| Index: util/mach/mach_message_server.cc
|
| diff --git a/util/mach/mach_message_server.cc b/util/mach/mach_message_server.cc
|
| index c0f848daa9a627ee04d9fef9ea763c3052f7be2c..08760fc6cfe78aa1469ace8b7b645757b1d6fde9 100644
|
| --- a/util/mach/mach_message_server.cc
|
| +++ b/util/mach/mach_message_server.cc
|
| @@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ mach_msg_return_t MachMessageServer::Run(Interface* interface,
|
|
|
| mach_msg_size_t trailer_alloc = REQUESTED_TRAILER_SIZE(options);
|
| mach_msg_size_t max_request_size = interface->MachMessageServerRequestSize();
|
| - mach_msg_size_t request_alloc = round_page(max_request_size + trailer_alloc);
|
| + mach_msg_size_t request_alloc =
|
| + round_page(round_msg(max_request_size) + trailer_alloc);
|
|
|
| // mach_msg_server() and mach_msg_server_once() invert this condition, but
|
| // their interpretation is incorrect. When it is desirable to retry a receive
|
| @@ -120,9 +121,10 @@ mach_msg_return_t MachMessageServer::Run(Interface* interface,
|
| // the initial receive attempt. On the other hand, when this behavior is not
|
| // requested, there is no reason to attempt receiving messages any larger than
|
| // expected.
|
| - mach_msg_size_t request_size = (receive_large == kReceiveLargeResize)
|
| - ? max_request_size + trailer_alloc
|
| - : request_alloc;
|
| + mach_msg_size_t request_size =
|
| + (receive_large == kReceiveLargeResize)
|
| + ? round_msg(max_request_size) + trailer_alloc
|
| + : request_alloc;
|
|
|
| mach_msg_size_t max_reply_size = interface->MachMessageServerReplySize();
|
|
|
| @@ -186,7 +188,7 @@ mach_msg_return_t MachMessageServer::Run(Interface* interface,
|
| } else if (kr == MACH_RCV_TOO_LARGE &&
|
| receive_large == kReceiveLargeResize) {
|
| this_request_size =
|
| - round_page(request_header->msgh_size + trailer_alloc);
|
| + round_page(round_msg(request_header->msgh_size) + trailer_alloc);
|
| this_request_alloc = this_request_size;
|
| } else {
|
| return kr;
|
|
|