| Index: content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree_unittest.cc
|
| diff --git a/content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree_unittest.cc b/content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree_unittest.cc
|
| index bb705c7f881adc195a656a8539e0e1a1977e5135..08013ba4faf386e9197f74ab54259b809496b916 100644
|
| --- a/content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree_unittest.cc
|
| +++ b/content/browser/frame_host/frame_tree_unittest.cc
|
| @@ -118,7 +118,12 @@ class FrameTreeTest : public RenderViewHostImplTestHarness {
|
| // Exercise tree manipulation routines.
|
| // - Add a series of nodes and verify tree structure.
|
| // - Remove a series of nodes and verify tree structure.
|
| -TEST_F(FrameTreeTest, Shape) {
|
| +//
|
| +// TODO(nick): Disabled temporarily because of a bad interaction with the
|
| +// WebContentsObserverConsistencyChecker -- calling AddFrame directly causes
|
| +// the RFH to not be announced. We either need to rewrite this test, or
|
| +// be consistent in the layer at which we do render frame creation.
|
| +TEST_F(FrameTreeTest, DISABLED_Shape) {
|
| // Use the FrameTree of the WebContents so that it has all the delegates it
|
| // needs. We may want to consider a test version of this.
|
| FrameTree* frame_tree = contents()->GetFrameTree();
|
|
|