Get `gn gen` to succeed on Windows

third_party/sqlite/src/test/where4.test

Index: third_party/sqlite/src/test/where4.test
diff --git a/third_party/sqlite/src/test/where4.test b/third_party/sqlite/src/test/where4.test
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..280eb5ff7fb4703fbe5f36c7cfba3e7731ac8c72
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/sqlite/src/test/where4.test
@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
+# 2006 October 27
+#
+# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
+# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
+#
+#    May you do good and not evil.
+#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
+#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
+#
+#***********************************************************************
+# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.  The
+# focus of this file is testing the use of indices in WHERE clauses.
+# This file was created when support for optimizing IS NULL phrases
+# was added.  And so the principle purpose of this file is to test
+# that IS NULL phrases are correctly optimized.  But you can never
+# have too many tests, so some other tests are thrown in as well.
+#
+# $Id: where4.test,v 1.6 2007/12/10 05:03:48 danielk1977 Exp $
+
+set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
+source $testdir/tester.tcl
+
+ifcapable !tclvar||!bloblit {
+  finish_test
+  return
+}
+
+# Build some test data
+#
+do_test where4-1.0 {
+  execsql {
+    CREATE TABLE t1(w, x, y);
+    CREATE INDEX i1wxy ON t1(w,x,y);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,2,3);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,NULL,3);
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('a','b','c');
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('a',NULL,'c');
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(X'78',x'79',x'7a');
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(X'78',NULL,X'7A');
+    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(NULL,NULL,NULL);
+    SELECT count(*) FROM t1;
+  }
+} {7}
+
+# Do an SQL statement.  Append the search count to the end of the result.
+#
+proc count sql {
+  set ::sqlite_search_count 0
+  return [concat [execsql $sql] $::sqlite_search_count]
+}
+
+# Verify that queries use an index.  We are using the special variable
+# "sqlite_search_count" which tallys the number of executions of MoveTo
+# and Next operators in the VDBE.  By verifing that the search count is
+# small we can be assured that indices are being used properly.
+#
+do_test where4-1.1 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w IS NULL}
+} {7 2}
+do_test where4-1.2 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE +w IS NULL}
+} {7 6}
+do_test where4-1.3 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=1 AND x IS NULL}
+} {2 2}
+do_test where4-1.4 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=1 AND +x IS NULL}
+} {2 3}
+do_test where4-1.5 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=1 AND x>0}
+} {1 2}
+do_test where4-1.6 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=1 AND x<9}
+} {1 3}
+do_test where4-1.7 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=1 AND x IS NULL AND y=3}
+} {2 2}
+do_test where4-1.8 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=1 AND x IS NULL AND y>2}
+} {2 2}
+do_test where4-1.9 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w='a' AND x IS NULL AND y='c'}
+} {4 2}
+do_test where4-1.10 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=x'78' AND x IS NULL}
+} {6 2}
+do_test where4-1.11 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=x'78' AND x IS NULL AND y=123}
+} {1}
+do_test where4-1.12 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w=x'78' AND x IS NULL AND y=x'7A'}
+} {6 2}
+do_test where4-1.13 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w IS NULL AND x IS NULL}
+} {7 2}
+do_test where4-1.14 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w IS NULL AND x IS NULL AND y IS NULL}
+} {7 2}
+do_test where4-1.15 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w IS NULL AND x IS NULL AND y<0}
+} {2}
+do_test where4-1.16 {
+  count {SELECT rowid FROM t1 WHERE w IS NULL AND x IS NULL AND y>=0}
+} {1}
+
+do_test where4-2.1 {
+  execsql {SELECT rowid FROM t1 ORDER BY w, x, y}
+} {7 2 1 4 3 6 5}
+do_test where4-2.2 {
+  execsql {SELECT rowid FROM t1 ORDER BY w DESC, x, y}
+} {6 5 4 3 2 1 7}
+do_test where4-2.3 {
+  execsql {SELECT rowid FROM t1 ORDER BY w, x DESC, y}
+} {7 1 2 3 4 5 6}
+
+
+# Ticket #2177
+#
+# Suppose you have a left join where the right table of the left
+# join (the one that can be NULL) has an index on two columns.
+# The first indexed column is used in the ON clause of the join.
+# The second indexed column is used in the WHERE clause with an IS NULL
+# constraint.  It is not allowed to use the IS NULL optimization to
+# optimize the query because the second column might be NULL because
+# the right table did not match - something the index does not know
+# about.
+#
+do_test where4-3.1 {
+  execsql {
+    CREATE TABLE t2(a);
+    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1);
+    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2);
+    INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(3);
+    CREATE TABLE t3(x,y,UNIQUE(x,y));
+    INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1,11);
+    INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(2,NULL);
+ 
+    SELECT * FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t3 ON a=x WHERE +y IS NULL;
+  }
+} {2 2 {} 3 {} {}}
+do_test where4-3.2 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT * FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t3 ON a=x WHERE y IS NULL;
+  }
+} {2 2 {} 3 {} {}}
+
+# Ticket #2189.  Probably the same bug as #2177.
+#
+do_test where4-4.1 {
+  execsql {
+    CREATE TABLE test(col1 TEXT PRIMARY KEY);
+    INSERT INTO test(col1) values('a');
+    INSERT INTO test(col1) values('b');
+    INSERT INTO test(col1) values('c');
+    CREATE TABLE test2(col1 TEXT PRIMARY KEY);
+    INSERT INTO test2(col1) values('a');
+    INSERT INTO test2(col1) values('b');
+    INSERT INTO test2(col1) values('c');
+    SELECT * FROM test t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN test2 t2 ON t1.col1 = t2.col1
+      WHERE +t2.col1 IS NULL;
+  }
+} {}
+do_test where4-4.2 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT * FROM test t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN test2 t2 ON t1.col1 = t2.col1
+      WHERE t2.col1 IS NULL;
+  }
+} {}
+do_test where4-4.3 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT * FROM test t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN test2 t2 ON t1.col1 = t2.col1
+      WHERE +t1.col1 IS NULL;
+  }
+} {}
+do_test where4-4.4 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT * FROM test t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN test2 t2 ON t1.col1 = t2.col1
+      WHERE t1.col1 IS NULL;
+  }
+} {}
+
+# Ticket #2273.  Problems with IN operators and NULLs.
+#
+ifcapable subquery {
+do_test where4-5.1 {
+  execsql {
+    CREATE TABLE t4(x,y,z,PRIMARY KEY(x,y));
+  }
+  execsql {
+    SELECT *
+      FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t4 b1
+              LEFT JOIN t4 b2 ON b2.x=b1.x AND b2.y IN (b1.y);
+  }
+} {1 {} {} {} {} {} {} 2 {} {} {} {} {} {} 3 {} {} {} {} {} {}}
+do_test where4-5.2 {
+  execsql {
+    INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(1,1,11);
+    INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(1,2,12);
+    INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(1,3,13);
+    INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(2,2,22);
+    SELECT rowid FROM t4 WHERE x IN (1,9,2,5) AND y IN (1,3,NULL,2) AND z!=13;
+  }
+} {1 2 4}
+do_test where4-5.3 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT rowid FROM t4 WHERE x IN (1,9,NULL,2) AND y IN (1,3,2) AND z!=13;
+  }
+} {1 2 4}
+do_test where4-6.1 {
+  execsql {
+    CREATE TABLE t5(a,b,c,d,e,f,UNIQUE(a,b,c,d,e,f));
+    INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(1,1,1,1,1,11111);
+    INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(2,2,2,2,2,22222);
+    INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(1,2,3,4,5,12345);
+    INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(2,3,4,5,6,23456);
+  }
+  execsql {
+    SELECT rowid FROM t5
+     WHERE a IN (1,9,2) AND b=2 AND c IN (1,2,3,4) AND d>0
+  }
+} {3 2}
+do_test where4-6.2 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT rowid FROM t5
+     WHERE a IN (1,NULL,2) AND b=2 AND c IN (1,2,3,4) AND d>0
+  }
+} {3 2}
+do_test where4-7.1 {
+  execsql {
+    CREATE TABLE t6(y,z,PRIMARY KEY(y,z));
+  }
+  execsql {
+    SELECT * FROM t6 WHERE y=NULL AND z IN ('hello');
+  }
+} {}
+
+integrity_check {where4-99.0}
+
+do_test where4-7.1 {
+  execsql {
+    BEGIN;
+    CREATE TABLE t8(a, b, c, d);
+    CREATE INDEX t8_i ON t8(a, b, c);
+    CREATE TABLE t7(i);
+
+    INSERT INTO t7 VALUES(1);
+    INSERT INTO t7 SELECT i*2 FROM t7;
+    INSERT INTO t7 SELECT i*2 FROM t7;
+    INSERT INTO t7 SELECT i*2 FROM t7;
+    INSERT INTO t7 SELECT i*2 FROM t7;
+    INSERT INTO t7 SELECT i*2 FROM t7;
+    INSERT INTO t7 SELECT i*2 FROM t7;
+
+    COMMIT;
+  }
+} {}
+
+# At one point the sub-select inside the aggregate sum() function in the
+# following query was leaking a couple of stack entries. This query 
+# runs the SELECT in a loop enough times that an assert() fails. Or rather,
+# did fail before the bug was fixed.
+#
+do_test where4-7.2 {
+  execsql {
+    SELECT sum((
+      SELECT d FROM t8 WHERE a = i AND b = i AND c < NULL
+    )) FROM t7;
+  }
+} {{}}
+
+}; #ifcapable subquery
+
+finish_test