Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(91)

Side by Side Diff: content/child/webcrypto/openssl/ec_algorithm_openssl.cc

Issue 839653002: Throw a DataError rather than OperationError in some cases when importing invalid EC key. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@pkcs_export
Patch Set: undo the jwk optimization and just check_key() always Created 5 years, 10 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | content/test/data/webcrypto/bad_ec_keys.json » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
1 // Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. 1 // Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be 2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
3 // found in the LICENSE file. 3 // found in the LICENSE file.
4 4
5 #include "content/child/webcrypto/openssl/ec_algorithm_openssl.h" 5 #include "content/child/webcrypto/openssl/ec_algorithm_openssl.h"
6 6
7 #include <openssl/ec.h> 7 #include <openssl/ec.h>
8 #include <openssl/ec_key.h> 8 #include <openssl/ec_key.h>
9 #include <openssl/evp.h> 9 #include <openssl/evp.h>
10 #include <openssl/pkcs12.h> 10 #include <openssl/pkcs12.h>
(...skipping 105 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
116 return Status::ErrorUnexpected(); 116 return Status::ErrorUnexpected();
117 117
118 // When importing an ECPrivateKey, the public key is optional. If it was 118 // When importing an ECPrivateKey, the public key is optional. If it was
119 // omitted then the public key will be calculated by BoringSSL and added into 119 // omitted then the public key will be calculated by BoringSSL and added into
120 // the EC_KEY. However an encoding flag is set such that when exporting to 120 // the EC_KEY. However an encoding flag is set such that when exporting to
121 // PKCS8 format the public key is once again omitted. Remove this flag. 121 // PKCS8 format the public key is once again omitted. Remove this flag.
122 unsigned int enc_flags = EC_KEY_get_enc_flags(ec.get()); 122 unsigned int enc_flags = EC_KEY_get_enc_flags(ec.get());
123 enc_flags &= ~EC_PKEY_NO_PUBKEY; 123 enc_flags &= ~EC_PKEY_NO_PUBKEY;
124 EC_KEY_set_enc_flags(ec.get(), enc_flags); 124 EC_KEY_set_enc_flags(ec.get(), enc_flags);
125 125
126 // TODO(eroman): Is this necessary? From my tests it seems that BoringSSL
127 // already does these checks when setting the public key's affine coordinates.
128 if (!EC_KEY_check_key(ec.get())) 126 if (!EC_KEY_check_key(ec.get()))
129 return Status::ErrorEcKeyInvalid(); 127 return Status::ErrorEcKeyInvalid();
130 128
131 // Make sure the curve matches the expected curve name. 129 // Make sure the curve matches the expected curve name.
132 int curve_nid = EC_GROUP_get_curve_name(EC_KEY_get0_group(ec.get())); 130 int curve_nid = EC_GROUP_get_curve_name(EC_KEY_get0_group(ec.get()));
133 blink::WebCryptoNamedCurve named_curve = blink::WebCryptoNamedCurveP256; 131 blink::WebCryptoNamedCurve named_curve = blink::WebCryptoNamedCurveP256;
134 Status status = NidToWebCryptoCurve(curve_nid, &named_curve); 132 Status status = NidToWebCryptoCurve(curve_nid, &named_curve);
135 if (status.IsError()) 133 if (status.IsError())
136 return status; 134 return status;
137 135
(...skipping 262 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
400 crypto::ScopedBIGNUM x; 398 crypto::ScopedBIGNUM x;
401 status = ReadPaddedBIGNUM(jwk, "x", degree_bytes, &x); 399 status = ReadPaddedBIGNUM(jwk, "x", degree_bytes, &x);
402 if (status.IsError()) 400 if (status.IsError())
403 return status; 401 return status;
404 402
405 crypto::ScopedBIGNUM y; 403 crypto::ScopedBIGNUM y;
406 status = ReadPaddedBIGNUM(jwk, "y", degree_bytes, &y); 404 status = ReadPaddedBIGNUM(jwk, "y", degree_bytes, &y);
407 if (status.IsError()) 405 if (status.IsError())
408 return status; 406 return status;
409 407
410 // TODO(eroman): This internally runs EC_KEY_check_key(). Can avoid calling it 408 // TODO(eroman): Distinguish more accurately between a DataError and
411 // again by the JWK import code if private key were set before public key. 409 // OperationError. In general if this fails it was due to the key being an
410 // invalid EC key.
412 if (!EC_KEY_set_public_key_affine_coordinates(ec.get(), x.get(), y.get())) 411 if (!EC_KEY_set_public_key_affine_coordinates(ec.get(), x.get(), y.get()))
413 return Status::OperationError(); 412 return Status::DataError();
414 413
415 // Extract the "d" parameters. 414 // Extract the "d" parameters.
416 if (is_private_key) { 415 if (is_private_key) {
417 crypto::ScopedBIGNUM d; 416 crypto::ScopedBIGNUM d;
418 status = ReadPaddedBIGNUM(jwk, "d", degree_bytes, &d); 417 status = ReadPaddedBIGNUM(jwk, "d", degree_bytes, &d);
419 if (status.IsError()) 418 if (status.IsError())
420 return status; 419 return status;
421 420
422 if (!EC_KEY_set_private_key(ec.get(), d.get())) 421 if (!EC_KEY_set_private_key(ec.get(), d.get()))
423 return Status::OperationError(); 422 return Status::OperationError();
(...skipping 136 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
560 key->algorithm().ecParams()->namedCurve()) { 559 key->algorithm().ecParams()->namedCurve()) {
561 return Status::ErrorUnexpected(); 560 return Status::ErrorUnexpected();
562 } 561 }
563 562
564 return Status::Success(); 563 return Status::Success();
565 } 564 }
566 565
567 } // namespace webcrypto 566 } // namespace webcrypto
568 567
569 } // namespace content 568 } // namespace content
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | content/test/data/webcrypto/bad_ec_keys.json » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698