Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(235)

Unified Diff: content/browser/service_worker/service_worker_dispatcher_host_unittest.cc

Issue 70533005: More scaffolding, add class ServiceWorkerProviderHost. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Created 7 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: content/browser/service_worker/service_worker_dispatcher_host_unittest.cc
diff --git a/content/browser/service_worker/service_worker_dispatcher_host_unittest.cc b/content/browser/service_worker/service_worker_dispatcher_host_unittest.cc
index ad62568c85d5f99307c564eeb6fa9d4cf50c74fd..2276a5acebd9ffed933ae013a476952ad0fc4e4e 100644
--- a/content/browser/service_worker/service_worker_dispatcher_host_unittest.cc
+++ b/content/browser/service_worker/service_worker_dispatcher_host_unittest.cc
@@ -6,7 +6,10 @@
#include "base/command_line.h"
#include "base/files/file_path.h"
+#include "base/message_loop/message_loop.h"
+#include "content/browser/browser_thread_impl.h"
#include "content/browser/service_worker/service_worker_context_core.h"
+#include "content/browser/service_worker/service_worker_context_wrapper.h"
#include "content/common/service_worker_messages.h"
#include "content/public/common/content_switches.h"
#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
@@ -17,25 +20,38 @@ namespace content {
class ServiceWorkerDispatcherHostTest : public testing::Test {
protected:
+ ServiceWorkerDispatcherHostTest()
+ : io_thread_(BrowserThread::IO, &message_loop_) {}
+
virtual void SetUp() {
- context_.reset(new ServiceWorkerContextCore(base::FilePath(), NULL));
+ context_wrapper_ = new ServiceWorkerContextWrapper;
+ context_wrapper_->Init(base::FilePath(), NULL);
}
virtual void TearDown() {
- context_.reset();
+ if (context_wrapper_) {
+ context_wrapper_->Shutdown();
+ context_wrapper_ = NULL;
+ }
}
- scoped_ptr<ServiceWorkerContextCore> context_;
+ ServiceWorkerContextCore* context() { return context_wrapper_->context(); }
+
+ scoped_refptr<ServiceWorkerContextWrapper> context_wrapper_;
+ base::MessageLoopForIO message_loop_;
+ BrowserThreadImpl io_thread_;
};
static const int kRenderProcessId = 1;
class TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost : public ServiceWorkerDispatcherHost {
public:
- TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost(int process_id,
- ServiceWorkerContextCore* context)
- : ServiceWorkerDispatcherHost(process_id) {
- context_ = context->AsWeakPtr();
+ TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost(
+ int process_id,
+ ServiceWorkerContextWrapper* context_wrapper)
+ : ServiceWorkerDispatcherHost(process_id),
+ bad_messages_received_count_(0) {
+ Init(context_wrapper);
}
virtual bool Send(IPC::Message* message) OVERRIDE {
@@ -43,7 +59,12 @@ class TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost : public ServiceWorkerDispatcherHost {
return true;
}
+ virtual void BadMessageReceived() OVERRIDE {
+ ++bad_messages_received_count_;
+ }
+
ScopedVector<IPC::Message> sent_messages_;
+ int bad_messages_received_count_;
protected:
virtual ~TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost() {}
@@ -54,17 +75,18 @@ TEST_F(ServiceWorkerDispatcherHostTest, DisabledCausesError) {
switches::kEnableServiceWorker));
scoped_refptr<TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost> dispatcher_host =
- new TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost(kRenderProcessId, context_.get());
+ new TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost(kRenderProcessId,
+ context_wrapper_.get());
bool handled;
dispatcher_host->OnMessageReceived(
ServiceWorkerHostMsg_RegisterServiceWorker(-1, -1, GURL(), GURL()),
&handled);
- DCHECK(handled);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(handled);
// TODO(alecflett): Pump the message loop when this becomes async.
- DCHECK_EQ(1UL, dispatcher_host->sent_messages_.size());
- DCHECK_EQ(
+ ASSERT_EQ(1UL, dispatcher_host->sent_messages_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(
static_cast<uint32>(ServiceWorkerMsg_ServiceWorkerRegistrationError::ID),
dispatcher_host->sent_messages_[0]->type());
}
@@ -76,17 +98,18 @@ TEST_F(ServiceWorkerDispatcherHostTest, Enabled) {
switches::kEnableServiceWorker);
scoped_refptr<TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost> dispatcher_host =
- new TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost(kRenderProcessId, context_.get());
+ new TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost(kRenderProcessId,
+ context_wrapper_.get());
bool handled;
dispatcher_host->OnMessageReceived(
ServiceWorkerHostMsg_RegisterServiceWorker(-1, -1, GURL(), GURL()),
&handled);
- DCHECK(handled);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(handled);
// TODO(alecflett): Pump the message loop when this becomes async.
- DCHECK_EQ(1UL, dispatcher_host->sent_messages_.size());
- DCHECK_EQ(static_cast<uint32>(ServiceWorkerMsg_ServiceWorkerRegistered::ID),
+ ASSERT_EQ(1UL, dispatcher_host->sent_messages_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<uint32>(ServiceWorkerMsg_ServiceWorkerRegistered::ID),
dispatcher_host->sent_messages_[0]->type());
}
@@ -97,21 +120,72 @@ TEST_F(ServiceWorkerDispatcherHostTest, EarlyContextDeletion) {
switches::kEnableServiceWorker);
scoped_refptr<TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost> dispatcher_host =
- new TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost(kRenderProcessId, context_.get());
+ new TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost(kRenderProcessId,
+ context_wrapper_.get());
- context_.reset();
+ context_wrapper_->Shutdown();
+ context_wrapper_ = NULL;
bool handled;
dispatcher_host->OnMessageReceived(
ServiceWorkerHostMsg_RegisterServiceWorker(-1, -1, GURL(), GURL()),
&handled);
- DCHECK(handled);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(handled);
// TODO(alecflett): Pump the message loop when this becomes async.
- DCHECK_EQ(1UL, dispatcher_host->sent_messages_.size());
- DCHECK_EQ(
+ ASSERT_EQ(1UL, dispatcher_host->sent_messages_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(
static_cast<uint32>(ServiceWorkerMsg_ServiceWorkerRegistrationError::ID),
dispatcher_host->sent_messages_[0]->type());
}
+TEST_F(ServiceWorkerDispatcherHostTest, ProviderCreatedAndDestroyed) {
+ scoped_refptr<TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost> dispatcher_host =
+ new TestingServiceWorkerDispatcherHost(kRenderProcessId,
+ context_wrapper_.get());
+
+ const int kProviderId = 1001; // Test with a value != kRenderProcessId.
+
+ bool handled = false;
+ dispatcher_host->OnMessageReceived(
+ ServiceWorkerHostMsg_ProviderCreated(kProviderId),
+ &handled);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(handled);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(context()->GetProviderHost(kRenderProcessId, kProviderId));
+
+ // Two with the same ID should be seen as a bad message.
+ handled = false;
+ dispatcher_host->OnMessageReceived(
+ ServiceWorkerHostMsg_ProviderCreated(kProviderId),
+ &handled);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(handled);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, dispatcher_host->bad_messages_received_count_);
+
+ handled = false;
+ dispatcher_host->OnMessageReceived(
+ ServiceWorkerHostMsg_ProviderDestroyed(kProviderId),
+ &handled);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(handled);
+ EXPECT_FALSE(context()->GetProviderHost(kRenderProcessId, kProviderId));
+
+ // Destroying an ID that does not exist warrants a bad message.
+ handled = false;
+ dispatcher_host->OnMessageReceived(
+ ServiceWorkerHostMsg_ProviderDestroyed(kProviderId),
+ &handled);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(handled);
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, dispatcher_host->bad_messages_received_count_);
+
+ // Deletion of the dispatcher_host should cause providers for that
+ // process to get deleted as well.
+ dispatcher_host->OnMessageReceived(
+ ServiceWorkerHostMsg_ProviderCreated(kProviderId),
+ &handled);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(handled);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(context()->GetProviderHost(kRenderProcessId, kProviderId));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(dispatcher_host->HasOneRef());
+ dispatcher_host = NULL;
+ EXPECT_FALSE(context()->GetProviderHost(kRenderProcessId, kProviderId));
+}
+
} // namespace content

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698