Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(520)

Unified Diff: observatory_pub_packages/observe/src/observable_map.dart

Issue 816693004: Add observatory_pub_packages snapshot to third_party (Closed) Base URL: http://dart.googlecode.com/svn/third_party/
Patch Set: Created 6 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: observatory_pub_packages/observe/src/observable_map.dart
===================================================================
--- observatory_pub_packages/observe/src/observable_map.dart (revision 0)
+++ observatory_pub_packages/observe/src/observable_map.dart (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2013, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
+// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
+// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+library observe.src.observable_map;
+
+import 'dart:collection';
+import 'package:observe/observe.dart';
+
+
+// TODO(jmesserly): this needs to be faster. We currently require multiple
+// lookups per key to get the old value.
+// TODO(jmesserly): this doesn't implement the precise interfaces like
+// LinkedHashMap, SplayTreeMap or HashMap. However it can use them for the
+// backing store.
+
+// TODO(jmesserly): should we summarize map changes like we do for list changes?
+class MapChangeRecord<K, V> extends ChangeRecord {
+ // TODO(jmesserly): we could store this more compactly if it matters, with
+ // subtypes for inserted and removed.
+
+ /// The map key that changed.
+ final K key;
+
+ /// The previous value associated with this key.
+ final V oldValue;
+
+ /// The new value associated with this key.
+ final V newValue;
+
+ /// True if this key was inserted.
+ final bool isInsert;
+
+ /// True if this key was removed.
+ final bool isRemove;
+
+ MapChangeRecord(this.key, this.oldValue, this.newValue)
+ : isInsert = false, isRemove = false;
+
+ MapChangeRecord.insert(this.key, this.newValue)
+ : isInsert = true, isRemove = false, oldValue = null;
+
+ MapChangeRecord.remove(this.key, this.oldValue)
+ : isInsert = false, isRemove = true, newValue = null;
+
+ String toString() {
+ var kind = isInsert ? 'insert' : isRemove ? 'remove' : 'set';
+ return '#<MapChangeRecord $kind $key from: $oldValue to: $newValue>';
+ }
+}
+
+/// Represents an observable map of model values. If any items are added,
+/// removed, or replaced, then observers that are listening to [changes]
+/// will be notified.
+class ObservableMap<K, V> extends ChangeNotifier implements Map<K, V> {
+ final Map<K, V> _map;
+
+ /// Creates an observable map.
+ ObservableMap() : _map = new HashMap<K, V>();
+
+ /// Creates a new observable map using a [LinkedHashMap].
+ ObservableMap.linked() : _map = new LinkedHashMap<K, V>();
+
+ /// Creates a new observable map using a [SplayTreeMap].
+ ObservableMap.sorted() : _map = new SplayTreeMap<K, V>();
+
+ /// Creates an observable map that contains all key value pairs of [other].
+ /// It will attempt to use the same backing map type if the other map is a
+ /// [LinkedHashMap], [SplayTreeMap], or [HashMap]. Otherwise it defaults to
+ /// [HashMap].
+ ///
+ /// Note this will perform a shallow conversion. If you want a deep conversion
+ /// you should use [toObservable].
+ factory ObservableMap.from(Map<K, V> other) {
+ return new ObservableMap<K, V>.createFromType(other)..addAll(other);
+ }
+
+ /// Like [ObservableMap.from], but creates an empty map.
+ factory ObservableMap.createFromType(Map<K, V> other) {
+ ObservableMap result;
+ if (other is SplayTreeMap) {
+ result = new ObservableMap<K, V>.sorted();
+ } else if (other is LinkedHashMap) {
+ result = new ObservableMap<K, V>.linked();
+ } else {
+ result = new ObservableMap<K, V>();
+ }
+ return result;
+ }
+
+ @reflectable Iterable<K> get keys => _map.keys;
+
+ @reflectable Iterable<V> get values => _map.values;
+
+ @reflectable int get length =>_map.length;
+
+ @reflectable bool get isEmpty => length == 0;
+
+ @reflectable bool get isNotEmpty => !isEmpty;
+
+ @reflectable bool containsValue(Object value) => _map.containsValue(value);
+
+ @reflectable bool containsKey(Object key) => _map.containsKey(key);
+
+ @reflectable V operator [](Object key) => _map[key];
+
+ @reflectable void operator []=(K key, V value) {
+ if (!hasObservers) {
+ _map[key] = value;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ int len = _map.length;
+ V oldValue = _map[key];
+
+ _map[key] = value;
+
+ if (len != _map.length) {
+ notifyPropertyChange(#length, len, _map.length);
+ notifyChange(new MapChangeRecord.insert(key, value));
+ _notifyKeysValuesChanged();
+ } else if (oldValue != value) {
+ notifyChange(new MapChangeRecord(key, oldValue, value));
+ _notifyValuesChanged();
+ }
+ }
+
+ void addAll(Map<K, V> other) {
+ other.forEach((K key, V value) { this[key] = value; });
+ }
+
+ V putIfAbsent(K key, V ifAbsent()) {
+ int len = _map.length;
+ V result = _map.putIfAbsent(key, ifAbsent);
+ if (hasObservers && len != _map.length) {
+ notifyPropertyChange(#length, len, _map.length);
+ notifyChange(new MapChangeRecord.insert(key, result));
+ _notifyKeysValuesChanged();
+ }
+ return result;
+ }
+
+ V remove(Object key) {
+ int len = _map.length;
+ V result = _map.remove(key);
+ if (hasObservers && len != _map.length) {
+ notifyChange(new MapChangeRecord.remove(key, result));
+ notifyPropertyChange(#length, len, _map.length);
+ _notifyKeysValuesChanged();
+ }
+ return result;
+ }
+
+ void clear() {
+ int len = _map.length;
+ if (hasObservers && len > 0) {
+ _map.forEach((key, value) {
+ notifyChange(new MapChangeRecord.remove(key, value));
+ });
+ notifyPropertyChange(#length, len, 0);
+ _notifyKeysValuesChanged();
+ }
+ _map.clear();
+ }
+
+ void forEach(void f(K key, V value)) => _map.forEach(f);
+
+ String toString() => Maps.mapToString(this);
+
+ // Note: we don't really have a reasonable old/new value to use here.
+ // But this should fix "keys" and "values" in templates with minimal overhead.
+ void _notifyKeysValuesChanged() {
+ notifyChange(new PropertyChangeRecord(this, #keys, null, null));
+ _notifyValuesChanged();
+ }
+
+ void _notifyValuesChanged() {
+ notifyChange(new PropertyChangeRecord(this, #values, null, null));
+ }
+}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698