Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(855)

Unified Diff: content/common/gpu/media/h264_poc.cc

Issue 742233002: Implement |pic_order_cnt| computation for VTVideoDecode accelerator. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@vt_reorder
Patch Set: Created 6 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/common/gpu/media/h264_poc.cc
diff --git a/content/common/gpu/media/h264_poc.cc b/content/common/gpu/media/h264_poc.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0fd5ff5a779fe500f544429e49799d6682a8014a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/common/gpu/media/h264_poc.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
DaleCurtis 2014/11/20 23:03:30 Definitely needs a unit test in this CL, this is s
sandersd (OOO until July 31) 2014/11/20 23:58:25 Acknowledged. I'll ping when I have added that. I
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include <algorithm>
+
+#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "content/common/gpu/media/h264_poc.h"
+#include "media/filters/h264_parser.h"
+
+namespace content {
+
+H264POC::H264POC() {
+ Reset();
+}
+
+H264POC::~H264POC() {
+}
+
+void H264POC::Reset() {
+ // It shouldn't be necessary to reset these values, but doing so will improve
+ // reproducibility for buggy streams.
+ ref_pic_order_cnt_msb_ = 0;
+ ref_pic_order_cnt_lsb_ = 0;
+ prev_frame_num_ = 0;
+ prev_frame_num_offset_ = 0;
+}
+
+static bool HasMMCO5(const media::H264SliceHeader& slice_hdr) {
DaleCurtis 2014/11/20 23:03:30 Needs docs.
sandersd (OOO until July 31) 2014/11/20 23:58:24 Done.
+ if (slice_hdr.nal_ref_idc == 0 ||
+ slice_hdr.idr_pic_flag ||
+ !slice_hdr.adaptive_ref_pic_marking_mode_flag) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < arraysize(slice_hdr.ref_pic_marking); i++) {
DaleCurtis 2014/11/20 23:03:29 Why is this a loop? It seems this is all just: re
sandersd (OOO until July 31) 2014/11/20 23:58:24 No, it loops until ref_pic_marking[i].mmco == 0, r
+ switch (slice_hdr.ref_pic_marking[i].memory_mgmnt_control_operation) {
+ case 0:
+ return false;
+ case 5:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Should not get here, the list is always zero terminated.
+ return false;
+}
+
+bool H264POC::ComputePicOrderCnt(
+ const media::H264SPS* sps,
+ const media::H264SliceHeader& slice_hdr,
+ int32_t *pic_order_cnt) {
+ if (slice_hdr.field_pic_flag) {
+ DLOG(ERROR) << "Interlaced frames are not supported";
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ // TODO(sandersd): Handle |gaps_in_frame_num_value|.
+ if (prev_frame_num_ > 0 && prev_frame_num_ < slice_hdr.frame_num - 1) {
+ DLOG(ERROR) << "Gaps in frame_num are not supported";
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ bool mmco5 = HasMMCO5(slice_hdr);
DaleCurtis 2014/11/20 23:03:30 Docs or a link to the spec this is implementing?
sandersd (OOO until July 31) 2014/11/20 23:58:24 Done.
+ int32_t max_frame_num = 1 << (sps->log2_max_frame_num_minus4 + 4);
+ int32_t max_pic_order_cnt_lsb =
+ 1 << (sps->log2_max_pic_order_cnt_lsb_minus4 + 4);
+
+ // Reorganized slightly from spec pseudocode to handle MMCO5 when storing.
+ switch (sps->pic_order_cnt_type) {
DaleCurtis 2014/11/20 23:03:30 nit: This actually seems like it would look better
sandersd (OOO until July 31) 2014/11/20 23:58:24 I tried it both ways, I think it's more clear as a
+ case 0:
+ {
DaleCurtis 2014/11/20 23:03:29 Move { to above line and save 2 spaces of indent.
sandersd (OOO until July 31) 2014/11/20 23:58:24 Done.
+ int32_t prev_pic_order_cnt_msb = ref_pic_order_cnt_msb_;
+ int32_t prev_pic_order_cnt_lsb = ref_pic_order_cnt_lsb_;
+
+ if (slice_hdr.idr_pic_flag) {
+ prev_pic_order_cnt_msb = 0;
+ prev_pic_order_cnt_lsb = 0;
+ }
+
+ // 8-3.
DaleCurtis 2014/11/20 23:03:29 Helps to include summary of this step :) Ditto for
sandersd (OOO until July 31) 2014/11/20 23:58:24 Done. At least as much as possible, the steps are
+ int32_t pic_order_cnt_msb;
+ if ((slice_hdr.pic_order_cnt_lsb < prev_pic_order_cnt_lsb) &&
+ (prev_pic_order_cnt_lsb - slice_hdr.pic_order_cnt_lsb >=
+ max_pic_order_cnt_lsb / 2)) {
+ pic_order_cnt_msb = prev_pic_order_cnt_msb + max_pic_order_cnt_lsb;
+ } else if ((slice_hdr.pic_order_cnt_lsb > prev_pic_order_cnt_lsb) &&
+ (slice_hdr.pic_order_cnt_lsb - prev_pic_order_cnt_lsb >
+ max_pic_order_cnt_lsb / 2)) {
+ pic_order_cnt_msb = prev_pic_order_cnt_msb - max_pic_order_cnt_lsb;
+ } else {
+ pic_order_cnt_msb = prev_pic_order_cnt_msb;
+ }
+
+ // 8-4, 8-5.
+ int32_t top_poc = pic_order_cnt_msb + slice_hdr.pic_order_cnt_lsb;
+ int32_t bottom_poc = top_poc + slice_hdr.delta_pic_order_cnt_bottom;
+ *pic_order_cnt = std::min(top_poc, bottom_poc);
+
+ // Store state.
+ prev_frame_num_ = slice_hdr.frame_num;
+ if (slice_hdr.nal_ref_idc != 0) {
+ if (mmco5) {
+ ref_pic_order_cnt_msb_ = 0;
+ ref_pic_order_cnt_lsb_ = top_poc;
+ } else {
+ ref_pic_order_cnt_msb_ = pic_order_cnt_msb;
+ ref_pic_order_cnt_lsb_ = slice_hdr.pic_order_cnt_lsb;
+ }
+ }
+
+ break;
+ }
+
+ case 1:
+ {
+ // AVC 8.2.1.2.
DaleCurtis 2014/11/20 23:03:30 Again, this is all gibberish to me, so you'll need
sandersd (OOO until July 31) 2014/11/20 23:58:24 Acknowledged.
+ // 8-6.
+ int32_t frame_num_offset;
+ if (slice_hdr.idr_pic_flag)
+ frame_num_offset = 0;
+ else if (prev_frame_num_ > slice_hdr.frame_num)
+ frame_num_offset = prev_frame_num_offset_ + max_frame_num;
+ else
+ frame_num_offset = prev_frame_num_offset_;
+
+ // 8-7.
+ int32_t abs_frame_num;
+ if (sps->num_ref_frames_in_pic_order_cnt_cycle != 0)
+ abs_frame_num = frame_num_offset + slice_hdr.frame_num;
+ else
+ abs_frame_num = 0;
+
+ if (slice_hdr.nal_ref_idc == 0 && abs_frame_num > 0)
+ abs_frame_num--;
+
+ // 8-9.
+ int32_t expected_pic_order_cnt = 0;
+ if (abs_frame_num > 0) {
+ // 8-8.
+ if (sps->num_ref_frames_in_pic_order_cnt_cycle == 0) {
+ DLOG(ERROR) << "Invalid num_ref_frames_in_pic_order_cnt_cycle";
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ int32_t pic_order_cnt_cycle_cnt =
+ (abs_frame_num - 1) / sps->num_ref_frames_in_pic_order_cnt_cycle;
+ int32_t frame_num_in_pic_order_cnt_cycle =
+ (abs_frame_num - 1) % sps->num_ref_frames_in_pic_order_cnt_cycle;
+ expected_pic_order_cnt = pic_order_cnt_cycle_cnt *
+ sps->expected_delta_per_pic_order_cnt_cycle;
+
+ // H264Parser checks that num_ref_frames_in_pic_order_cnt_cycle < 255.
+ for (int32_t i = 0; i <= frame_num_in_pic_order_cnt_cycle; i++)
+ expected_pic_order_cnt += sps->offset_for_ref_frame[i];
+ }
+ if (slice_hdr.nal_ref_idc == 0)
+ expected_pic_order_cnt += sps->offset_for_non_ref_pic;
+
+ // 8-10.
+ int32_t top_poc = expected_pic_order_cnt +
+ slice_hdr.delta_pic_order_cnt[0];
+ int32_t bottom_poc = top_poc + sps->offset_for_top_to_bottom_field +
+ slice_hdr.delta_pic_order_cnt[1];
+ *pic_order_cnt = std::min(top_poc, bottom_poc);
+
+ // Store state.
+ prev_frame_num_ = slice_hdr.frame_num;
+ prev_frame_num_offset_ = frame_num_offset;
+ if (mmco5)
+ prev_frame_num_offset_ = 0;
+
+ break;
+ }
+
+ case 2:
+ {
+ // AVC 8.2.1.3.
+ // 8-11.
+ int32_t frame_num_offset;
+ if (slice_hdr.idr_pic_flag)
+ frame_num_offset = 0;
+ else if (prev_frame_num_ > slice_hdr.frame_num)
+ frame_num_offset = prev_frame_num_offset_ + max_frame_num;
+ else
+ frame_num_offset = prev_frame_num_offset_;
+
+ // 8-12, 8-13.
+ if (slice_hdr.idr_pic_flag)
+ *pic_order_cnt = 0;
+ else if (slice_hdr.nal_ref_idc == 0)
+ *pic_order_cnt = 2 * (frame_num_offset + slice_hdr.frame_num) - 1;
+ else
+ *pic_order_cnt = 2 * (frame_num_offset + slice_hdr.frame_num);
+
+ // Store state.
+ prev_frame_num_ = slice_hdr.frame_num;
+ prev_frame_num_offset_ = frame_num_offset;
+ if (mmco5)
+ prev_frame_num_offset_ = 0;
+
+ break;
+ }
+
+ default:
+ DLOG(ERROR) << "Invalid pic_order_cnt_type: " << sps->pic_order_cnt_type;
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+} // namespace content

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698