Pull in gmock through DEPS

testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc

Index: testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
diff --git a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc b/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
deleted file mode 100644
index 3c076d7c7937406c7a22e429a83f4937f175425a..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/testing/gmock/test/gmock-generated-actions_test.cc
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,1212 +0,0 @@
-// Copyright 2007, Google Inc.
-// All rights reserved.
-//
-// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
-// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
-// met:
-//
-//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
-// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
-//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
-// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
-// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
-// distribution.
-//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
-// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
-// this software without specific prior written permission.
-//
-// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
-// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
-// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
-// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
-// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
-// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
-// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
-// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
-// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
-// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
-// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
-//
-// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
-
-// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
-//
-// This file tests the built-in actions generated by a script.
-
-#include <gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h>
-
-#include <functional>
-#include <sstream>
-#include <string>
-#include <gmock/gmock.h>
-#include <gtest/gtest.h>
-
-namespace testing {
-namespace gmock_generated_actions_test {
-
-using ::std::plus;
-using ::std::string;
-using ::std::tr1::get;
-using ::std::tr1::make_tuple;
-using ::std::tr1::tuple;
-using ::std::tr1::tuple_element;
-using testing::_;
-using testing::Action;
-using testing::ActionInterface;
-using testing::ByRef;
-using testing::DoAll;
-using testing::Invoke;
-using testing::Return;
-using testing::ReturnNew;
-using testing::SetArgumentPointee;
-using testing::StaticAssertTypeEq;
-using testing::Unused;
-using testing::WithArgs;
-
-// For suppressing compiler warnings on conversion possibly losing precision.
-inline short Short(short n) { return n; }  // NOLINT
-inline char Char(char ch) { return ch; }
-
-// Sample functions and functors for testing various actions.
-int Nullary() { return 1; }
-
-class NullaryFunctor {
- public:
-  int operator()() { return 2; }
-};
-
-bool g_done = false;
-
-bool Unary(int x) { return x < 0; }
-
-const char* Plus1(const char* s) { return s + 1; }
-
-bool ByConstRef(const string& s) { return s == "Hi"; }
-
-const double g_double = 0;
-bool ReferencesGlobalDouble(const double& x) { return &x == &g_double; }
-
-string ByNonConstRef(string& s) { return s += "+"; }  // NOLINT
-
-struct UnaryFunctor {
-  int operator()(bool x) { return x ? 1 : -1; }
-};
-
-const char* Binary(const char* input, short n) { return input + n; }  // NOLINT
-
-void VoidBinary(int, char) { g_done = true; }
-
-int Ternary(int x, char y, short z) { return x + y + z; }  // NOLINT
-
-void VoidTernary(int, char, bool) { g_done = true; }
-
-int SumOf4(int a, int b, int c, int d) { return a + b + c + d; }
-
-string Concat4(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
-               const char* s4) {
-  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4;
-}
-
-int SumOf5(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) { return a + b + c + d + e; }
-
-struct SumOf5Functor {
-  int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e) {
-    return a + b + c + d + e;
-  }
-};
-
-string Concat5(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
-               const char* s4, const char* s5) {
-  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5;
-}
-
-int SumOf6(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
-  return a + b + c + d + e + f;
-}
-
-struct SumOf6Functor {
-  int operator()(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e, int f) {
-    return a + b + c + d + e + f;
-  }
-};
-
-string Concat6(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
-               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6) {
-  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6;
-}
-
-string Concat7(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
-               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
-               const char* s7) {
-  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7;
-}
-
-string Concat8(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
-               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
-               const char* s7, const char* s8) {
-  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8;
-}
-
-string Concat9(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
-               const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
-               const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9) {
-  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9;
-}
-
-string Concat10(const char* s1, const char* s2, const char* s3,
-                const char* s4, const char* s5, const char* s6,
-                const char* s7, const char* s8, const char* s9,
-                const char* s10) {
-  return string(s1) + s2 + s3 + s4 + s5 + s6 + s7 + s8 + s9 + s10;
-}
-
-// A helper that turns the type of a C-string literal from const
-// char[N] to const char*.
-inline const char* CharPtr(const char* s) { return s; }
-
-// Tests InvokeArgument<N>(...).
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a nullary function.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function0) {
-  Action<int(int, int(*)())> a = InvokeArgument<1>();  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(2, &Nullary)));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a unary function.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor1) {
-  Action<int(UnaryFunctor)> a = InvokeArgument<0>(true);  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(make_tuple(UnaryFunctor())));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary function.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function5) {
-  Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int))> a =  // NOLINT
-      InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5);
-  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(&SumOf5)));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 5-ary functor.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor5) {
-  Action<int(SumOf5Functor)> a =  // NOLINT
-      InvokeArgument<0>(10000, 2000, 300, 40, 5);
-  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a.Perform(make_tuple(SumOf5Functor())));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary function.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function6) {
-  Action<int(int(*)(int, int, int, int, int, int))> a =  // NOLINT
-      InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6);
-  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(&SumOf6)));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 6-ary functor.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Functor6) {
-  Action<int(SumOf6Functor)> a =  // NOLINT
-      InvokeArgument<0>(100000, 20000, 3000, 400, 50, 6);
-  EXPECT_EQ(123456, a.Perform(make_tuple(SumOf6Functor())));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 7-ary function.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function7) {
-  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
-                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
-                          const char*))> a =
-      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7");
-  EXPECT_EQ("1234567", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat7)));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 8-ary function.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function8) {
-  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
-                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
-                          const char*, const char*))> a =
-      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8");
-  EXPECT_EQ("12345678", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat8)));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 9-ary function.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function9) {
-  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
-                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
-                          const char*, const char*, const char*))> a =
-      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9");
-  EXPECT_EQ("123456789", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat9)));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a 10-ary function.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, Function10) {
-  Action<string(string(*)(const char*, const char*, const char*,
-                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
-                          const char*, const char*, const char*,
-                          const char*))> a =
-      InvokeArgument<0>("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "0");
-  EXPECT_EQ("1234567890", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Concat10)));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a pointer argument.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByPointerFunction) {
-  Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a =  // NOLINT
-      InvokeArgument<0>(static_cast<const char*>("Hi"), Short(1));
-  EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Binary)));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const char*
-// by passing it a C-string literal.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, FunctionWithCStringLiteral) {
-  Action<const char*(const char*(*)(const char* input, short n))> a =  // NOLINT
-      InvokeArgument<0>("Hi", Short(1));
-  EXPECT_STREQ("i", a.Perform(make_tuple(&Binary)));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with a function that takes a const reference.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByConstReferenceFunction) {
-  Action<bool(bool(*function)(const string& s))> a =  // NOLINT
-      InvokeArgument<0>(string("Hi"));
-  // When action 'a' is constructed, it makes a copy of the temporary
-  // string object passed to it, so it's OK to use 'a' later, when the
-  // temporary object has already died.
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ByConstRef)));
-}
-
-// Tests using InvokeArgument with ByRef() and a function that takes a
-// const reference.
-TEST(InvokeArgumentTest, ByExplicitConstReferenceFunction) {
-  Action<bool(bool(*)(const double& x))> a =  // NOLINT
-      InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(g_double));
-  // The above line calls ByRef() on a const value.
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble)));
-
-  double x = 0;
-  a = InvokeArgument<0>(ByRef(x));  // This calls ByRef() on a non-const.
-  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(&ReferencesGlobalDouble)));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs and with an action that takes 1 argument.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, OneArg) {
-  Action<bool(double x, int n)> a = WithArgs<1>(Invoke(Unary));  // NOLINT
-  EXPECT_TRUE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, -1)));
-  EXPECT_FALSE(a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 1)));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 2 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, TwoArgs) {
-  Action<const char*(const char* s, double x, short n)> a =
-      WithArgs<0, 2>(Invoke(Binary));
-  const char s[] = "Hello";
-  EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr(s), 0.5, Short(2))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 3 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, ThreeArgs) {
-  Action<int(int, double, char, short)> a =  // NOLINT
-      WithArgs<0, 2, 3>(Invoke(Ternary));
-  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, 6.5, Char(20), Short(3))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 4 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, FourArgs) {
-  Action<string(const char*, const char*, double, const char*, const char*)> a =
-      WithArgs<4, 3, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat4));
-  EXPECT_EQ("4310", a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), 2.5,
-                                         CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 5 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, FiveArgs) {
-  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*,
-                const char*, const char*)> a =
-      WithArgs<4, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat5));
-  EXPECT_EQ("43210",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
-                                 CharPtr("3"), CharPtr("4"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 6 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, SixArgs) {
-  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat6));
-  EXPECT_EQ("012210",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 7 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, SevenArgs) {
-  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0>(Invoke(Concat7));
-  EXPECT_EQ("0123210",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
-                                 CharPtr("3"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 8 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, EightArgs) {
-  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat8));
-  EXPECT_EQ("01230123",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
-                                 CharPtr("3"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 9 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, NineArgs) {
-  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat9));
-  EXPECT_EQ("012312323",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
-                                 CharPtr("3"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that takes 10 arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, TenArgs) {
-  Action<string(const char*, const char*, const char*, const char*)> a =
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3>(Invoke(Concat10));
-  EXPECT_EQ("0123210123",
-            a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("0"), CharPtr("1"), CharPtr("2"),
-                                 CharPtr("3"))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that is not Invoke().
-class SubstractAction : public ActionInterface<int(int, int)> {  // NOLINT
- public:
-  virtual int Perform(const tuple<int, int>& args) {
-    return get<0>(args) - get<1>(args);
-  }
-};
-
-TEST(WithArgsTest, NonInvokeAction) {
-  Action<int(const string&, int, int)> a =  // NOLINT
-      WithArgs<2, 1>(MakeAction(new SubstractAction));
-  EXPECT_EQ(8, a.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("hi"), 2, 10)));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs to pass all original arguments in the original order.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, Identity) {
-  Action<int(int x, char y, short z)> a =  // NOLINT
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 2>(Invoke(Ternary));
-  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(100, Char(20), Short(3))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with repeated arguments.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, RepeatedArguments) {
-  Action<int(bool, int m, int n)> a =  // NOLINT
-      WithArgs<1, 1, 1, 1>(Invoke(SumOf4));
-  EXPECT_EQ(4, a.Perform(make_tuple(false, 1, 10)));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with reversed argument order.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, ReversedArgumentOrder) {
-  Action<const char*(short n, const char* input)> a =  // NOLINT
-      WithArgs<1, 0>(Invoke(Binary));
-  const char s[] = "Hello";
-  EXPECT_EQ(s + 2, a.Perform(make_tuple(Short(2), CharPtr(s))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with compatible, but not identical, argument types.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, ArgsOfCompatibleTypes) {
-  Action<long(short x, char y, double z, char c)> a =  // NOLINT
-      WithArgs<0, 1, 3>(Invoke(Ternary));
-  EXPECT_EQ(123, a.Perform(make_tuple(Short(100), Char(20), 5.6, Char(3))));
-}
-
-// Tests using WithArgs with an action that returns void.
-TEST(WithArgsTest, VoidAction) {
-  Action<void(double x, char c, int n)> a = WithArgs<2, 1>(Invoke(VoidBinary));
-  g_done = false;
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(1.5, 'a', 3));
-  EXPECT_TRUE(g_done);
-}
-
-// Tests DoAll(a1, a2).
-TEST(DoAllTest, TwoActions) {
-  int n = 0;
-  Action<int(int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),  // NOLINT
-                              Return(2));
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, a.Perform(make_tuple(&n)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
-}
-
-// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3).
-TEST(DoAllTest, ThreeActions) {
-  int m = 0, n = 0;
-  Action<int(int*, int*)> a = DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),  // NOLINT
-                                    SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
-                                    Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
-}
-
-// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4).
-TEST(DoAllTest, FourActions) {
-  int m = 0, n = 0;
-  char ch = '\0';
-  Action<int(int*, int*, char*)> a =  // NOLINT
-      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
-            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
-            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
-            Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &ch)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
-  EXPECT_EQ('a', ch);
-}
-
-// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5).
-TEST(DoAllTest, FiveActions) {
-  int m = 0, n = 0;
-  char a = '\0', b = '\0';
-  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*)> action =  // NOLINT
-      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
-            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
-            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
-            Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
-  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
-  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
-}
-
-// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a6).
-TEST(DoAllTest, SixActions) {
-  int m = 0, n = 0;
-  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0';
-  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*)> action =  // NOLINT
-      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
-            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
-            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
-            Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
-  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
-  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
-  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
-}
-
-// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a7).
-TEST(DoAllTest, SevenActions) {
-  int m = 0, n = 0;
-  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0';
-  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*)> action =  // NOLINT
-      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
-            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
-            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<5>('d'),
-            Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
-  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
-  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
-  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
-  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
-}
-
-// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a8).
-TEST(DoAllTest, EightActions) {
-  int m = 0, n = 0;
-  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0';
-  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*,  // NOLINT
-             char*)> action =
-      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
-            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
-            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<5>('d'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<6>('e'),
-            Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
-  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
-  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
-  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
-  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
-  EXPECT_EQ('e', e);
-}
-
-// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a9).
-TEST(DoAllTest, NineActions) {
-  int m = 0, n = 0;
-  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0', e = '\0', f = '\0';
-  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*,  // NOLINT
-             char*, char*)> action =
-      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
-            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
-            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<5>('d'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<6>('e'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<7>('f'),
-            Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
-  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
-  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
-  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
-  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
-  EXPECT_EQ('e', e);
-  EXPECT_EQ('f', f);
-}
-
-// Tests DoAll(a1, a2, ..., a10).
-TEST(DoAllTest, TenActions) {
-  int m = 0, n = 0;
-  char a = '\0', b = '\0', c = '\0', d = '\0';
-  char e = '\0', f = '\0', g = '\0';
-  Action<int(int*, int*, char*, char*, char*, char*,  // NOLINT
-             char*, char*, char*)> action =
-      DoAll(SetArgumentPointee<0>(1),
-            SetArgumentPointee<1>(2),
-            SetArgumentPointee<2>('a'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<3>('b'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<4>('c'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<5>('d'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<6>('e'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<7>('f'),
-            SetArgumentPointee<8>('g'),
-            Return(3));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, action.Perform(make_tuple(&m, &n, &a, &b, &c, &d, &e, &f, &g)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, m);
-  EXPECT_EQ(2, n);
-  EXPECT_EQ('a', a);
-  EXPECT_EQ('b', b);
-  EXPECT_EQ('c', c);
-  EXPECT_EQ('d', d);
-  EXPECT_EQ('e', e);
-  EXPECT_EQ('f', f);
-  EXPECT_EQ('g', g);
-}
-
-// The ACTION*() macros trigger warning C4100 (unreferenced formal
-// parameter) in MSVC with -W4.  Unfortunately they cannot be fixed in
-// the macro definition, as the warnings are generated when the macro
-// is expanded and macro expansion cannot contain #pragma.  Therefore
-// we suppress them here.
-#ifdef _MSC_VER
-#pragma warning(push)
-#pragma warning(disable:4100)
-#endif
-
-// Tests the ACTION*() macro family.
-
-// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that doesn't reference the
-// mock function arguments.
-ACTION(Return5) { return 5; }
-
-TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenNotReferencingArguments) {
-  Action<double()> a1 = Return5();
-  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(5, a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
-
-  Action<int(double, bool)> a2 = Return5();
-  EXPECT_EQ(5, a2.Perform(make_tuple(1, true)));
-}
-
-// Tests that ACTION() can define an action that returns void.
-ACTION(IncrementArg1) { (*arg1)++; }
-
-TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksWhenReturningVoid) {
-  Action<void(int, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg1();
-  int n = 0;
-  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, &n));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
-}
-
-// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the type of the
-// argument.
-ACTION(IncrementArg2) {
-  StaticAssertTypeEq<int*, arg2_type>();
-  arg2_type temp = arg2;
-  (*temp)++;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentType) {
-  Action<void(int, bool, int*)> a1 = IncrementArg2();
-  int n = 0;
-  a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, false, &n));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
-}
-
-// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the argument tuple
-// via args_type and args.
-ACTION(Sum2) {
-  StaticAssertTypeEq< ::std::tr1::tuple<int, char, int*>, args_type>();
-  args_type args_copy = args;
-  return get<0>(args_copy) + get<1>(args_copy);
-}
-
-TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentTuple) {
-  Action<int(int, char, int*)> a1 = Sum2();
-  int dummy = 0;
-  EXPECT_EQ(11, a1.Perform(make_tuple(5, Char(6), &dummy)));
-}
-
-// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function
-// type.
-int Dummy(bool flag) { return flag? 1 : 0; }
-
-ACTION(InvokeDummy) {
-  StaticAssertTypeEq<int(bool), function_type>();
-  function_type* fp = &Dummy;
-  return (*fp)(true);
-}
-
-TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionType) {
-  Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy();
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false)));
-}
-
-// Tests that the body of ACTION() can reference the mock function's
-// return type.
-ACTION(InvokeDummy2) {
-  StaticAssertTypeEq<int, return_type>();
-  return_type result = Dummy(true);
-  return result;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanReferenceMockFunctionReturnType) {
-  Action<int(bool)> a1 = InvokeDummy2();
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(true)));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple(false)));
-}
-
-// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by const reference.
-ACTION(ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg) {
-  StaticAssertTypeEq<const bool&, arg1_type>();
-  return &arg1;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForConstReferenceArg) {
-  Action<const bool*(int, const bool&)> a = ReturnAddrOfConstBoolReferenceArg();
-  const bool b = false;
-  EXPECT_EQ(&b, a.Perform(tuple<int, const bool&>(0, b)));
-}
-
-// Tests that ACTION() works for arguments passed by non-const reference.
-ACTION(ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg) {
-  StaticAssertTypeEq<int&, arg0_type>();
-  return &arg0;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForNonConstReferenceArg) {
-  Action<int*(int&, bool, int)> a = ReturnAddrOfIntReferenceArg();
-  int n = 0;
-  EXPECT_EQ(&n, a.Perform(tuple<int&, bool, int>(n, true, 1)));
-}
-
-// Tests that ACTION() can be used in a namespace.
-namespace action_test {
-ACTION(Sum) { return arg0 + arg1; }
-}  // namespace action_test
-
-TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksInNamespace) {
-  Action<int(int, int)> a1 = action_test::Sum();
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, a1.Perform(make_tuple(1, 2)));
-}
-
-// Tests that the same ACTION definition works for mock functions with
-// different argument numbers.
-ACTION(PlusTwo) { return arg0 + 2; }
-
-TEST(ActionMacroTest, WorksForDifferentArgumentNumbers) {
-  Action<int(int)> a1 = PlusTwo();
-  EXPECT_EQ(4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(2)));
-
-  Action<double(float, void*)> a2 = PlusTwo();
-  int dummy;
-  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(6, a2.Perform(make_tuple(4.0f, &dummy)));
-}
-
-// Tests that ACTION_P can define a parameterized action.
-ACTION_P(Plus, n) { return arg0 + n; }
-
-TEST(ActionPMacroTest, DefinesParameterizedAction) {
-  Action<int(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(9);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(make_tuple(1, true)));
-}
-
-// Tests that the body of ACTION_P can reference the argument types
-// and the parameter type.
-ACTION_P(TypedPlus, n) {
-  arg0_type t1 = arg0;
-  n_type t2 = n;
-  return t1 + t2;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionPMacroTest, CanReferenceArgumentAndParameterTypes) {
-  Action<int(char m, bool t)> a1 = TypedPlus(9);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10, a1.Perform(make_tuple(Char(1), true)));
-}
-
-// Tests that a parameterized action can be used in any mock function
-// whose type is compatible.
-TEST(ActionPMacroTest, WorksInCompatibleMockFunction) {
-  Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a1 = Plus("tail");
-  const std::string re = "re";
-  EXPECT_EQ("retail", a1.Perform(make_tuple(re)));
-}
-
-// Tests that we can use ACTION*() to define actions overloaded on the
-// number of parameters.
-
-ACTION(OverloadedAction) { return arg0 ? arg1 : "hello"; }
-
-ACTION_P(OverloadedAction, default_value) {
-  return arg0 ? arg1 : default_value;
-}
-
-ACTION_P2(OverloadedAction, true_value, false_value) {
-  return arg0 ? true_value : false_value;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionMacroTest, CanDefineOverloadedActions) {
-  typedef Action<const char*(bool, const char*)> MyAction;
-
-  const MyAction a1 = OverloadedAction();
-  EXPECT_STREQ("hello", a1.Perform(make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world"))));
-  EXPECT_STREQ("world", a1.Perform(make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world"))));
-
-  const MyAction a2 = OverloadedAction("hi");
-  EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a2.Perform(make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world"))));
-  EXPECT_STREQ("world", a2.Perform(make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world"))));
-
-  const MyAction a3 = OverloadedAction("hi", "you");
-  EXPECT_STREQ("hi", a3.Perform(make_tuple(true, CharPtr("world"))));
-  EXPECT_STREQ("you", a3.Perform(make_tuple(false, CharPtr("world"))));
-}
-
-// Tests ACTION_Pn where n >= 3.
-
-ACTION_P3(Plus, m, n, k) { return arg0 + m + n + k; }
-
-TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor3Parameters) {
-  Action<double(int m, bool t)> a1 = Plus(100, 20, 3.4);
-  EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(3123.4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(3000, true)));
-
-  Action<std::string(const std::string& s)> a2 = Plus("tail", "-", ">");
-  const std::string re = "re";
-  EXPECT_EQ("retail->", a2.Perform(make_tuple(re)));
-}
-
-ACTION_P4(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3; }
-
-TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor4Parameters) {
-  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
-}
-
-ACTION_P5(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4) { return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4; }
-
-TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor5Parameters) {
-  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
-}
-
-ACTION_P6(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5) {
-  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor6Parameters) {
-  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
-}
-
-ACTION_P7(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6) {
-  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor7Parameters) {
-  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
-}
-
-ACTION_P8(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7) {
-  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor8Parameters) {
-  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
-}
-
-ACTION_P9(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8) {
-  return arg0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor9Parameters) {
-  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9, a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
-}
-
-ACTION_P10(Plus, p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, last_param) {
-  arg0_type t0 = arg0;
-  last_param_type t9 = last_param;
-  return t0 + p0 + p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p6 + p7 + p8 + t9;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, WorksFor10Parameters) {
-  Action<int(int)> a1 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);
-  EXPECT_EQ(10 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10,
-            a1.Perform(make_tuple(10)));
-}
-
-// Tests that the action body can promote the parameter types.
-
-ACTION_P2(PadArgument, prefix, suffix) {
-  // The following lines promote the two parameters to desired types.
-  std::string prefix_str(prefix);
-  char suffix_char = static_cast<char>(suffix);
-  return prefix_str + arg0 + suffix_char;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, SimpleTypePromotion) {
-  Action<std::string(const char*)> no_promo =
-      PadArgument(std::string("foo"), 'r');
-  Action<std::string(const char*)> promo =
-      PadArgument("foo", static_cast<int>('r'));
-  EXPECT_EQ("foobar", no_promo.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("ba"))));
-  EXPECT_EQ("foobar", promo.Perform(make_tuple(CharPtr("ba"))));
-}
-
-// Tests that we can partially restrict parameter types using a
-// straight-forward pattern.
-
-// Defines a generic action that doesn't restrict the types of its
-// parameters.
-ACTION_P3(ConcatImpl, a, b, c) {
-  std::stringstream ss;
-  ss << a << b << c;
-  return ss.str();
-}
-
-// Next, we try to restrict that either the first parameter is a
-// string, or the second parameter is an int.
-
-// Defines a partially specialized wrapper that restricts the first
-// parameter to std::string.
-template <typename T1, typename T2>
-// ConcatImplActionP3 is the class template ACTION_P3 uses to
-// implement ConcatImpl.  We shouldn't change the name as this
-// pattern requires the user to use it directly.
-ConcatImplActionP3<std::string, T1, T2>
-Concat(const std::string& a, T1 b, T2 c) {
-  if (true) {
-    // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can be invoked without
-    // explicit template arguments.
-    return ConcatImpl(a, b, c);
-  } else {
-    // This branch verifies that ConcatImpl() can also be invoked with
-    // explicit template arguments.  It doesn't really need to be
-    // executed as this is a compile-time verification.
-    return ConcatImpl<std::string, T1, T2>(a, b, c);
-  }
-}
-
-// Defines another partially specialized wrapper that restricts the
-// second parameter to int.
-template <typename T1, typename T2>
-ConcatImplActionP3<T1, int, T2>
-Concat(T1 a, int b, T2 c) {
-  return ConcatImpl(a, b, c);
-}
-
-TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanPartiallyRestrictParameterTypes) {
-  Action<const std::string()> a1 = Concat("Hello", "1", 2);
-  EXPECT_EQ("Hello12", a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
-
-  a1 = Concat(1, 2, 3);
-  EXPECT_EQ("123", a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
-}
-
-// Verifies the type of an ACTION*.
-
-ACTION(DoFoo) {}
-ACTION_P(DoFoo, p) {}
-ACTION_P2(DoFoo, p0, p1) {}
-
-TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, TypesAreCorrect) {
-  // DoFoo() must be assignable to a DoFooAction variable.
-  DoFooAction a0 = DoFoo();
-
-  // DoFoo(1) must be assignable to a DoFooActionP variable.
-  DoFooActionP<int> a1 = DoFoo(1);
-
-  // DoFoo(p1, ..., pk) must be assignable to a DoFooActionPk
-  // variable, and so on.
-  DoFooActionP2<int, char> a2 = DoFoo(1, '2');
-  PlusActionP3<int, int, char> a3 = Plus(1, 2, '3');
-  PlusActionP4<int, int, int, char> a4 = Plus(1, 2, 3, '4');
-  PlusActionP5<int, int, int, int, char> a5 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, '5');
-  PlusActionP6<int, int, int, int, int, char> a6 = Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, '6');
-  PlusActionP7<int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a7 =
-      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, '7');
-  PlusActionP8<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a8 =
-      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, '8');
-  PlusActionP9<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a9 =
-      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, '9');
-  PlusActionP10<int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, char> a10 =
-      Plus(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, '0');
-}
-
-// Tests that an ACTION_P*() action can be explicitly instantiated
-// with reference-typed parameters.
-
-ACTION_P(Plus1, x) { return x; }
-ACTION_P2(Plus2, x, y) { return x + y; }
-ACTION_P3(Plus3, x, y, z) { return x + y + z; }
-ACTION_P10(Plus10, a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9) {
-  return a0 + a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionPnMacroTest, CanExplicitlyInstantiateWithReferenceTypes) {
-  int x = 1, y = 2, z = 3;
-  const tuple<> empty = make_tuple();
-
-  Action<int()> a = Plus1<int&>(x);
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a.Perform(empty));
-
-  a = Plus2<const int&, int&>(x, y);
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, a.Perform(empty));
-
-  a = Plus3<int&, const int&, int&>(x, y, z);
-  EXPECT_EQ(6, a.Perform(empty));
-
-  int n[10] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 };
-  a = Plus10<const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&, int&, const int&,
-      int&, const int&, int&>(n[0], n[1], n[2], n[3], n[4], n[5], n[6], n[7],
-                              n[8], n[9]);
-  EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(empty));
-}
-
-class NullaryConstructorClass {
- public:
-  NullaryConstructorClass() : value_(123) {}
-  int value_;
-};
-
-// Tests using ReturnNew() with a nullary constructor.
-TEST(ReturnNewTest, NoArgs) {
-  Action<NullaryConstructorClass*()> a = ReturnNew<NullaryConstructorClass>();
-  NullaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
-  EXPECT_EQ(123, c->value_);
-  delete c;
-}
-
-class UnaryConstructorClass {
- public:
-  explicit UnaryConstructorClass(int value) : value_(value) {}
-  int value_;
-};
-
-// Tests using ReturnNew() with a unary constructor.
-TEST(ReturnNewTest, Unary) {
-  Action<UnaryConstructorClass*()> a = ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
-  UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
-  EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
-  delete c;
-}
-
-TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodHasArgs) {
-  Action<UnaryConstructorClass*(bool, int)> a =
-      ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
-  UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple(false, 5));
-  EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
-  delete c;
-}
-
-TEST(ReturnNewTest, UnaryWorksWhenMockMethodReturnsPointerToConst) {
-  Action<const UnaryConstructorClass*()> a =
-      ReturnNew<UnaryConstructorClass>(4000);
-  const UnaryConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
-  EXPECT_EQ(4000, c->value_);
-  delete c;
-}
-
-class TenArgConstructorClass {
- public:
-  TenArgConstructorClass(int a1, int a2, int a3, int a4, int a5,
-                         int a6, int a7, int a8, int a9, int a10)
-    : value_(a1 + a2 + a3 + a4 + a5 + a6 + a7 + a8 + a9 + a10) {
-  }
-  int value_;
-};
-
-// Tests using ReturnNew() with a 10-argument constructor.
-TEST(ReturnNewTest, ConstructorThatTakes10Arguments) {
-  Action<TenArgConstructorClass*()> a =
-      ReturnNew<TenArgConstructorClass>(1000000000, 200000000, 30000000,
-                                        4000000, 500000, 60000,
-                                        7000, 800, 90, 0);
-  TenArgConstructorClass* c = a.Perform(make_tuple());
-  EXPECT_EQ(1234567890, c->value_);
-  delete c;
-}
-
-// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there is no value parameter.
-ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew,
-                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T),
-                AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) {
-  return new T;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithoutValueParam) {
-  const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>();
-  int* p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
-  delete p;
-}
-
-// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works when there are value parameters.
-ACTION_TEMPLATE(CreateNew,
-                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, T),
-                AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(a0)) {
-  return new T(a0);
-}
-
-TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksWithValueParams) {
-  const Action<int*()> a = CreateNew<int>(42);
-  int* p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
-  EXPECT_EQ(42, *p);
-  delete p;
-}
-
-// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for integral template parameters.
-ACTION_TEMPLATE(MyDeleteArg,
-                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(int, k),
-                AND_0_VALUE_PARAMS()) {
-  delete std::tr1::get<k>(args);
-}
-
-// Resets a bool variable in the destructor.
-class BoolResetter {
- public:
-  explicit BoolResetter(bool* value) : value_(value) {}
-  ~BoolResetter() { *value_ = false; }
- private:
-  bool* value_;
-};
-
-TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForIntegralTemplateParams) {
-  const Action<void(int*, BoolResetter*)> a = MyDeleteArg<1>();
-  int n = 0;
-  bool b = true;
-  BoolResetter* resetter = new BoolResetter(&b);
-  a.Perform(make_tuple(&n, resetter));
-  EXPECT_FALSE(b);  // Verifies that resetter is deleted.
-}
-
-// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATES works for template template parameters.
-ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSmartPointer,
-                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(template <typename Pointee> class,
-                                      Pointer),
-                AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(pointee)) {
-  return Pointer<pointee_type>(new pointee_type(pointee));
-}
-
-TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksForTemplateTemplateParameters) {
-  using ::testing::internal::linked_ptr;
-  const Action<linked_ptr<int>()> a = ReturnSmartPointer<linked_ptr>(42);
-  linked_ptr<int> p = a.Perform(make_tuple());
-  EXPECT_EQ(42, *p);
-}
-
-// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 template parameters.
-template <typename T1, typename T2, typename T3, int k4, bool k5,
-          unsigned int k6, typename T7, typename T8, typename T9>
-struct GiantTemplate {
- public:
-  explicit GiantTemplate(int a_value) : value(a_value) {}
-  int value;
-};
-
-ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnGiant,
-                HAS_10_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(
-                    typename, T1,
-                    typename, T2,
-                    typename, T3,
-                    int, k4,
-                    bool, k5,
-                    unsigned int, k6,
-                    class, T7,
-                    class, T8,
-                    class, T9,
-                    template <typename T> class, T10),
-                AND_1_VALUE_PARAMS(value)) {
-  return GiantTemplate<T10<T1>, T2, T3, k4, k5, k6, T7, T8, T9>(value);
-}
-
-TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10TemplateParameters) {
-  using ::testing::internal::linked_ptr;
-  typedef GiantTemplate<linked_ptr<int>, bool, double, 5,
-      true, 6, char, unsigned, int> Giant;
-  const Action<Giant()> a = ReturnGiant<
-      int, bool, double, 5, true, 6, char, unsigned, int, linked_ptr>(42);
-  Giant giant = a.Perform(make_tuple());
-  EXPECT_EQ(42, giant.value);
-}
-
-// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE works for 10 value parameters.
-ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
-                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number),
-                AND_10_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, v9, v10)) {
-  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + v5 + v6 + v7 + v8 + v9 + v10;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionTemplateTest, WorksFor10ValueParameters) {
-  const Action<int()> a = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);
-  EXPECT_EQ(55, a.Perform(make_tuple()));
-}
-
-// Tests that ACTION_TEMPLATE and ACTION/ACTION_P* can be overloaded
-// on the number of value parameters.
-
-ACTION(ReturnSum) { return 0; }
-
-ACTION_P(ReturnSum, x) { return x; }
-
-ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
-                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number),
-                AND_2_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2)) {
-  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2;
-}
-
-ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
-                HAS_1_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number),
-                AND_3_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3)) {
-  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3;
-}
-
-ACTION_TEMPLATE(ReturnSum,
-                HAS_2_TEMPLATE_PARAMS(typename, Number, int, k),
-                AND_4_VALUE_PARAMS(v1, v2, v3, v4)) {
-  return static_cast<Number>(v1) + v2 + v3 + v4 + k;
-}
-
-TEST(ActionTemplateTest, CanBeOverloadedOnNumberOfValueParameters) {
-  const Action<int()> a0 = ReturnSum();
-  const Action<int()> a1 = ReturnSum(1);
-  const Action<int()> a2 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2);
-  const Action<int()> a3 = ReturnSum<int>(1, 2, 3);
-  const Action<int()> a4 = ReturnSum<int, 10000>(2000, 300, 40, 5);
-  EXPECT_EQ(0, a0.Perform(make_tuple()));
-  EXPECT_EQ(1, a1.Perform(make_tuple()));
-  EXPECT_EQ(3, a2.Perform(make_tuple()));
-  EXPECT_EQ(6, a3.Perform(make_tuple()));
-  EXPECT_EQ(12345, a4.Perform(make_tuple()));
-}
-
-#ifdef _MSC_VER
-#pragma warning(pop)
-#endif
-
-}  // namespace gmock_generated_actions_test
-}  // namespace testing