chrome/browser/profiles/profile_manager_unittest.cc - Issue 839193002: Move ServiceAccessType into //components/keyed_service

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/profiles/profile_manager_unittest.cc

Issue 839193002: Move ServiceAccessType into //components/keyed_service (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master

Patch Set: Fix compilation on android Created 5 years, 11 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

View side-by-side diff with in-line comments

Download patch

« no previous file with comments | « chrome/browser/profiles/profile_manager_browsertest.cc ('k') | chrome/browser/safe_browsing/browser_feature_extractor.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Hide Comments ('s')

Index: chrome/browser/profiles/profile_manager_unittest.cc

diff --git a/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_manager_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_manager_unittest.cc

index c3ffe9e19df34f7500ef2636eb9d7708136a7daf..c05da3b9a20af07c602e1efd2185ba752fd62f75 100644

--- a/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_manager_unittest.cc

+++ b/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_manager_unittest.cc

@@ -263,15 +263,15 @@ TEST_F(ProfileManagerTest, CreateAndUseTwoProfiles) {

// Force lazy-init of some profile services to simulate use.

ASSERT_TRUE(profile1->CreateHistoryService(true, false));

- EXPECT_TRUE(HistoryServiceFactory::GetForProfile(profile1,

- Profile::EXPLICIT_ACCESS));

+ EXPECT_TRUE(HistoryServiceFactory::GetForProfile(

+ profile1, ServiceAccessType::EXPLICIT_ACCESS));

profile1->CreateBookmarkModel(true);

EXPECT_TRUE(BookmarkModelFactory::GetForProfile(profile1));

profile2->CreateBookmarkModel(true);

EXPECT_TRUE(BookmarkModelFactory::GetForProfile(profile2));

ASSERT_TRUE(profile2->CreateHistoryService(true, false));

- EXPECT_TRUE(HistoryServiceFactory::GetForProfile(profile2,

- Profile::EXPLICIT_ACCESS));

+ EXPECT_TRUE(HistoryServiceFactory::GetForProfile(

+ profile2, ServiceAccessType::EXPLICIT_ACCESS));

// Make sure any pending tasks run before we destroy the profiles.

base::RunLoop().RunUntilIdle();