Temporary revert: Introduce include directive to make_private_script_source.py

Temporary revert: Introduce include directive to make_private_script_source.py

Reason: As discussed with @haraken over IRC, we need to migrate to using chromium
resource, grd, system. In that we may need to think over how to use the include directive.

One of the harmony modules, [1], describes about using the 'import "module-name"' directive.
We could consider using that as well. As this needs some discussion, we decided to revert
this patch first and reconsider landing this once the formal decision is made about it.

R=haraken@chromium.org, yosin@chromium.org

[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/import

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=181640

[vivekg, 2014-09-09 10:45:27]

vivekg@chromium.org changed reviewers:
+ vivekg@chromium.org

[vivekg, 2014-09-09 10:45:28]

PTAL, thanks!

[haraken, 2014-09-09 10:48:05]

LGTM

The current <include> rule is preventing us from implementing a GRD system for
private scripts. We can revert it at the moment and land the GRD system. We can
get back to the include syntax after that.

[vivekg, 2014-09-09 11:52:24]

The CQ bit was checked by vivekg@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-09-09 11:53:13]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/vivek.vg@samsung.com/559493002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-09-09 12:52:47]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as 181640

[haraken, 2014-09-10 02:07:27]

vivekg@: Do you have any timeline on implementing the GRD system? yosin@ is
waiting for the <include> syntax :)

[vivekg, 2014-09-10 02:12:15]

On 2014/09/10 02:07:27, haraken wrote:
> vivekg@: Do you have any timeline on implementing the GRD system? yosin@ is
> waiting for the <include> syntax :)

I am on my way to office and will submit the patch for review in another 1 hours
time. Is that ok?

[haraken, 2014-09-10 02:23:23]

On 2014/09/10 02:12:15, vivekg_ wrote:
> On 2014/09/10 02:07:27, haraken wrote:
> > vivekg@: Do you have any timeline on implementing the GRD system? yosin@ is
> > waiting for the <include> syntax :)
> 
> I am on my way to office and will submit the patch for review in another 1
hours
> time. Is that ok?

That's too quick :)