Delete old x86 validator.

src/trusted/validator_x86/testdata/64/direct-call-16.test

Index: src/trusted/validator_x86/testdata/64/direct-call-16.test
diff --git a/src/trusted/validator_x86/testdata/64/direct-call-16.test b/src/trusted/validator_x86/testdata/64/direct-call-16.test
deleted file mode 100644
index bcbcdcd07bd629918feb3a2e95fd24ff0decc090..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/src/trusted/validator_x86/testdata/64/direct-call-16.test
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,64 +0,0 @@
-@hex:
-  # This file tests how we handle a 16-bit direct call. In particular, it tests
-  # whether we actually disallow prefix 66 on the direct call.
-  #
-  # Pad with nops, so that call is bundle aligned.
-  90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
-  90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
-  90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
-  90 90 90
-  
-  # Define 16-bit direct call.
-  66 e8 F0 FF
-  
-  # Padding in case the parser of the previous instruction recognizes
-  # the wrong byte length for the jump constant.
-  90 90
-@rval:
-  VALIDATOR: 000000000000001b: 66 e8                                        invalid
-  VALIDATOR: ERROR: Opcode sequence doesn't define a valid x86 instruction
-  VALIDATOR: 000000000000001b: 66 e8                                        invalid
-  VALIDATOR: ERROR: Use of DATA16 (66) prefix for instruction not allowed by Native Client
-  VALIDATOR: 000000000000001d: f0 ff 90                                     invalid
-  VALIDATOR: ERROR: Opcode sequence doesn't define a valid x86 instruction
-  VALIDATOR: Checking jump targets: 0 to 21
-  VALIDATOR: Checking that basic blocks are aligned
-  *** <input> IS UNSAFE ***
-@dis:
-  0000000000000000: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000001: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000002: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000003: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000004: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000005: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000006: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000007: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000008: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000009: 90                                           nop
-  000000000000000a: 90                                           nop
-  000000000000000b: 90                                           nop
-  000000000000000c: 90                                           nop
-  000000000000000d: 90                                           nop
-  000000000000000e: 90                                           nop
-  000000000000000f: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000010: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000011: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000012: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000013: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000014: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000015: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000016: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000017: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000018: 90                                           nop
-  0000000000000019: 90                                           nop
-  000000000000001a: 90                                           nop
-  000000000000001b: 66 e8                                        invalid
-  000000000000001d: f0 ff 90                                     invalid
-  0000000000000020: 90                                           nop
-@rdfa_output:
-  1b: [0] unrecognized instruction
-  return code: 1
-@validators_disagree:
-  errors reported by old validator but not by rdfa one:
-    0x1d - old validator recovered in the middle of the jump
-           instruction, thus second spurious error