Add pepper OWNERS to chrome/common/pepper_*

Add pepper OWNERS to chrome/common/pepper_*

BUG=None

Committed: https://crrev.com/6393bc127b79cc3445014cf8ffb46cde14e43316
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#295724}

[elijahtaylor1, 2014-09-17 21:01:34]

elijahtaylor@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ sky@chromium.org

[elijahtaylor1, 2014-09-17 21:03:10]

Hi folks (added new potential OWNERS to CC),

chrome/OWNERS has been catching these files, and it was brought up in
https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/17029002 that this is not really ideal.

Everyone I added here was in ppapi/OWNERS.  Let me know if there are any
objections.

[brettw, 2014-09-17 21:19:13]

brettw@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ brettw@chromium.org

[brettw, 2014-09-17 21:19:14]

Don't add me, I'm not doing much pepper reviews any more.

[sky, 2014-09-17 21:53:35]

sky@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ viettrungluu@chromium.org, yzshen@chromium.org

[sky, 2014-09-17 21:53:35]

+yzshen
+viettrunglu
does this list make sense to you guys?

[yzshen1, 2014-09-17 22:29:05]

On 2014/09/17 21:53:35, sky wrote:
> +yzshen
> +viettrunglu
> does this list make sense to you guys?

Thanks for asking!

I do Pepper review only occasionally. I am not very enthusiastic to be in the
list, but I am okay if people need me to be there.
(I am actually the one who suggested to copy all Pepper OWNERs here.)

[sky, 2014-09-17 22:35:16]

Ok, I'm LGTMing then. Anyone that doesn't want to be in the OWNERs file can
remove themself.

[elijahtaylor1, 2014-09-17 22:39:53]

On 2014/09/17 22:35:16, sky wrote:
> Ok, I'm LGTMing then. Anyone that doesn't want to be in the OWNERs file can
> remove themself.

I think I need an LGTM by itself per the new rules

[elijahtaylor1, 2014-09-19 00:33:06]

On 2014/09/17 22:39:53, elijahtaylor1 wrote:
> On 2014/09/17 22:35:16, sky wrote:
> > Ok, I'm LGTMing then. Anyone that doesn't want to be in the OWNERs file can
> > remove themself.
> 
> I think I need an LGTM by itself per the new rules

sky: ping

[sky, 2014-09-19 02:53:54]

I thought my earlier LGTM covered it. Looks like not.

[elijahtaylor1, 2014-09-19 16:52:14]

The CQ bit was checked by elijahtaylor@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-09-19 16:53:29]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/patch-status/575193002/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-09-19 17:28:13]

Committed patchset #2 (id:20001) as 5a2d522083b7846a619ded4a244c172f8a167b49

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-09-19 17:28:48]

Patchset 2 (id:??) landed as
https://crrev.com/6393bc127b79cc3445014cf8ffb46cde14e43316
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#295724}