Add a content::GetUserAgent() to wrap webkit_glue::GetUserAgent()

Add a content::GetUserAgent() to wrap webkit_glue::GetUserAgent(), so
that we get the glue statics linked into content.dll when we enable
the content component build.

R=jam@chromium.org
BUG=90422
TEST=

Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=105203

[jam, 2011-10-11 19:32:37]

lgtm

[Peter Kasting, 2011-10-11 20:07:36]

http://codereview.chromium.org/8234013/diff/1/content/common/content_client.h
File content/common/content_client.h (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/8234013/diff/1/content/common/content_client.h...
content/common/content_client.h:50: // consistent.
Nit: "things are consistent" is pretty vague... it might be nice to be a little
clearer here about precisely what could go wrong when.

[Dirk Pranke, 2011-10-11 23:03:16]

Mattias, can I get an owner review for the chrome/browser/policy change? 

Will, can I get an owner review for the chrome/browser/net change?

Fred, can I get one for the chrome/browser/sync changes?

http://codereview.chromium.org/8234013/diff/1/content/common/content_client.h
File content/common/content_client.h (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/8234013/diff/1/content/common/content_client.h...
content/common/content_client.h:50: // consistent.
On 2011/10/11 20:07:36, Peter Kasting wrote:
> Nit: "things are consistent" is pretty vague... it might be nice to be a
little
> clearer here about precisely what could go wrong when.

Done.

[akalin, 2011-10-11 23:05:48]

sync LGTM

On 2011/10/11 23:03:16, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> Mattias, can I get an owner review for the chrome/browser/policy change? 
> 
> Will, can I get an owner review for the chrome/browser/net change?
> 
> Fred, can I get one for the chrome/browser/sync changes?
> 
> http://codereview.chromium.org/8234013/diff/1/content/common/content_client.h
> File content/common/content_client.h (right):
> 
>
http://codereview.chromium.org/8234013/diff/1/content/common/content_client.h...
> content/common/content_client.h:50: // consistent.
> On 2011/10/11 20:07:36, Peter Kasting wrote:
> > Nit: "things are consistent" is pretty vague... it might be nice to be a
> little
> > clearer here about precisely what could go wrong when.
> 
> Done.

[willchan no longer on Chromium, 2011-10-12 00:12:07]

LGTM

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:05 PM, <akalin@chromium.org> wrote:

> sync LGTM
>
>
> On 2011/10/11 23:03:16, Dirk Pranke wrote:
>
>> Mattias, can I get an owner review for the chrome/browser/policy change?
>>
>
>  Will, can I get an owner review for the chrome/browser/net change?
>>
>
>  Fred, can I get one for the chrome/browser/sync changes?
>>
>
>  http://codereview.chromium.**org/8234013/diff/1/content/**
>>
common/content_client.h<http://codereview.chromium.org/8234013/diff/1/content/common/content_client.h>
>> File content/common/content_client.**h (right):
>>
>
>
> http://codereview.chromium.**org/8234013/diff/1/content/**
>
common/content_client.h#**newcode50<http://codereview.chromium.org/8234013/diff/1/content/common/content_client.h#newcode50>
>
>> content/common/content_client.**h:50: // consistent.
>> On 2011/10/11 20:07:36, Peter Kasting wrote:
>> > Nit: "things are consistent" is pretty vague... it might be nice to be a
>> little
>> > clearer here about precisely what could go wrong when.
>>
>
>  Done.
>>
>
>
>
>
http://codereview.chromium.**org/8234013/<http://codereview.chromium.org/8234...
>

[Mattias Nissler (ping if slow), 2011-10-12 09:03:06]

chrome/browser/policy LGTM