remove GrAllocPool

src/gpu/GrTextStrike.h

Index: src/gpu/GrTextStrike.h
diff --git a/src/gpu/GrTextStrike.h b/src/gpu/GrTextStrike.h
index 779d676e433f2a50e3185898396db9c221c05ee6..09d7323179543950840c1f937e342fcc4dc9c2f0 100644
--- a/src/gpu/GrTextStrike.h
+++ b/src/gpu/GrTextStrike.h
@@ -11,12 +11,12 @@
 #ifndef GrTextStrike_DEFINED
 #define GrTextStrike_DEFINED
 
-#include "GrAllocPool.h"
+#include "GrAtlas.h"
+#include "GrDrawTarget.h"
 #include "GrFontScaler.h"
-#include "SkTDynamicHash.h"
 #include "GrGlyph.h"
-#include "GrDrawTarget.h"
-#include "GrAtlas.h"
+#include "SkTDynamicHash.h"
+#include "SkVarAlloc.h"
 
 class GrFontCache;
 class GrGpu;
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ public:
 private:
     SkTDynamicHash<GrGlyph, GrGlyph::PackedID> fCache;
     const GrFontDescKey* fFontScalerKey;
-    GrTAllocPool<GrGlyph> fPool;
+    SkVarAlloc fPool;

[mtklein, 2014/11/21 15:20:22]

SkGlyphs look relatively small and relocatable.  If you're keen to play around,
I'd consider just putting them in an SkTDArray, referring to them by int index
instead of pointer if need be.  It's hard to beat the density of SkTDArray, and
for things this small I wouldn't be surprised if realloc were faster than doing
block allocation like GrTAllocPool/SkVarAlloc/SkChunkAlloc.

[mtklein, 2014/11/21 15:21:59]

Err, was looking at SkGlyph.  Looking at GrGlyph, all the same applies.  Small,
relocatable, etc.

 
     GrFontCache*    fFontCache;
     bool            fUseDistanceField;