Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(207)

Unified Diff: net/cert/multi_log_ct_verifier.cc

Issue 67513008: Certificate Transparency: Add the high-level interface for verifying SCTs over multiple logs (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Addressing review comments. Created 7 years, 1 month ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: net/cert/multi_log_ct_verifier.cc
diff --git a/net/cert/multi_log_ct_verifier.cc b/net/cert/multi_log_ct_verifier.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49a73ce57c346dc3d662a47065c36993c0b2d9d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/cert/multi_log_ct_verifier.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+// Copyright 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "net/cert/multi_log_ct_verifier.h"
+
+#include "net/base/net_errors.h"
+#include "net/cert/ct_log_verifier.h"
+#include "net/cert/ct_objects_extractor.h"
+#include "net/cert/ct_serialization.h"
+#include "net/cert/ct_verify_result.h"
+#include "net/cert/x509_certificate.h"
+
+namespace net {
+
+MultiLogCTVerifier::MultiLogCTVerifier() { }
+
+MultiLogCTVerifier::~MultiLogCTVerifier() { }
+
+void MultiLogCTVerifier::AddLog(scoped_ptr<CTLogVerifier> log_verifier) {
+ if (!log_verifier)
+ return;
wtc 2013/11/21 23:26:34 Are you sure we need to allow a null |log_verifier
Eran M. (Google) 2013/11/23 21:02:07 No, but I wouldn't want to crash here in productio
wtc 2013/11/25 23:15:50 A crash may help expose a bug sooner. If we know n
+
+ std::string log_id(log_verifier->key_id());
+ logs_[log_id].reset(log_verifier.release());
+}
+
+int MultiLogCTVerifier::Verify(
+ X509Certificate* cert,
+ const std::string& sct_list_from_ocsp,
+ const std::string& sct_list_from_tls_extension,
+ ct::CTVerifyResult* result) {
+ DCHECK(cert);
+ DCHECK(result);
+
+ result->verified_scts.clear();
+ result->unverified_scts.clear();
+ result->unknown_logs_scts.clear();
+
+ bool has_verified_scts = false;
+
+ std::string embedded_scts;
+ if (!cert->GetIntermediateCertificates().empty() &&
+ ct::ExtractEmbeddedSCTList(
+ cert->os_cert_handle(),
+ &embedded_scts)) {
+ ct::LogEntry precert_entry;
+
+ has_verified_scts =
+ ct::GetPrecertLogEntry(
+ cert->os_cert_handle(),
+ cert->GetIntermediateCertificates().front(),
+ &precert_entry) &&
+ VerifySCTs(
+ embedded_scts,
+ precert_entry,
+ ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED,
+ result);
+ }
+
+ ct::LogEntry x509_entry;
+ if (!ct::GetX509LogEntry(cert->os_cert_handle(), &x509_entry))
+ return has_verified_scts ? OK : ERR_CT_LOG_ENTRY_CREATION_FAILED;
+
+ has_verified_scts |= VerifySCTs(
+ sct_list_from_ocsp,
+ x509_entry,
+ ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_FROM_OCSP_RESPONSE,
+ result);
+
+ has_verified_scts |= VerifySCTs(
+ sct_list_from_tls_extension,
+ x509_entry,
+ ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_FROM_TLS_HANDSHAKE,
+ result);
+
+ if (has_verified_scts)
+ return OK;
+
+ if (!result->unverified_scts.empty())
+ return ERR_NO_SCTS_VERIFIED_OK;
+
+ if (!result->unknown_logs_scts.empty())
+ return ERR_NO_SCTS_FROM_KNOWN_LOGS;
+
+ return ERR_NO_SCTS_PRESENT;
wtc 2013/11/21 23:26:34 It should be sufficient to just use one error code
Eran M. (Google) 2013/11/23 21:02:07 Will be done in the next patch, when I introduce t
+}
+
+bool MultiLogCTVerifier::VerifySCTs(
+ const std::string& encoded_sct_list,
+ const ct::LogEntry& expected_entry,
+ ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::Origin origin,
+ ct::CTVerifyResult* result) {
+ if (logs_.empty())
+ return false;
+
+ base::StringPiece temp(encoded_sct_list);
+ std::vector<base::StringPiece> sct_list;
+
+ if (!ct::DecodeSCTList(&temp, &sct_list))
+ return false;
+
+ bool verified = false;
+ for (std::vector<base::StringPiece>::const_iterator it = sct_list.begin();
+ it != sct_list.end(); ++it) {
+ base::StringPiece encoded_sct(*it);
+ ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp decoded_sct;
+ if (!DecodeSignedCertificateTimestamp(&encoded_sct, &decoded_sct)) {
+ // XXX(rsleevi): Should we really just skip over bad SCTs?
+ continue;
+ }
+ decoded_sct.origin = origin;
+
+ verified |= VerifySingleSCT(decoded_sct, expected_entry, result);
+ }
+
+ return verified;
+}
+
+bool MultiLogCTVerifier::VerifySingleSCT(
+ const ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp& sct,
+ const ct::LogEntry& expected_entry,
+ ct::CTVerifyResult* result) {
+
+ // Assume this SCT is untrusted until proven otherwise.
+
+ IDToLogMap::iterator it = logs_.find(sct.log_id);
+ if (it == logs_.end()) {
+ DVLOG(1) << "SCT does not match any known log.";
+ result->unknown_logs_scts.push_back(sct);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (!it->second->Verify(expected_entry, sct)) {
+ DVLOG(1) << "Unable to verify SCT signature.";
+ result->unverified_scts.push_back(sct);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ // SCT verified ok, just make sure the timestamp is legitimate.
+ // Add 1 second to allow some slack for accepting SCTs which have *Just*
+ // been issued.
wtc 2013/11/21 23:26:34 1. The comment in the reference implementation say
Eran M. (Google) 2013/11/23 21:02:07 I've dropped this 1 second interval entirely. You'
+ if (sct.timestamp + base::TimeDelta::FromSeconds(1) > base::Time::Now()) {
+ DVLOG(1) << "SCT is from the future!";
+ result->unverified_scts.push_back(sct);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ result->verified_scts.push_back(sct);
+ return true;
+}
+
+} // namespace net

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698