cc: Support texture rect targets for masks

cc/test/layer_tree_test.cc

Index: cc/test/layer_tree_test.cc
diff --git a/cc/test/layer_tree_test.cc b/cc/test/layer_tree_test.cc
index cebfecf8c621e8599a204dd46888a70234a27ef6..d621e5463b7ed2b17990b2d2c5281a14f9e064a0 100644
--- a/cc/test/layer_tree_test.cc
+++ b/cc/test/layer_tree_test.cc
@@ -146,6 +146,18 @@ class LayerTreeHostImplForTesting : public LayerTreeHostImpl {
         block_notify_ready_to_activate_for_testing_(false),
         notify_ready_to_activate_was_blocked_(false) {}
 
+  void CreateResourceAndRasterWorkerPool(
+      scoped_ptr<RasterWorkerPool>* raster_worker_pool,
+      scoped_ptr<ResourcePool>* resource_pool,
+      scoped_ptr<ResourcePool>* staging_resource_pool) override {
+    test_hooks_->CreateResourceAndRasterWorkerPool(
+        this, raster_worker_pool, resource_pool, staging_resource_pool);
+    if (!*resource_pool) {

[reveman, 2014/10/23 20:39:27]

Can we have a default TestHooks implementation instead of this fallback?

[enne (OOO), 2014/10/24 22:21:28]

Sure.

+      LayerTreeHostImpl::CreateResourceAndRasterWorkerPool(
+          raster_worker_pool, resource_pool, staging_resource_pool);
+    }
+  }
+
   void WillBeginImplFrame(const BeginFrameArgs& args) override {
     LayerTreeHostImpl::WillBeginImplFrame(args);
     test_hooks_->WillBeginImplFrameOnThread(this, args);
@@ -398,7 +410,8 @@ class LayerTreeHostForTesting : public LayerTreeHost {
 };
 
 LayerTreeTest::LayerTreeTest()
-    : beginning_(false),
+    : output_surface_(nullptr),
+      beginning_(false),
       end_when_begin_returns_(false),
       timed_out_(false),
       scheduled_(false),