use base::Time constants in mojo instead of defining locally

mojo/apps/js/bindings/monotonic_clock.cc

Index: mojo/apps/js/bindings/monotonic_clock.cc
diff --git a/mojo/apps/js/bindings/monotonic_clock.cc b/mojo/apps/js/bindings/monotonic_clock.cc
index 733af8a69e2263601124db105a0e6ae0c30c4d01..9470a61833e8d451c2e48d2684641cc4aa11bfca 100644
--- a/mojo/apps/js/bindings/monotonic_clock.cc
+++ b/mojo/apps/js/bindings/monotonic_clock.cc
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 
 #include "mojo/apps/js/bindings/monotonic_clock.h"
 
+#include "base/time/time.h"
 #include "gin/object_template_builder.h"
 #include "gin/per_isolate_data.h"
 #include "gin/public/wrapper_info.h"
@@ -17,8 +18,7 @@ namespace {
 gin::WrapperInfo g_wrapper_info = { gin::kEmbedderNativeGin };
 
 double GetMonotonicSeconds() {
-  const double kMicrosecondsPerSecond = 1000000;
-  return static_cast<double>(mojo::GetTimeTicksNow()) / kMicrosecondsPerSecond;
+  return static_cast<double>(mojo::GetTimeTicksNow()) / base::Time::kMicrosecondsPerSecond;

[darin (slow to review), 2014/10/09 17:12:50]

nit: need to reformat for 80 character line limit

[prashant.hiremath, 2014/10/09 17:44:40]

I,m confused between moving second part i.e base::Time::kMicrosecondsPerSecond
to next line or using namespace base::Time; and keeping 2nd part as previous.
Which one would you think better? 

 }
 
 }  // namespace