Replace WPA and RSN with PSK in Other Wi-Fi network UI.

Replace WPA and RSN with PSK in Other Wi-Fi network UI.

BUG=chromium-os:13333
TEST=Network Menu > Other Wi-Fi Network > Security should have WEP and PSK. Both should still work. PSK should work for both RSN and WPA networks.

Committed: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=87557

[stevenjb, 2011-06-01 22:45:33]

I spoke with Sam about the UI and we agreed that there is no need for separate
entries for RSN or WPA, but that the PSK option should mention RSN and WPA for
users who are unaware that WPA is a superset of RSN and WPA.

[Charlie Lee, 2011-06-01 23:03:06]

is it still ok to add new strings?

http://codereview.chromium.org/7107005/diff/1/chrome/app/generated_resources.grd
File chrome/app/generated_resources.grd (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/7107005/diff/1/chrome/app/generated_resources....
chrome/app/generated_resources.grd:10583: <message
name="IDS_OPTIONS_SETTINGS_INTERNET_OPTIONS_SECURITY_WPA" desc="In settings
Internet options, a string specifying security WPA.">
delete wpa and rsn?

[James Cook, 2011-06-01 23:24:22]

http://codereview.chromium.org/7107005/diff/1/chrome/app/generated_resources.grd
File chrome/app/generated_resources.grd (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/7107005/diff/1/chrome/app/generated_resources....
chrome/app/generated_resources.grd:10590: PSK (WPA or RSN)
End-user documentation about Wi-Fi security often refers to "WPA" or "WPA2" as a
choice when connecting to a network.  I think it would be a good idea to have an
item in the menu labeled "WPA" or "WPA-PSK".  Regardless of how it's implemented
under the hood, end users are going to look for matching strings.  Are you sure
these options need to be collapsed together?

For example, here's what Netgear's Wi-Fi router config page looks like:
http://support.netgear.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/112

[stevenjb, 2011-06-01 23:34:37]

I pinged Zel and he would rather push the change than wait. If we don't get this
translated, it's not a major concern.

http://codereview.chromium.org/7107005/diff/1/chrome/app/generated_resources.grd
File chrome/app/generated_resources.grd (right):

http://codereview.chromium.org/7107005/diff/1/chrome/app/generated_resources....
chrome/app/generated_resources.grd:10583: <message
name="IDS_OPTIONS_SETTINGS_INTERNET_OPTIONS_SECURITY_WPA" desc="In settings
Internet options, a string specifying security WPA.">
On 2011/06/01 23:03:06, Charlie Lee wrote:
> delete wpa and rsn?

Done.

http://codereview.chromium.org/7107005/diff/1/chrome/app/generated_resources....
chrome/app/generated_resources.grd:10590: PSK (WPA or RSN)
On 2011/06/01 23:24:22, James Cook (Chromium) wrote:
> End-user documentation about Wi-Fi security often refers to "WPA" or "WPA2" as
a
> choice when connecting to a network.  I think it would be a good idea to have
an
> item in the menu labeled "WPA" or "WPA-PSK".  Regardless of how it's
implemented
> under the hood, end users are going to look for matching strings.  Are you
sure
> these options need to be collapsed together?
> 
> For example, here's what Netgear's Wi-Fi router config page looks like:
> http://support.netgear.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/112
> 

Sam and I went back and forth on this. It's confusing any way you do it. If we
have "WPA" and "PSK" and the user is looking for "WPA-PSK" that's also
confusing.

We ended up with one entry that includes "PSK", "WPA", and "RSN", so hopefully
anyone setting up a hidden network will recognize one of those and choose that
option.

It is entirely possible that we will iterate on this based on feedback.

[Charlie Lee, 2011-06-02 00:10:15]

LGTM