|
|
DescriptionStop using AutoScratchTexture.
BUG=skia:2889
Committed: https://crrev.com/0ed1df255da6f2cc29ecb8e2df8adbb615127471
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#299936}
Patch Set 1 #
Total comments: 4
Patch Set 2 : Remove SkCanvas raw ptrs. #Messages
Total messages: 14 (3 generated)
bsalomon@google.com changed reviewers: + danakj@chromium.org, senorblanco@chromium.org
Also addresses post-commit comments from: https://codereview.chromium.org/520793002/
https://codereview.chromium.org/662623003/diff/1/cc/output/gl_renderer.cc File cc/output/gl_renderer.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/662623003/diff/1/cc/output/gl_renderer.cc#new... cc/output/gl_renderer.cc:677: SkCanvas* canvas = surface->getCanvas(); can you leave this as it was? using SharePtr makes it explicit that we did the research and aren't leaking a SkRefCnt object here. we use a "no raw SkRefCnt pointers" to avoid leaks/UAFs https://codereview.chromium.org/662623003/diff/1/cc/output/gl_renderer.cc#new... cc/output/gl_renderer.cc:841: SkCanvas* canvas = surface->getCanvas(); ditto
LGTM
https://codereview.chromium.org/662623003/diff/1/cc/output/gl_renderer.cc File cc/output/gl_renderer.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/662623003/diff/1/cc/output/gl_renderer.cc#new... cc/output/gl_renderer.cc:677: SkCanvas* canvas = surface->getCanvas(); On 2014/10/16 15:34:01, danakj wrote: > can you leave this as it was? using SharePtr makes it explicit that we did the > research and aren't leaking a SkRefCnt object here. we use a "no raw SkRefCnt > pointers" to avoid leaks/UAFs Done. https://codereview.chromium.org/662623003/diff/1/cc/output/gl_renderer.cc#new... cc/output/gl_renderer.cc:841: SkCanvas* canvas = surface->getCanvas(); On 2014/10/16 15:34:01, danakj wrote: > ditto Done.
Thanks, LGTM
The CQ bit was checked by bsalomon@google.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/662623003/20001
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Committed patchset #2 (id:20001)
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as https://crrev.com/0ed1df255da6f2cc29ecb8e2df8adbb615127471 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#299936}
Message was sent while issue was closed.
sungmann.cho@navercorp.com changed reviewers: + sungmann.cho@navercorp.com
Message was sent while issue was closed.
This CL breaks current ToT. ../../cc/output/gl_renderer.cc:665:49: error: no member named 'refScratchTexture' in 'GrContext' skia::AdoptRef(use_gr_context->context()->refScratchTexture( ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ../../cc/output/gl_renderer.cc:826:49: error: no member named 'refScratchTexture' in 'GrContext' skia::AdoptRef(use_gr_context->context()->refScratchTexture( ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2014/10/18 15:10:18, Sungmann Cho wrote: > This CL breaks current ToT. > > ../../cc/output/gl_renderer.cc:665:49: error: no member named > 'refScratchTexture' in 'GrContext' > skia::AdoptRef(use_gr_context->context()->refScratchTexture( > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ > ../../cc/output/gl_renderer.cc:826:49: error: no member named > 'refScratchTexture' in 'GrContext' > skia::AdoptRef(use_gr_context->context()->refScratchTexture( > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ Hm, it passed the bots.. you sure you don't need to gclient sync a skia roll?
Message was sent while issue was closed.
On 2014/10/18 17:55:12, danakj wrote: > On 2014/10/18 15:10:18, Sungmann Cho wrote: > > This CL breaks current ToT. > > > > ../../cc/output/gl_renderer.cc:665:49: error: no member named > > 'refScratchTexture' in 'GrContext' > > skia::AdoptRef(use_gr_context->context()->refScratchTexture( > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ > > ../../cc/output/gl_renderer.cc:826:49: error: no member named > > 'refScratchTexture' in 'GrContext' > > skia::AdoptRef(use_gr_context->context()->refScratchTexture( > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ > > Hm, it passed the bots.. you sure you don't need to gclient sync a skia roll? Oops. I missed gclient sync. Sorry about that! :( |