Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(416)

Unified Diff: LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/chromium/postmessage-after-terminate.html

Issue 695643002: Add terminateServiceWorker method for layout tests - blink side (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink.git@master
Patch Set: Created 6 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/chromium/postmessage-after-terminate.html
diff --git a/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/chromium/postmessage-after-terminate.html b/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/chromium/postmessage-after-terminate.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f663e6496daf54265326f49f777ce6fdf4e414c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/chromium/postmessage-after-terminate.html
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<title>Tests that postMessage works during and after terminating a service worker</title>
+<script src="../../resources/testharness.js"></script>
+<script src="../../resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>
+<script src="../../resources/testharness-helpers.js"></script>
+<script src="../resources/test-helpers.js"></script>
+<script>
+var properties = {timeout: 2500};
+
+function sendPing(worker) {
+ return new Promise(function(resolve) {
+ var channel = new MessageChannel();
dominicc (has gone to gerrit) 2014/11/17 02:25:26 Could you indent this slightly differently, follow
Marijn Kruisselbrink 2014/11/17 23:18:44 Done (at least I think so).
+ channel.port1.onmessage = function(message) {
+ resolve(message.data);
+ };
+ worker.postMessage({port: channel.port2}, [channel.port2]);
+ });
+}
+
+function delay(ms) {
+ return new Promise(function(resolve) {
+ window.setTimeout(resolve, ms);
+ });
+}
+
+promise_test(function(test) {
+ var worker = 'resources/ping-worker.js';
+ var scope = 'resources/blank.html';
+ var sw;
+ return service_worker_unregister_and_register(test, worker, scope)
+ .then(function(registration) {
+ return wait_for_update(test, registration);
+ }).then(function(worker) {
+ sw = worker;
+ return sendPing(sw);
+ }).then(function(reply) {
+ assert_equals(reply, 1);
+ return internals.terminateServiceWorker(sw);
dominicc (has gone to gerrit) 2014/11/17 02:25:25 What if the Service Worker terminated itself, perh
Marijn Kruisselbrink 2014/11/17 23:18:44 I suppose I could change the test to have the work
+ }).then(function() {
+ //return delay(500);
Marijn Kruisselbrink 2014/11/04 23:11:54 This test currently only passes when this delay is
dominicc (has gone to gerrit) 2014/11/17 02:25:25 Let's not add a test that is known to be broken. O
Marijn Kruisselbrink 2014/11/17 23:18:44 Well, the test is not broken, it just doesn't curr
+ }).then(function() {
+ return sendPing(sw);
+ }).then(function(reply) {
+ assert_equals(reply, 1);
+ return sendPing(sw);
dominicc (has gone to gerrit) 2014/11/17 02:25:25 Are two subsequent pings necessary?
Marijn Kruisselbrink 2014/11/17 23:18:44 Not really, just a simple sanity check to make sur
+ }).then(function(reply) {
+ assert_equals(reply, 2);
+ return service_worker_unregister_and_done(test, scope);
+ });
+ }, 'Terminate terminates the worker.', properties);
dominicc (has gone to gerrit) 2014/11/17 02:25:25 Is the test really about that? It's about postMess
Marijn Kruisselbrink 2014/11/17 23:18:44 Well, it's more about both. I started writing this
+
+</script>

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698