| Index: third_party/sqlite/src/test/analyze7.test
|
| diff --git a/third_party/sqlite/src/test/analyze7.test b/third_party/sqlite/src/test/analyze7.test
|
| new file mode 100644
|
| index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4892a2233a16537e71a5f62e76bf1269b072d548
|
| --- /dev/null
|
| +++ b/third_party/sqlite/src/test/analyze7.test
|
| @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
|
| +# 2011 April 1
|
| +#
|
| +# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
|
| +# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
|
| +#
|
| +# May you do good and not evil.
|
| +# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
|
| +# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
|
| +#
|
| +#***********************************************************************
|
| +# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.
|
| +# This file implements tests for the ANALYZE command when an idnex
|
| +# name is given as the argument.
|
| +#
|
| +
|
| +set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
|
| +source $testdir/tester.tcl
|
| +
|
| +# There is nothing to test if ANALYZE is disable for this build.
|
| +#
|
| +ifcapable {!analyze||!vtab} {
|
| + finish_test
|
| + return
|
| +}
|
| +
|
| +# Generate some test data
|
| +#
|
| +do_test analyze7-1.0 {
|
| + register_wholenumber_module db
|
| + execsql {
|
| + CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c,d);
|
| + CREATE INDEX t1a ON t1(a);
|
| + CREATE INDEX t1b ON t1(b);
|
| + CREATE INDEX t1cd ON t1(c,d);
|
| + CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE nums USING wholenumber;
|
| + INSERT INTO t1 SELECT value, value, value/100, value FROM nums
|
| + WHERE value BETWEEN 1 AND 256;
|
| + EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=123;
|
| + }
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1a (a=?) (~10 rows)}}
|
| +do_test analyze7-1.1 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=123;}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1b (b=?) (~10 rows)}}
|
| +do_test analyze7-1.2 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c=2;}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1cd (c=?) (~10 rows)}}
|
| +
|
| +# Run an analyze on one of the three indices. Verify that this
|
| +# effects the row-count estimate on the one query that uses that
|
| +# one index.
|
| +#
|
| +do_test analyze7-2.0 {
|
| + execsql {ANALYZE t1a;}
|
| + db cache flush
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=123;}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1a (a=?) (~1 rows)}}
|
| +do_test analyze7-2.1 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=123;}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1b (b=?) (~10 rows)}}
|
| +do_test analyze7-2.2 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c=2;}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1cd (c=?) (~10 rows)}}
|
| +
|
| +# Verify that since the query planner now things that t1a is more
|
| +# selective than t1b, it prefers to use t1a.
|
| +#
|
| +do_test analyze7-2.3 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=123 AND b=123}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1a (a=?) (~1 rows)}}
|
| +
|
| +# Run an analysis on another of the three indices. Verify that this
|
| +# new analysis works and does not disrupt the previous analysis.
|
| +#
|
| +do_test analyze7-3.0 {
|
| + execsql {ANALYZE t1cd;}
|
| + db cache flush;
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=123;}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1a (a=?) (~1 rows)}}
|
| +do_test analyze7-3.1 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE b=123;}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1b (b=?) (~10 rows)}}
|
| +do_test analyze7-3.2.1 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c=?;}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1cd (c=?) (~86 rows)}}
|
| +ifcapable stat2 {
|
| + # If ENABLE_STAT2 is defined, SQLite comes up with a different estimated
|
| + # row count for (c=2) than it does for (c=?).
|
| + do_test analyze7-3.2.2 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c=2;}
|
| + } {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1cd (c=?) (~51 rows)}}
|
| +} else {
|
| + # If ENABLE_STAT2 is not defined, the expected row count for (c=2) is the
|
| + # same as that for (c=?).
|
| + do_test analyze7-3.2.3 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c=2;}
|
| + } {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1cd (c=?) (~86 rows)}}
|
| +}
|
| +do_test analyze7-3.3 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=123 AND b=123}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1a (a=?) (~1 rows)}}
|
| +do_test analyze7-3.4 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c=123 AND b=123}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1b (b=?) (~2 rows)}}
|
| +do_test analyze7-3.5 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a=123 AND c=123}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1a (a=?) (~1 rows)}}
|
| +do_test analyze7-3.6 {
|
| + execsql {EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE c=123 AND d=123 AND b=123}
|
| +} {0 0 0 {SEARCH TABLE t1 USING INDEX t1cd (c=? AND d=?) (~1 rows)}}
|
| +
|
| +finish_test
|
|
|