Stub implementation of Permissions API module.

LayoutTests/http/tests/permissions/resources/test-api-surface.js

Index: LayoutTests/http/tests/permissions/resources/test-api-surface.js
diff --git a/LayoutTests/http/tests/permissions/resources/test-api-surface.js b/LayoutTests/http/tests/permissions/resources/test-api-surface.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cb777296c6daf8feb0958c27cb98f314e3413765
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LayoutTests/http/tests/permissions/resources/test-api-surface.js
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+if (self.importScripts) {

[Peter Beverloo, 2014/12/01 13:26:07]

Would it make sense to include this block (lines 1-8) in helpers.js, since it's
going to be repeated for every test?

[mlamouri (slow - plz ping), 2014/12/01 13:33:17]

As discussed f2f, it's unlikely that we will have more than two tests in the
near future. Let's refactor the 4 lines when needed. (The issue is that it will
make helpers.js running code at insertion time which it doesn't for now and will
have code running depending on the context, which it doesn't too.)

+    importScripts('helpers.js');
+
+    if (get_current_scope() == 'ServiceWorker')
+        importScripts('../../serviceworker/resources/worker-testharness.js');
+    else
+        importScripts('../../resources/testharness.js');
+}
+
+test(function() {
+    assert_own_property(self, 'Permissions');
+    assert_own_property(Permissions, 'query');
+
+    assert_own_property(self, 'PermissionStatus');
+}, 'Check the Permissions API surface in the ' + get_current_scope() + ' scope.');
+
+done();