Use "unsigned" rather than "unsigned long" for C++ code interacting with WebIDL's "unsigned long".

Use "unsigned" rather than "unsigned long" for C++ code interacting with WebIDL's "unsigned long".

(WebIDL's "unsigned long" is a 32-bit type)

BUG=267360
Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=185257

[eroman, 2014-11-12 20:31:40]

eroman@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ haraken@chromium.org

[eroman, 2014-11-12 20:31:40]

This is a first of a number of instances I would like to fix.

Do you recommend using "unsigned" instead, like most of the existing bindings
code uses?

Thanks!

[haraken, 2014-11-12 23:26:32]

On 2014/11/12 20:31:40, eroman wrote:
> This is a first of a number of instances I would like to fix.
> 
> Do you recommend using "unsigned" instead, like most of the existing bindings
> code uses?

Yeah, I'd prefer unsigned to follow other existing bindings.

LGTM for the patch set 1.

[eroman, 2014-11-12 23:30:18]

Done -- changed to unsigned

[eroman, 2014-11-12 23:30:21]

The CQ bit was checked by eroman@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-11-12 23:31:02]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/718203002/40001

[eroman, 2014-11-12 23:35:03]

The CQ bit was unchecked by eroman@chromium.org

[eroman, 2014-11-12 23:36:20]

The CQ bit was checked by eroman@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-11-12 23:37:03]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/718203002/40001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-11-13 00:54:33]

Committed patchset #3 (id:40001) as 185257