Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(73)

Issue 618643003: Implement data property creation for assignments to super.x. (Closed)

Created:
6 years, 2 months ago by Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
Modified:
5 years, 10 months ago
CC:
v8-dev
Project:
v8
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Implement data property creation for assignments to super.x. R=rossberg@chromium.org, arv@chromium.org BUG=v8:3330 LOG=N Committed: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=24331

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 5
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+214 lines, -11 lines) Patch
M src/objects.cc View 1 chunk +5 lines, -7 lines 1 comment Download
M test/mjsunit/harmony/super.js View 4 chunks +209 lines, -4 lines 4 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 12 (2 generated)
Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
PTAL
6 years, 2 months ago (2014-09-30 12:23:26 UTC) #2
rossberg
lgtm
6 years, 2 months ago (2014-09-30 12:57:40 UTC) #3
Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
Committed patchset #1 (id:1) manually as 24331 (presubmit successful).
6 years, 2 months ago (2014-09-30 13:23:25 UTC) #4
arv (Not doing code reviews)
https://codereview.chromium.org/618643003/diff/1/test/mjsunit/harmony/super.js File test/mjsunit/harmony/super.js (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/618643003/diff/1/test/mjsunit/harmony/super.js#newcode126 test/mjsunit/harmony/super.js:126: x : "x from Base" stick to ' https://codereview.chromium.org/618643003/diff/1/test/mjsunit/harmony/super.js#newcode126 ...
6 years, 2 months ago (2014-09-30 13:52:17 UTC) #5
arv (Not doing code reviews)
LGTM
6 years, 2 months ago (2014-09-30 13:57:06 UTC) #6
Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
On 2014/09/30 13:52:17, arv wrote: > https://codereview.chromium.org/618643003/diff/1/test/mjsunit/harmony/super.js > File test/mjsunit/harmony/super.js (right): > > https://codereview.chromium.org/618643003/diff/1/test/mjsunit/harmony/super.js#newcode126 > ...
6 years, 2 months ago (2014-09-30 15:22:42 UTC) #7
Toon Verwaest
https://codereview.chromium.org/618643003/diff/1/src/objects.cc File src/objects.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/618643003/diff/1/src/objects.cc#newcode2912 src/objects.cc:2912: return JSObject::SetProperty(&own_lookup, value, strict_mode, store_mode, This is not correct ...
5 years, 10 months ago (2015-02-16 09:33:11 UTC) #9
Dmitry Lomov (no reviews)
On 2015/02/16 09:33:11, Toon Verwaest wrote: > https://codereview.chromium.org/618643003/diff/1/src/objects.cc > File src/objects.cc (right): > > https://codereview.chromium.org/618643003/diff/1/src/objects.cc#newcode2912 ...
5 years, 10 months ago (2015-02-17 11:29:32 UTC) #10
Toon Verwaest
You aren't guaranteed that the receiver hasn't got OWN properties, since the receiver was never ...
5 years, 10 months ago (2015-02-17 14:07:04 UTC) #11
Toon Verwaest
5 years, 10 months ago (2015-02-17 14:07:55 UTC) #12
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Mostly, SetProperty should not know anything about SUPER, Given that SetProperty
in the spec doesn't know anything about it either. It just forces our
SetProperty to get closer to how the spec works.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698