LayoutTests/fast/events/touch/touch-action-double-remove.html - Issue 647503002: Only unregister touch action handler conditionally

Side by Side Diff

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Side by Side Diff: LayoutTests/fast/events/touch/touch-action-double-remove.html

Issue 647503002: Only unregister touch action handler conditionally (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/blink/trunk

Patch Set: Created 6 years, 2 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

OLD	NEW
(Empty)
	1 <!DOCTYPE html>

	2 <script src="../../../resources/js-test.js"></script>

	3 <style>

	4 * {
	Rick Byers 2014/10/09 19:29:34 does this really need to be * (that's rare) or is does this really need to be * (that's rare) or is the <source> tag you're targeting explicitly? The more clear the test can be about what scenario triggers the problem the better IMHO.
	5 touch-action:none;

	6 }

	7 </style>

	8 <script>

	9 onload = function() {
	Rick Byers 2014/10/09 19:29:34 please add a description() - i.e. what exactly is please add a description() - i.e. what exactly is this doing to trigger a premature touch-action removal?
	10 document.writeln('PASS');

	11 }

	12 </script>

	13 <source onerror="foo()">
	Rick Byers 2014/10/09 19:29:34 I thought <source> was only valid inside of <pictu I thought <source> was only valid inside of <picture>, <audio> and <video>. Is an invalid <source> tag part of the repro steps somehow?
OLD	NEW

« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | Source/core/rendering/RenderObject.cpp » ('j') | no next file with comments »