[Android] Test runner for python unit tests.

build/android/buildbot/bb_device_steps.py

 #!/usr/bin/env python
 # Copyright (c) 2013 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
 # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
 # found in the LICENSE file.
 
 import collections
 import glob
 import hashlib
 import json
 import os
@@ skipping 59 matching lines @@
       constants.CHROME_SHELL_HOST_DRIVEN_DIR),
     I('AndroidWebView',
       'AndroidWebView.apk',
       'org.chromium.android_webview.shell',
       'AndroidWebViewTest',
       'webview:android_webview/test/data/device_files'),
     ])
 
 VALID_TESTS = set(['chromedriver', 'chrome_proxy', 'gpu', 'mojo', 'sync',
                    'telemetry_perf_unittests', 'ui', 'unit', 'webkit',
-                   'webkit_layout'])
+                   'webkit_layout', 'python_unittests'])
 
 RunCmd = bb_utils.RunCmd
 
 
 def _GetRevision(options):
   """Get the SVN revision number.
 
   Args:
     options: options object.
 
@@ skipping 433 matching lines @@
   RunCmd(['content/test/gpu/run_gpu_test.py',
           'gpu_rasterization',
           '--browser',
           'android-content-shell',
           '--build-revision',
           str(revision),
           '--test-machine-name',
           EscapeBuilderName(builder_name)])
 
 
+def RunPythonUnitTests(_options):
+  bb_annotations.PrintNamedStep('python_unittests')
+  RunCmd(['build/android/python_test_runner.py'])
+
+
 def GetTestStepCmds():
   return [
       ('chromedriver', RunChromeDriverTests),
       ('chrome_proxy', RunChromeProxyTests),
       ('gpu', RunGPUTests),
       ('mojo', RunMojoTests),
+      ('python_unittests', RunPythonUnitTests),

[klundberg, 2014/10/16 17:50:15]

Seems a little weird to run all Python unit tests in a single step. It makes
sense to group some together but I think at some point it will be weird to just
have this as one step. 

[jbudorick, 2014/10/16 17:55:07]

That's reasonable. How would you suggest grouping them?

This is a discussion that we may also want to have w.r.t. the java unit tests,
which are currently also set to run monolithically.

[klundberg, 2014/10/16 18:09:19]

Not sure exactly what tests we have but something like:
- device-related unit tests
- test runner unit tests
- ...
Or maybe have one for core pylib and others for non-pylib? Not sure what makes
sense?

       ('sync', RunChromeSyncShellTests),
       ('telemetry_perf_unittests', RunTelemetryPerfUnitTests),
       ('ui', RunInstrumentationTests),
       ('unit', RunUnitTests),
       ('webkit', RunWebkitTests),
       ('webkit_layout', RunWebkitLayoutTests),
   ]
 
 
 def MakeGSPath(options, gs_base_dir):
@@ skipping 182 matching lines @@
 
   if options.coverage_bucket:
     setattr(options, 'coverage_dir',
             os.path.join(CHROME_OUT_DIR, options.target, 'coverage'))
 
   MainTestWrapper(options)
 
 
 if __name__ == '__main__':
   sys.exit(main(sys.argv))