Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1365)

Unified Diff: mojo/edk/system/channel_endpoint_id_unittest.cc

Issue 814543006: Move //mojo/{public, edk} underneath //third_party (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Rebase Created 5 years, 11 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « mojo/edk/system/channel_endpoint_id.cc ('k') | mojo/edk/system/channel_info.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: mojo/edk/system/channel_endpoint_id_unittest.cc
diff --git a/mojo/edk/system/channel_endpoint_id_unittest.cc b/mojo/edk/system/channel_endpoint_id_unittest.cc
deleted file mode 100644
index a5bd14fa73c28bd5bb6a3baca5bc3c6165a42435..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/mojo/edk/system/channel_endpoint_id_unittest.cc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,155 +0,0 @@
-// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
-// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
-// found in the LICENSE file.
-
-#include "mojo/edk/system/channel_endpoint_id.h"
-
-#include <sstream>
-
-#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
-
-namespace mojo {
-namespace system {
-namespace {
-
-TEST(ChannelEndpointIdTest, Basic) {
- ChannelEndpointId invalid;
- ChannelEndpointId bootstrap(ChannelEndpointId::GetBootstrap());
-
- EXPECT_EQ(invalid, invalid);
- EXPECT_EQ(bootstrap, bootstrap);
- EXPECT_FALSE(invalid == bootstrap);
-
- EXPECT_FALSE(invalid != invalid);
- EXPECT_FALSE(bootstrap != bootstrap);
- EXPECT_NE(invalid, bootstrap);
-
- EXPECT_FALSE(invalid < invalid);
- EXPECT_LT(invalid, bootstrap);
-
- EXPECT_FALSE(invalid.is_valid());
- EXPECT_TRUE(bootstrap.is_valid());
-
- EXPECT_FALSE(invalid.is_remote());
- EXPECT_FALSE(bootstrap.is_remote());
-
- // Test assignment.
- ChannelEndpointId copy;
- copy = bootstrap;
- EXPECT_EQ(copy, bootstrap);
- copy = invalid;
- EXPECT_EQ(copy, invalid);
-}
-
-// Tests values of invalid and bootstrap IDs. (This tests implementation
-// details.)
-TEST(ChannelEndpointIdTest, Value) {
- EXPECT_EQ(0u, ChannelEndpointId().value());
- EXPECT_EQ(1u, ChannelEndpointId::GetBootstrap().value());
-}
-
-// Tests ostream output. (This tests implementation details.)
-TEST(ChannelEndpointIdTest, Ostream) {
- {
- std::ostringstream stream;
- stream << ChannelEndpointId();
- EXPECT_EQ("0", stream.str());
- }
- {
- std::ostringstream stream;
- stream << ChannelEndpointId::GetBootstrap();
- EXPECT_EQ("1", stream.str());
- }
-}
-
-TEST(LocalChannelEndpointIdGeneratorTest, Basic) {
- LocalChannelEndpointIdGenerator gen;
-
- ChannelEndpointId id1;
- EXPECT_FALSE(id1.is_valid()); // Check sanity.
-
- id1 = gen.GetNext();
- EXPECT_TRUE(id1.is_valid());
- EXPECT_FALSE(id1.is_remote());
-
- EXPECT_EQ(ChannelEndpointId::GetBootstrap().value(), id1.value());
-
- ChannelEndpointId id2 = gen.GetNext();
- EXPECT_TRUE(id2.is_valid());
- EXPECT_FALSE(id2.is_remote());
- // Technically, nonequality here is an implementation detail, since, e.g.,
- // random generation of IDs would be a valid implementation.
- EXPECT_NE(id2, id1);
- // ... but right now we just increment to generate IDs.
- EXPECT_EQ(2u, id2.value());
-}
-
-// Note: LocalChannelEndpointIdGeneratorTest.WrapAround is defined further
-// below, outside the anonymous namespace.
-
-TEST(RemoteChannelEndpointIdGeneratorTest, Basic) {
- RemoteChannelEndpointIdGenerator gen;
-
- ChannelEndpointId id1;
- EXPECT_FALSE(id1.is_valid()); // Check sanity.
-
- id1 = gen.GetNext();
- EXPECT_TRUE(id1.is_valid());
- EXPECT_TRUE(id1.is_remote());
-
- // This tests an implementation detail.
- EXPECT_EQ(ChannelEndpointId::kRemoteFlag, id1.value());
-
- ChannelEndpointId id2 = gen.GetNext();
- EXPECT_TRUE(id2.is_valid());
- EXPECT_TRUE(id2.is_remote());
- // Technically, nonequality here is an implementation detail, since, e.g.,
- // random generation of IDs would be a valid implementation.
- EXPECT_NE(id2, id1);
- // ... but right now we just increment to generate IDs.
- EXPECT_EQ(ChannelEndpointId::kRemoteFlag + 1, id2.value());
-}
-
-// Note: RemoteChannelEndpointIdGeneratorTest.WrapAround is defined further
-// below, outside the anonymous namespace.
-
-} // namespace
-
-// Tests that |LocalChannelEndpointIdGenerator| handles wrap-around correctly.
-// (This tests implementation details.) This test isn't in an anonymous
-// namespace, since it needs to be friended.
-TEST(LocalChannelEndpointIdGeneratorTest, WrapAround) {
- LocalChannelEndpointIdGenerator gen;
- gen.next_ = ChannelEndpointId(ChannelEndpointId::kRemoteFlag - 1);
-
- ChannelEndpointId id = gen.GetNext();
- EXPECT_TRUE(id.is_valid());
- EXPECT_FALSE(id.is_remote());
- EXPECT_EQ(ChannelEndpointId::kRemoteFlag - 1, id.value());
-
- id = gen.GetNext();
- EXPECT_TRUE(id.is_valid());
- EXPECT_FALSE(id.is_remote());
- EXPECT_EQ(1u, id.value());
-}
-
-// Tests that |RemoteChannelEndpointIdGenerator| handles wrap-around correctly.
-// (This tests implementation details.) This test isn't in an anonymous
-// namespace, since it needs to be friended.
-TEST(RemoteChannelEndpointIdGeneratorTest, WrapAround) {
- RemoteChannelEndpointIdGenerator gen;
- gen.next_ = ChannelEndpointId(~0u);
-
- ChannelEndpointId id = gen.GetNext();
- EXPECT_TRUE(id.is_valid());
- EXPECT_TRUE(id.is_remote());
- EXPECT_EQ(~0u, id.value());
-
- id = gen.GetNext();
- EXPECT_TRUE(id.is_valid());
- EXPECT_TRUE(id.is_remote());
- EXPECT_EQ(ChannelEndpointId::kRemoteFlag, id.value());
-}
-
-} // namespace system
-} // namespace mojo
« no previous file with comments | « mojo/edk/system/channel_endpoint_id.cc ('k') | mojo/edk/system/channel_info.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698