Roll ANGLE.

Roll ANGLE.

https://chromium.googlesource.com/angle/angle/+log/57f20894aee71ca9f78803f5a7545a86fd880ddb..b4fd0c96d21ff1534e1d6db40dcf142eeebda0d0?pretty=full

BUG=
TEST=bots
R=kbr@chromium.org

Committed: https://crrev.com/d3df522f96601e395f54142af9dec3ebfa947e96
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#297760}

[Zhenyao Mo, 2014-10-01 20:21:11]

Please take a look.

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2014-10-01 20:24:43]

LGTM assuming it passes the bots.

[Jamie Madill, 2014-10-01 20:29:57]

On 2014/10/01 20:24:43, Ken Russell wrote:
> LGTM assuming it passes the bots.

This roll will conflict with https://codereview.chromium.org/618673003/

might be worth checking with ANGLE folks on roll coordination.

[Zhenyao Mo, 2014-10-01 20:46:42]

On 2014/10/01 20:29:57, Jamie Madill wrote:
> On 2014/10/01 20:24:43, Ken Russell wrote:
> > LGTM assuming it passes the bots.
> 
> This roll will conflict with https://codereview.chromium.org/618673003/
> 
> might be worth checking with ANGLE folks on roll coordination.

Thanks.  Please take a look at the failures in the try jobs.

[Jamie Madill, 2014-10-01 21:06:22]

On 2014/10/01 20:46:42, Zhenyao Mo wrote:
> On 2014/10/01 20:29:57, Jamie Madill wrote:
> > On 2014/10/01 20:24:43, Ken Russell wrote:
> > > LGTM assuming it passes the bots.
> > 
> > This roll will conflict with https://codereview.chromium.org/618673003/
> > 
> > might be worth checking with ANGLE folks on roll coordination.
> 
> Thanks.  Please take a look at the failures in the try jobs.

Sorry, I spoke too soon. I think the failures are unrelated to the previous roll
and are new regressions -- thanks for letting me know about it, will take a
look.

[Zhenyao Mo, 2014-10-01 21:44:16]

On 2014/10/01 21:06:22, Jamie Madill wrote:
> On 2014/10/01 20:46:42, Zhenyao Mo wrote:
> > On 2014/10/01 20:29:57, Jamie Madill wrote:
> > > On 2014/10/01 20:24:43, Ken Russell wrote:
> > > > LGTM assuming it passes the bots.
> > > 
> > > This roll will conflict with https://codereview.chromium.org/618673003/
> > > 
> > > might be worth checking with ANGLE folks on roll coordination.
> > 
> > Thanks.  Please take a look at the failures in the try jobs.
> 
> Sorry, I spoke too soon. I think the failures are unrelated to the previous
roll
> and are new regressions -- thanks for letting me know about it, will take a
> look.

No apology necessary.  I will try to better coordinate with ANGLE folks about
rolling.

The reason I tried to do a roll is I am working on the new Get*Info API, and
there might be some modifications I want to push to ANGLE to finish the task -
just want to be able to roll it in when I need to.

[Zhenyao Mo, 2014-10-01 23:52:04]

The CQ bit was checked by zmo@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-10-01 23:53:10]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/618243003/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-10-02 01:44:47]

Committed patchset #2 (id:20001) as c277a213bedc19e60401dc1e0d410009800629c6

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-10-02 01:45:20]

Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/d3df522f96601e395f54142af9dec3ebfa947e96
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#297760}