Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(892)

Unified Diff: sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/verifier.h

Issue 670183003: Update from chromium 62675d9fb31fb8cedc40f68e78e8445a74f362e7 (Closed) Base URL: git@github.com:domokit/mojo.git@master
Patch Set: Created 6 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/trap.cc ('k') | sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/verifier.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/verifier.h
diff --git a/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/verifier.h b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/verifier.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66a3ee0f568e06e2199519189c50a469bf42d483
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/verifier.h
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#ifndef SANDBOX_LINUX_SECCOMP_BPF_VERIFIER_H__
+#define SANDBOX_LINUX_SECCOMP_BPF_VERIFIER_H__
+
+#include <stdint.h>
+
+#include <vector>
+
+#include "base/macros.h"
+
+struct sock_filter;
+
+namespace sandbox {
+struct arch_seccomp_data;
+namespace bpf_dsl {
+class SandboxBPFDSLPolicy;
+class PolicyCompiler;
+}
+
+class Verifier {
+ public:
+ // Evaluate the BPF program for all possible inputs and verify that it
+ // computes the correct result. We use the "evaluators" to determine
+ // the full set of possible inputs that we have to iterate over.
+ // Returns success, if the BPF filter accurately reflects the rules
+ // set by the "evaluators".
+ // Upon success, "err" is set to NULL. Upon failure, it contains a static
+ // error message that does not need to be free()'d.
+ static bool VerifyBPF(bpf_dsl::PolicyCompiler* compiler,
+ const std::vector<struct sock_filter>& program,
+ const bpf_dsl::SandboxBPFDSLPolicy& policy,
+ const char** err);
+
+ // Evaluate a given BPF program for a particular set of system call
+ // parameters. If evaluation failed for any reason, "err" will be set to
+ // a non-NULL error string. Otherwise, the BPF program's result will be
+ // returned by the function and "err" is NULL.
+ // We do not actually implement the full BPF state machine, but only the
+ // parts that can actually be generated by our BPF compiler. If this code
+ // is used for purposes other than verifying the output of the sandbox's
+ // BPF compiler, we might have to extend this BPF interpreter.
+ static uint32_t EvaluateBPF(const std::vector<struct sock_filter>& program,
+ const struct arch_seccomp_data& data,
+ const char** err);
+
+ private:
+ DISALLOW_IMPLICIT_CONSTRUCTORS(Verifier);
+};
+
+} // namespace sandbox
+
+#endif // SANDBOX_LINUX_SECCOMP_BPF_VERIFIER_H__
« no previous file with comments | « sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/trap.cc ('k') | sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/verifier.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698