OLD | NEW |
(Empty) | |
| 1 # Copyright 2015 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. |
| 2 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be |
| 3 # found in the LICENSE file. |
| 4 |
| 5 import unittest |
| 6 |
| 7 from common.diff import ChangeType |
| 8 from waterfall import build_failure_analysis |
| 9 from waterfall.failure_signal import FailureSignal |
| 10 |
| 11 |
| 12 class BuildFailureAnalysisTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| 13 |
| 14 def testIsSameFile(self): |
| 15 self.assertTrue(build_failure_analysis._IsSameFile('a/b/x.cc', 'x.cc')) |
| 16 self.assertFalse(build_failure_analysis._IsSameFile('a/pre_x.cc.', 'x.cc')) |
| 17 self.assertFalse(build_failure_analysis._IsSameFile('a/x.cc.', 'a/y.cc')) |
| 18 |
| 19 def testNormalizeObjectFile(self): |
| 20 cases = { |
| 21 'obj/a/T.x.o': 'a/x.o', |
| 22 'obj/a/T.x.y.o': 'a/x.y.o', |
| 23 'x.o': 'x.o' |
| 24 } |
| 25 for obj_file, expected_file in cases.iteritems(): |
| 26 self.assertEqual( |
| 27 expected_file, |
| 28 build_failure_analysis._NormalizeObjectFile(obj_file)) |
| 29 |
| 30 def testStripCommonPostfix(self): |
| 31 cases = { |
| 32 'a_file': |
| 33 'a_file_%s.cc' % '_'.join(build_failure_analysis._COMMON_SUFFIXES), |
| 34 'src/b_file': 'src/b_file_impl_mac.h', |
| 35 'c_file': 'c_file_browsertest.cc' |
| 36 } |
| 37 for expected_file, file_path in cases.iteritems(): |
| 38 self.assertEqual( |
| 39 expected_file, |
| 40 build_failure_analysis._StripExtensionAndCommonPostfix(file_path)) |
| 41 |
| 42 def testIsCorrelated(self): |
| 43 self.assertTrue(build_failure_analysis._IsCorrelated('a.py', 'a_test.py')) |
| 44 self.assertTrue( |
| 45 build_failure_analysis._IsCorrelated('a.h', 'a_impl_test.o')) |
| 46 self.assertTrue( |
| 47 build_failure_analysis._IsCorrelated('a/b/x.cc', 'a/b/y.cc')) |
| 48 |
| 49 self.assertFalse( |
| 50 build_failure_analysis._IsCorrelated('a/x.cc', 'a/b/y.cc')) |
| 51 |
| 52 def testCheckFilesAgainstSuspectedCL(self): |
| 53 failure_signal_json = { |
| 54 'files': { |
| 55 'src/a/b/f1.cc': [], |
| 56 'b/c/f2.h': [10, 20], |
| 57 'd/e/f3_test.cc': [], |
| 58 'x/y/f4.py': [], |
| 59 'f5_impl.cc': [] |
| 60 } |
| 61 } |
| 62 change_log_json = { |
| 63 'touched_files': [ |
| 64 { |
| 65 'change_type': ChangeType.ADD, |
| 66 'old_path': '/dev/null', |
| 67 'new_path': 'a/b/f1.cc' |
| 68 }, |
| 69 { |
| 70 'change_type': ChangeType.MODIFY, |
| 71 'old_path': 'a/b/c/f2.h', |
| 72 'new_path': 'a/b/c/f2.h' |
| 73 }, |
| 74 { |
| 75 'change_type': ChangeType.MODIFY, |
| 76 'old_path': 'd/e/f3.h', |
| 77 'new_path': 'd/e/f3.h' |
| 78 }, |
| 79 { |
| 80 'change_type': ChangeType.DELETE, |
| 81 'old_path': 'x/y/f4.py', |
| 82 'new_path': '/dev/null' |
| 83 }, |
| 84 { |
| 85 'change_type': ChangeType.DELETE, |
| 86 'old_path': 'h/f5.h', |
| 87 'new_path': '/dev/null' |
| 88 }, |
| 89 { |
| 90 'change_type': ChangeType.RENAME, |
| 91 'old_path': 't/y/x.cc', |
| 92 'new_path': 's/z/x.cc' |
| 93 }, |
| 94 ] |
| 95 } |
| 96 |
| 97 justification = build_failure_analysis.CheckFiles( |
| 98 FailureSignal.FromJson(failure_signal_json), change_log_json) |
| 99 self.assertIsNotNone(justification) |
| 100 self.assertEqual(2, justification['suspects']) |
| 101 self.assertEqual(13, justification['scores']) |
| 102 |
| 103 def testCheckFilesAgainstUnrelatedCL(self): |
| 104 failure_signal_json = { |
| 105 'files': { |
| 106 'src/a/b/f.cc': [], |
| 107 } |
| 108 } |
| 109 change_log_json = { |
| 110 'touched_files': [ |
| 111 { |
| 112 'change_type': ChangeType.ADD, |
| 113 'old_path': '/dev/null', |
| 114 'new_path': 'a/d/f1.cc' |
| 115 }, |
| 116 ] |
| 117 } |
| 118 |
| 119 justification = build_failure_analysis.CheckFiles( |
| 120 FailureSignal.FromJson(failure_signal_json), change_log_json) |
| 121 self.assertIsNone(justification) |
| 122 |
| 123 def testAnalyzeSuccesfulBuild(self): |
| 124 failure_info = { |
| 125 'failed': False, |
| 126 } |
| 127 result = build_failure_analysis.AnalyzeBuildFailure( |
| 128 failure_info, None, None) |
| 129 self.assertEqual(0, len(result)) |
| 130 |
| 131 def testAnalyzeBuildFailure(self): |
| 132 failure_info = { |
| 133 'failed': True, |
| 134 'failed_steps': { |
| 135 'a': { |
| 136 'current_failure': 99, |
| 137 'first_failure': 98, |
| 138 }, |
| 139 'b': { |
| 140 'current_failure': 99, |
| 141 'first_failure': 98, |
| 142 }, |
| 143 }, |
| 144 'builds': { |
| 145 '99': { |
| 146 'blame_list': ['r99_1', 'r99_2'], |
| 147 }, |
| 148 '98': { |
| 149 'blame_list': ['r98_1'], |
| 150 }, |
| 151 } |
| 152 } |
| 153 change_logs = { |
| 154 'r99_1': { |
| 155 'touched_files': [ |
| 156 { |
| 157 'change_type': ChangeType.ADD, |
| 158 'old_path': '/dev/null', |
| 159 'new_path': 'x/y/f99_1.cc' |
| 160 }, |
| 161 ], |
| 162 }, |
| 163 'r99_2': { |
| 164 'touched_files': [ |
| 165 { |
| 166 'change_type': ChangeType.MODIFY, |
| 167 'old_path': 'a/b/f99_2.cc', |
| 168 'new_path': 'a/b/f99_2.cc' |
| 169 }, |
| 170 ], |
| 171 }, |
| 172 'r98_1': { |
| 173 'touched_files': [ |
| 174 { |
| 175 'change_type': ChangeType.MODIFY, |
| 176 'old_path': 'y/z/f98.cc', |
| 177 'new_path': 'y/z/f98.cc' |
| 178 }, |
| 179 ], |
| 180 }, |
| 181 } |
| 182 failure_signals_json = { |
| 183 'a': { |
| 184 'files': { |
| 185 'src/a/b/f99_2.cc': [], |
| 186 }, |
| 187 }, |
| 188 'b': { |
| 189 'files': { |
| 190 'f.cc': [], |
| 191 }, |
| 192 }, |
| 193 } |
| 194 expected_analysis_result = { |
| 195 'a': { |
| 196 'r99_2': { |
| 197 'suspects': 0, |
| 198 'scores': 1, |
| 199 'hints': [ |
| 200 'modify a/b/f99_2.cc', |
| 201 ] |
| 202 }, |
| 203 }, |
| 204 } |
| 205 |
| 206 analysis_result = build_failure_analysis.AnalyzeBuildFailure( |
| 207 failure_info, change_logs, failure_signals_json) |
| 208 self.assertEqual(expected_analysis_result, analysis_result) |
OLD | NEW |