Enforce handle ownership in base::Process

base/process/process_unittest.cc

+// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "base/process/process.h"
+
+#include "base/process/kill.h"
+#include "base/test/multiprocess_test.h"
+#include "base/test/test_timeouts.h"
+#include "base/threading/platform_thread.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+#include "testing/multiprocess_func_list.h"
+
+
+namespace {
+
+#if defined(OS_WIN)
+const int kExpectedStillRunningExitCode = 0x102;
+#else
+const int kExpectedStillRunningExitCode = 0;
+#endif
+
+}  // namespace
+
+class ProcessTest : public base::MultiProcessTest {
+};
+
+TEST_F(ProcessTest, Create) {
+  base::Process process(SpawnChild("SimpleChildProcess"));

[Lei Zhang, 2014/10/16 02:50:08]

nit: put the entire test in namespace base.

[rvargas (doing something else), 2014/10/16 19:06:10]

:(  I like to treat tests as consumers of the code being tested, not part of it.

done

+  ASSERT_TRUE(process.IsValid());
+  ASSERT_FALSE(process.is_current());
+  process.Close();
+  ASSERT_FALSE(process.IsValid());
+}
+
+TEST_F(ProcessTest, CreateCurrent) {
+  base::Process process = base::Process::Current();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(process.IsValid());
+  ASSERT_TRUE(process.is_current());
+  process.Close();
+  ASSERT_FALSE(process.IsValid());
+}
+
+TEST_F(ProcessTest, Move) {
+  base::Process process1(SpawnChild("SimpleChildProcess"));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(process1.IsValid());
+
+  base::Process process2;
+  EXPECT_FALSE(process2.IsValid());
+
+  process2 = process1.Pass();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(process2.IsValid());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(process1.IsValid());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(process2.is_current());
+
+  base::Process process3 = base::Process::Current();
+  process2 = process3.Pass();
+  EXPECT_TRUE(process2.is_current());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(process2.IsValid());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(process3.IsValid());
+}
+
+TEST_F(ProcessTest, Duplicate) {
+  base::Process process1(SpawnChild("SimpleChildProcess"));
+  ASSERT_TRUE(process1.IsValid());
+
+  base::Process process2 = process1.Duplicate();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(process1.IsValid());
+  ASSERT_TRUE(process2.IsValid());
+  EXPECT_EQ(process1.pid(), process2.pid());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(process1.is_current());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(process2.is_current());
+
+  process1.Close();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(process2.IsValid());
+}
+
+TEST_F(ProcessTest, DuplicateCurrent) {
+  base::Process process1 = base::Process::Current();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(process1.IsValid());
+
+  base::Process process2 = process1.Duplicate();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(process1.IsValid());
+  ASSERT_TRUE(process2.IsValid());
+  EXPECT_EQ(process1.pid(), process2.pid());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(process1.is_current());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(process2.is_current());
+
+  process1.Close();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(process2.IsValid());
+}
+
+MULTIPROCESS_TEST_MAIN(SleepyChildProcess) {
+  base::PlatformThread::Sleep(TestTimeouts::action_max_timeout());
+  return 0;
+}
+
+TEST_F(ProcessTest, Terminate) {
+  base::Process process(SpawnChild("SleepyChildProcess"));
+  ASSERT_TRUE(process.IsValid());
+
+  const int kDummyExitCode = 42;
+  int exit_code = kDummyExitCode;
+  EXPECT_EQ(base::TERMINATION_STATUS_STILL_RUNNING,
+            base::GetTerminationStatus(process.Handle(), &exit_code));
+  EXPECT_EQ(kExpectedStillRunningExitCode, exit_code);
+
+  exit_code = kDummyExitCode;
+  int kExpectedExitCode = 250;
+  process.Terminate(kExpectedExitCode);
+  base::WaitForSingleProcess(process.Handle(),
+                             TestTimeouts::action_max_timeout());
+
+  EXPECT_NE(base::TERMINATION_STATUS_STILL_RUNNING,
+            base::GetTerminationStatus(process.Handle(), &exit_code));
+#if !defined(OS_POSIX)
+  // The POSIX implementation actually ignores the exit_code.
+  EXPECT_EQ(kExpectedExitCode, exit_code);
+#endif
+}
+
+// Ensure that the priority of a process is restored correctly after
+// backgrounding and restoring.
+// Note: a platform may not be willing or able to lower the priority of
+// a process. The calls to SetProcessBackground should be noops then.
+TEST_F(ProcessTest, SetProcessBackgrounded) {
+  base::Process process(SpawnChild("SimpleChildProcess"));
+  int old_priority = process.GetPriority();
+#if defined(OS_WIN)
+  EXPECT_TRUE(process.SetProcessBackgrounded(true));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(process.IsProcessBackgrounded());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(process.SetProcessBackgrounded(false));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(process.IsProcessBackgrounded());
+#else
+  process.SetProcessBackgrounded(true);
+  process.SetProcessBackgrounded(false);
+#endif
+  int new_priority = process.GetPriority();
+  EXPECT_EQ(old_priority, new_priority);
+}
+
+// Same as SetProcessBackgrounded but to this very process. It uses
+// a different code path at least for Windows.
+TEST_F(ProcessTest, SetProcessBackgroundedSelf) {
+  base::Process process = base::Process::Current();
+  int old_priority = process.GetPriority();
+#if defined(OS_WIN)
+  EXPECT_TRUE(process.SetProcessBackgrounded(true));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(process.IsProcessBackgrounded());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(process.SetProcessBackgrounded(false));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(process.IsProcessBackgrounded());
+#else
+  process.SetProcessBackgrounded(true);
+  process.SetProcessBackgrounded(false);
+#endif
+  int new_priority = process.GetPriority();
+  EXPECT_EQ(old_priority, new_priority);
+}