Change usage of naclcall and nacljmp pseudo-instructions to match x86 gas

lib/Target/X86/X86InstrNaCl.td

Index: lib/Target/X86/X86InstrNaCl.td
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrNaCl.td b/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrNaCl.td
index a18e642eff8de34b5b08e7ffbae5c2162b1fe6d7..f39f97ea339e490fd00c39457342c4a3ec0eef3b 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrNaCl.td
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrNaCl.td
@@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ let isBranch = 1, isTerminator = 1, isBarrier = 1, isIndirectBranch = 1,
 }
 
 let isCall = 1, isAsmParserOnly = 1 in {
-  def NACL_CALL32d : NaClPI32<(outs), (ins i32imm_pcrel:$dst),
-                     "naclcall\t$dst">;
   def NACL_CALL32r : NaClPI32<(outs), (ins GR32:$dst),
                      "naclcall\t$dst">;
 }
@@ -105,7 +103,7 @@ let isBranch = 1, isTerminator = 1, isBarrier = 1, isIndirectBranch = 1,
 
 let isCall = 1, isAsmParserOnly = 1 in {
   def NACL_CALL64d : NaClPI64<(outs), (ins i32imm_pcrel:$dst),
-                     "naclcall\t$dst">;
+                     "call\t$dst">;

[jvoung (off chromium), 2014/10/15 00:38:14]

Hmm, interesting -- is there no problem w/ this because the type of the
immediate doesn't clash with CALL64pcrel32 ?

[Derek Schuff, 2014/10/15 17:14:13]

No, there doesn't seem to be; I assume that's the reason why.

   def NACL_CALL64r : NaClPI64<(outs), (ins GR32:$dst, GR64:$rZP),
                      "naclcall\t$dst,$rZP">;
 }
@@ -187,7 +185,7 @@ let isBranch = 1, isTerminator = 1, isBarrier = 1, isIndirectBranch = 1 in {
 let isCall = 1, Uses = [RSP] in {
     def NACL_CG_CALL64pcrel32 : I<0, Pseudo, (outs),
                                 (ins i32imm_pcrel:$dst),
-                                "naclcall\t$dst", []>,
+                                "call\t$dst", []>,
                                 Requires<[IsNaCl, In64BitMode]>;
 
     def NACL_CG_CALL64r       : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins GR32:$dst),