Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1196)

Unified Diff: mojo/edk/system/core.cc

Issue 782693004: Update mojo sdk to rev f6c8ec07c01deebc13178d516225fd12695c3dc2 (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: hack mojo_system_impl gypi for android :| Created 6 years ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: mojo/edk/system/core.cc
diff --git a/mojo/edk/system/core.cc b/mojo/edk/system/core.cc
index 27d33b26db94a85b32993de05d751b055764b65b..3843d9714a7702c36e2290e382976eaf0c08388b 100644
--- a/mojo/edk/system/core.cc
+++ b/mojo/edk/system/core.cc
@@ -47,10 +47,11 @@ namespace system {
// |Dispatcher|s for the handles that it wants to wait on with a |Waiter|
// object; this |Waiter| object may be created on the stack of that thread or be
// kept in thread local storage for that thread (TODO(vtl): future improvement).
-// The |Dispatcher| then adds the |Waiter| to a |WaiterList| that's either owned
-// by that |Dispatcher| (see |SimpleDispatcher|) or by a secondary object (e.g.,
-// |MessagePipe|). To signal/wake a |Waiter|, the object in question -- either a
-// |SimpleDispatcher| or a secondary object -- talks to its |WaiterList|.
+// The |Dispatcher| then adds the |Waiter| to an |AwakableList| that's either
+// owned by that |Dispatcher| (see |SimpleDispatcher|) or by a secondary object
+// (e.g., |MessagePipe|). To signal/wake a |Waiter|, the object in question --
+// either a |SimpleDispatcher| or a secondary object -- talks to its
+// |AwakableList|.
// Thread-safety notes
//
@@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ MojoResult Core::WriteMessage(MojoHandle message_pipe_handle,
uint32_t num_handles,
MojoWriteMessageFlags flags) {
scoped_refptr<Dispatcher> dispatcher(GetDispatcher(message_pipe_handle));
- if (!dispatcher.get())
+ if (!dispatcher)
return MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
// Easy case: not sending any handles.
@@ -288,7 +289,7 @@ MojoResult Core::ReadMessage(MojoHandle message_pipe_handle,
UserPointer<uint32_t> num_handles,
MojoReadMessageFlags flags) {
scoped_refptr<Dispatcher> dispatcher(GetDispatcher(message_pipe_handle));
- if (!dispatcher.get())
+ if (!dispatcher)
return MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
uint32_t num_handles_value = num_handles.IsNull() ? 0 : num_handles.Get();
@@ -322,7 +323,7 @@ MojoResult Core::ReadMessage(MojoHandle message_pipe_handle,
<< " handles, but handle table full";
// Close dispatchers (outside the lock).
for (size_t i = 0; i < dispatchers.size(); i++) {
- if (dispatchers[i].get())
+ if (dispatchers[i])
dispatchers[i]->Close();
}
if (rv == MOJO_RESULT_OK)
@@ -381,7 +382,7 @@ MojoResult Core::WriteData(MojoHandle data_pipe_producer_handle,
MojoWriteDataFlags flags) {
scoped_refptr<Dispatcher> dispatcher(
GetDispatcher(data_pipe_producer_handle));
- if (!dispatcher.get())
+ if (!dispatcher)
return MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
return dispatcher->WriteData(elements, num_bytes, flags);
@@ -393,7 +394,7 @@ MojoResult Core::BeginWriteData(MojoHandle data_pipe_producer_handle,
MojoWriteDataFlags flags) {
scoped_refptr<Dispatcher> dispatcher(
GetDispatcher(data_pipe_producer_handle));
- if (!dispatcher.get())
+ if (!dispatcher)
return MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
return dispatcher->BeginWriteData(buffer, buffer_num_bytes, flags);
@@ -403,7 +404,7 @@ MojoResult Core::EndWriteData(MojoHandle data_pipe_producer_handle,
uint32_t num_bytes_written) {
scoped_refptr<Dispatcher> dispatcher(
GetDispatcher(data_pipe_producer_handle));
- if (!dispatcher.get())
+ if (!dispatcher)
return MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
return dispatcher->EndWriteData(num_bytes_written);
@@ -415,7 +416,7 @@ MojoResult Core::ReadData(MojoHandle data_pipe_consumer_handle,
MojoReadDataFlags flags) {
scoped_refptr<Dispatcher> dispatcher(
GetDispatcher(data_pipe_consumer_handle));
- if (!dispatcher.get())
+ if (!dispatcher)
return MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
return dispatcher->ReadData(elements, num_bytes, flags);
@@ -427,7 +428,7 @@ MojoResult Core::BeginReadData(MojoHandle data_pipe_consumer_handle,
MojoReadDataFlags flags) {
scoped_refptr<Dispatcher> dispatcher(
GetDispatcher(data_pipe_consumer_handle));
- if (!dispatcher.get())
+ if (!dispatcher)
return MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
return dispatcher->BeginReadData(buffer, buffer_num_bytes, flags);
@@ -437,7 +438,7 @@ MojoResult Core::EndReadData(MojoHandle data_pipe_consumer_handle,
uint32_t num_bytes_read) {
scoped_refptr<Dispatcher> dispatcher(
GetDispatcher(data_pipe_consumer_handle));
- if (!dispatcher.get())
+ if (!dispatcher)
return MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
return dispatcher->EndReadData(num_bytes_read);
@@ -457,7 +458,7 @@ MojoResult Core::CreateSharedBuffer(
result = SharedBufferDispatcher::Create(platform_support(), validated_options,
num_bytes, &dispatcher);
if (result != MOJO_RESULT_OK) {
- DCHECK(!dispatcher.get());
+ DCHECK(!dispatcher);
return result;
}
@@ -477,7 +478,7 @@ MojoResult Core::DuplicateBufferHandle(
UserPointer<const MojoDuplicateBufferHandleOptions> options,
UserPointer<MojoHandle> new_buffer_handle) {
scoped_refptr<Dispatcher> dispatcher(GetDispatcher(buffer_handle));
- if (!dispatcher.get())
+ if (!dispatcher)
return MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
// Don't verify |options| here; that's the dispatcher's job.
@@ -504,7 +505,7 @@ MojoResult Core::MapBuffer(MojoHandle buffer_handle,
UserPointer<void*> buffer,
MojoMapBufferFlags flags) {
scoped_refptr<Dispatcher> dispatcher(GetDispatcher(buffer_handle));
- if (!dispatcher.get())
+ if (!dispatcher)
return MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
scoped_ptr<embedder::PlatformSharedBufferMapping> mapping;
@@ -532,7 +533,7 @@ MojoResult Core::UnmapBuffer(UserPointer<void> buffer) {
// Note: We allow |handles| to repeat the same handle multiple times, since
// different flags may be specified.
-// TODO(vtl): This incurs a performance cost in |RemoveWaiter()|. Analyze this
+// TODO(vtl): This incurs a performance cost in |Remove()|. Analyze this
// more carefully and address it if necessary.
MojoResult Core::WaitManyInternal(const MojoHandle* handles,
const MojoHandleSignals* signals,
@@ -547,7 +548,7 @@ MojoResult Core::WaitManyInternal(const MojoHandle* handles,
dispatchers.reserve(num_handles);
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < num_handles; i++) {
scoped_refptr<Dispatcher> dispatcher = GetDispatcher(handles[i]);
- if (!dispatcher.get()) {
+ if (!dispatcher) {
*result_index = i;
return MOJO_RESULT_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
}
@@ -561,7 +562,7 @@ MojoResult Core::WaitManyInternal(const MojoHandle* handles,
uint32_t i;
MojoResult rv = MOJO_RESULT_OK;
for (i = 0; i < num_handles; i++) {
- rv = dispatchers[i]->AddWaiter(
+ rv = dispatchers[i]->AddAwakable(
&waiter, signals[i], i, signals_states ? &signals_states[i] : nullptr);
if (rv != MOJO_RESULT_OK) {
*result_index = i;
@@ -579,8 +580,8 @@ MojoResult Core::WaitManyInternal(const MojoHandle* handles,
// |Wait()|/|WaitMany()| call. (Only after doing this can |waiter| be
// destroyed, but this would still be required if the waiter were in TLS.)
for (i = 0; i < num_added; i++) {
- dispatchers[i]->RemoveWaiter(&waiter,
- signals_states ? &signals_states[i] : nullptr);
+ dispatchers[i]->RemoveAwakable(
+ &waiter, signals_states ? &signals_states[i] : nullptr);
}
if (signals_states) {
for (; i < num_handles; i++)

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698