Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(313)

Side by Side Diff: src/incremental-marking.cc

Issue 7324049: Do nothing in IncrementalMarking::Step when we are not marking or sweeping. (Closed) Base URL: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/experimental/gc
Patch Set: Created 9 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
1 // Copyright 2011 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved. 1 // Copyright 2011 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
2 // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 2 // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
3 // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are 3 // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
4 // met: 4 // met:
5 // 5 //
6 // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 6 // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
7 // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. 7 // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
8 // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above 8 // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
9 // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following 9 // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
10 // disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided 10 // disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
(...skipping 520 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
531 if (FLAG_trace_incremental_marking) { 531 if (FLAG_trace_incremental_marking) {
532 PrintF("[IncrementalMarking] Complete (normal).\n"); 532 PrintF("[IncrementalMarking] Complete (normal).\n");
533 } 533 }
534 heap_->isolate()->stack_guard()->RequestGC(); 534 heap_->isolate()->stack_guard()->RequestGC();
535 } 535 }
536 536
537 537
538 void IncrementalMarking::Step(intptr_t allocated_bytes) { 538 void IncrementalMarking::Step(intptr_t allocated_bytes) {
539 if (heap_->gc_state() != Heap::NOT_IN_GC) return; 539 if (heap_->gc_state() != Heap::NOT_IN_GC) return;
540 if (!FLAG_incremental_marking) return; 540 if (!FLAG_incremental_marking) return;
541 if (!FLAG_incremental_marking_steps) return; 541 if (!FLAG_incremental_marking_steps) return;
Lasse Reichstein 2011/07/12 08:18:32 Are FLAG_incremental_marking and FLAG_incremental_
Vyacheslav Egorov (Chromium) 2011/07/12 09:27:54 They are independent.
542 if (state_ != SWEEPING && state_ != MARKING) return;
Lasse Reichstein 2011/07/12 08:18:32 How about combining all these conditions with || a
Vyacheslav Egorov (Chromium) 2011/07/12 09:27:54 Done.
542 543
543 allocated_ += allocated_bytes; 544 allocated_ += allocated_bytes;
544 545
545 if (allocated_ < kAllocatedThreshold) return; 546 if (allocated_ < kAllocatedThreshold) return;
546 547
547 intptr_t bytes_to_process = allocated_ * allocation_marking_factor_; 548 intptr_t bytes_to_process = allocated_ * allocation_marking_factor_;
548 549
549 double start = 0; 550 double start = 0;
550 551
551 if (FLAG_trace_incremental_marking || FLAG_trace_gc) { 552 if (FLAG_trace_incremental_marking || FLAG_trace_gc) {
(...skipping 50 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
602 if (FLAG_trace_incremental_marking || FLAG_trace_gc) { 603 if (FLAG_trace_incremental_marking || FLAG_trace_gc) {
603 double end = OS::TimeCurrentMillis(); 604 double end = OS::TimeCurrentMillis();
604 double delta = (end - start); 605 double delta = (end - start);
605 steps_took_ += delta; 606 steps_took_ += delta;
606 steps_took_since_last_gc_ += delta; 607 steps_took_since_last_gc_ += delta;
607 } 608 }
608 } 609 }
609 610
610 611
611 } } // namespace v8::internal 612 } } // namespace v8::internal
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698