reason discussion needs to
     be done in private, use chrome-network-debugging@google.com.
     TODO(mmenke): Write up a net-internals tips and tricks docs.
 * If it appears to be a bug in the unowned core of the network stack (i.e. no
     sublabel applies, or only the Cr-Internals-Network-HTTP sublabel applies,
     and there's no clear owner), try to figure out the exact cause.
 
 Look for new crashers:
 * Go to go/chromecrash.
 * For each platform, go to the latest canary.  Click on browser -> limit 1000.
     Search the page for "net::".  Ignore crashes that only occur once, as
     memory corruption can easily cause one-off failures when the sample size is
     large enough.
   * Look at the stack trace to confirm it's a network bug.
   * If it is, and there's no associated bug filed, file a new bug directly from
       chromecrash, looking at earlier canaries to determine if it's a recent
       regression.  Use the most specific label possible.
 * The most recent Canary may not yet have a full day of crashes, so it may be
     worth looking at more than one version.
 * If there's been a dev, beta, or stable release in the last couple days, should
     also look at those.
 
 Investigating crashers:
 * Only investigate crashers that are still occurring, as identified by above
-    section.
+    section.  If a search on go/crash indicates a crasher is no longer
+    occurring, mark it as WontFix.
 * Particularly for Windows, look for weird dlls associated with the crashes.
     If there are some, it may be caused by malware.  You can often figure out if
     a dll is malware by a search, though it's harder to figure out if a dll is
     definitively not malware.
 * See if the same users are repeatedly running into the same issue.  This can be
     accomplished by search for (Or clicking on) the client ID associated with a
     crash report, and seeing if there are multiple reports for the same crash.
     If this is the case, it may be also be malware, or an issue with an unusual
     system/chrome/network config.
 * Dig through crash reports to figure out when the crash first appeared, and dig
     through revision history in related files to try and locate a suspect CL.
     TODO(mmenke):  Add more detail here.
 * Load crash dumps, try to figure out a cause.
     See http://www.chromium.org/developers/crash-reports for more information
 
 Dealing with old bugs:
 * For all network issues (Even those with owners, or a more specific labels):
-  * If the issue has had the Needs-Feedback label for over two weeks, verify it
+  * If the issue has had the Needs-Feedback label for over a month, verify it
       is waiting on feedback from the user.  If not, remove the label.
       Otherwise, go ahead and mark the issue WontFix due to lack of response and
       suggest the user file a new bug if the issue is still present.
-      Needs-feedback issues:  https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list?can=2&q=Cr=Internals-Network%20Needs=Feedback&sort=modified
-  * If a bug is over 2 months old, and the underlying problem was never really
-    understood, ask reporters if the issue is still present, and attach the
-    Needs-Feedback label.
+      Old Needs-Feedback issues:  https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list?can=2&q=Cr%3AInternals-Network%20Needs=Feedback+modified-before%3Atoday-30&sort=-modified
+  * If a bug is over 2 months old, and the underlying problem was never
+    reproduced or really understood:
+    * If it's over a year old, go ahead and mark the issue as Archived.
+    * Otherwise, ask reporters if the issue is still present, and attach the
+        Needs-Feedback label.
 * Old unconfirmed or untriaged Cr-Internals-Network issues can be investigated
     just like newer ones.  Crashers should generally be given higher priority,
     since we can verify if they still occur, and then newer issues, as they're
     more likely to still be present, and more likely to have a still responsive
     bug reporter.