mojom: Add conformance tests for map<>.

mojo/public/interfaces/bindings/tests/validation_test_interfaces.mojom

 // Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
 // found in the LICENSE file.
 
 
 [JavaPackage="org.chromium.mojo.bindings.test.mojom.mojo"]
 module mojo.test {
 
 struct StructA {
   uint64 i;
@@ skipping 24 matching lines @@
   Method0(float param0);
   Method1(StructA param0);
   Method2(StructB param0, StructA param1);
   Method3(array<bool> param0);
   Method4(StructC param0, array<uint8> param1);
   Method5(StructE param0, handle<data_pipe_producer> param1);
   Method6(array<array<uint8>> param0);
   Method7(StructF param0, array<uint8, 5> param1);
   Method8(array<array<string>?> param0);
   Method9(array<array<handle?>>? param0);
+  Method10(map<string, uint8> param0);

[yzshen1, 2014/10/15 18:07:44]

(optional) It would be nice to have a test for more complex scenario, for
example
map<int8, array<uint8, 5>>
to make sure that fixed-size array validation works correctly.

[Elliot Glaysher, 2014/10/15 19:29:52]

I tried making a test case for that, but it doesn't work because of the current
restriction on arrays of fixed sized arrays.

 };
 
 struct BasicStruct {
   int32 a;
 };
 
 [Client=IntegrationTestInterface2]
 interface IntegrationTestInterface1 {
   Method0(BasicStruct param0);
 };
 
 [Client=IntegrationTestInterface1]
 interface IntegrationTestInterface2 {
   Method0() => (array<uint8> param0);
 };
 
 }