Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(92)

Unified Diff: sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_test_runner.cc

Issue 670183003: Update from chromium 62675d9fb31fb8cedc40f68e78e8445a74f362e7 (Closed) Base URL: git@github.com:domokit/mojo.git@master
Patch Set: Created 6 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_test_runner.h ('k') | sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/syscall.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_test_runner.cc
diff --git a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_test_runner.cc b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_test_runner.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19d3e8a27c24027f5476b8e7610b747bb1a4dcfe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_test_runner.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_test_runner.h"
+
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
+
+#include "base/logging.h"
+#include "base/memory/scoped_ptr.h"
+#include "sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/bpf_dsl.h"
+#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/die.h"
+#include "sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf.h"
+#include "sandbox/linux/tests/unit_tests.h"
+
+namespace sandbox {
+
+SandboxBPFTestRunner::SandboxBPFTestRunner(
+ BPFTesterDelegate* bpf_tester_delegate)
+ : bpf_tester_delegate_(bpf_tester_delegate) {
+}
+
+SandboxBPFTestRunner::~SandboxBPFTestRunner() {
+}
+
+void SandboxBPFTestRunner::Run() {
+ DCHECK(bpf_tester_delegate_);
+ sandbox::Die::EnableSimpleExit();
+
+ scoped_ptr<bpf_dsl::SandboxBPFDSLPolicy> policy =
+ bpf_tester_delegate_->GetSandboxBPFPolicy();
+
+ if (sandbox::SandboxBPF::SupportsSeccompSandbox(-1) ==
+ sandbox::SandboxBPF::STATUS_AVAILABLE) {
+ // Ensure the the sandbox is actually available at this time
+ int proc_fd;
+ SANDBOX_ASSERT((proc_fd = open("/proc", O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY)) >= 0);
+ SANDBOX_ASSERT(sandbox::SandboxBPF::SupportsSeccompSandbox(proc_fd) ==
+ sandbox::SandboxBPF::STATUS_AVAILABLE);
+
+ // Initialize and then start the sandbox with our custom policy
+ sandbox::SandboxBPF sandbox;
+ sandbox.set_proc_fd(proc_fd);
+ sandbox.SetSandboxPolicy(policy.release());
+ SANDBOX_ASSERT(
+ sandbox.StartSandbox(sandbox::SandboxBPF::PROCESS_SINGLE_THREADED));
+
+ // Run the actual test.
+ bpf_tester_delegate_->RunTestFunction();
+ } else {
+ printf("This BPF test is not fully running in this configuration!\n");
+ // Android and Valgrind are the only configurations where we accept not
+ // having kernel BPF support.
+ if (!IsAndroid() && !IsRunningOnValgrind()) {
+ const bool seccomp_bpf_is_supported = false;
+ SANDBOX_ASSERT(seccomp_bpf_is_supported);
+ }
+ // Call the compiler and verify the policy. That's the least we can do,
+ // if we don't have kernel support.
+ sandbox::SandboxBPF sandbox;
+ sandbox.SetSandboxPolicy(policy.release());
+ sandbox.AssembleFilter(true /* force_verification */);
+ sandbox::UnitTests::IgnoreThisTest();
+ }
+}
+
+bool SandboxBPFTestRunner::ShouldCheckForLeaks() const {
+ // LSAN requires being able to use ptrace() and other system calls that could
+ // be denied.
+ return false;
+}
+
+} // namespace sandbox
« no previous file with comments | « sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/sandbox_bpf_test_runner.h ('k') | sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/syscall.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698