LayoutTests/virtual/web-animations-css/animations/interpolation/border-image-outset-interpolation-expected.txt - Issue 54123007: Web Animations CSS: Fix clamping to non-negative values for BorderImageLength

Unified Diff: LayoutTests/virtual/web-animations-css/animations/interpolation/border-image-outset-interpolation-expected.txt

Issue 54123007: Web Animations CSS: Fix clamping to non-negative values for BorderImageLength (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/blink/trunk

Patch Set: Rebased after addition of BorderImageLengthBox Created 7 years, 1 month ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

View side-by-side diff with in-line comments

Download patch

« no previous file with comments | « LayoutTests/animations/interpolation/webkit-mask-box-image-width-interpolation-expected.txt ('k') | LayoutTests/virtual/web-animations-css/animations/interpolation/border-image-width-interpolation-expected.txt » ('j') | LayoutTests/virtual/web-animations-css/animations/interpolation/border-image-width-interpolation-expected.txt » ('J')
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Hide Comments ('s')

Index: LayoutTests/virtual/web-animations-css/animations/interpolation/border-image-outset-interpolation-expected.txt

diff --git a/LayoutTests/virtual/web-animations-css/animations/interpolation/border-image-outset-interpolation-expected.txt b/LayoutTests/virtual/web-animations-css/animations/interpolation/border-image-outset-interpolation-expected.txt

index 6fbcc8cc23d4b781dc2910bb3c041a576425919d..003c476e921a613fbdfce0a48b328fc033a18742 100644

--- a/LayoutTests/virtual/web-animations-css/animations/interpolation/border-image-outset-interpolation-expected.txt

+++ b/LayoutTests/virtual/web-animations-css/animations/interpolation/border-image-outset-interpolation-expected.txt

@@ -12,4 +12,18 @@ PASS: border-image-outset from [0px] to [5px] was [4.5px] at 0.9

PASS: border-image-outset from [0px] to [5px] was [5px] at 1

PASS: border-image-outset from [0px] to [5px] was [7.5px] at 1.5

PASS: border-image-outset from [0px] to [5px] was [50px] at 10

+PASS: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [0] at -0.3

+PASS: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [0] at 0

+FAIL: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [0] at 0.1, expected [0.5]

Steve Block 2013/11/13 05:23:12 This looks like a bug to me. Note that the legacy

alancutter (OOO until 2018) 2013/11/13 07:48:27 I wonder if this is due to the clampTo call added

Steve Block 2013/11/13 08:50:44 Good catch, you're right - it was picking up the w

+PASS: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [1] at 0.2

+FAIL: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [1] at 0.3, expected [1.5]

+PASS: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [2] at 0.4

+FAIL: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [2] at 0.5, expected [2.5]

+PASS: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [3] at 0.6

+FAIL: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [3] at 0.7, expected [3.5]

+PASS: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [4] at 0.8

+FAIL: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [4] at 0.9, expected [4.5]

+PASS: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [5] at 1

+FAIL: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [7] at 1.5, expected [7.5]

+PASS: border-image-outset from [0] to [5] was [50] at 10