Chromium Code Reviews| Index: ui/base/resource/resource_bundle_unittest.cc |
| diff --git a/ui/base/resource/resource_bundle_unittest.cc b/ui/base/resource/resource_bundle_unittest.cc |
| index 7e7567b2fbe53ee03074cf2b1e28c6dfa1ddb4dd..91384762cee9f306126c151fbb9521d50d4ab057 100644 |
| --- a/ui/base/resource/resource_bundle_unittest.cc |
| +++ b/ui/base/resource/resource_bundle_unittest.cc |
| @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ TEST_F(ResourceBundleTest, DelegateGetPathForResourcePack) { |
| Property(&base::FilePath::value, pack_path.value()), |
| pack_scale_factor)) |
| .Times(1) |
| - .WillOnce(Return(pack_path)); |
| + .WillOnce(Return(base::FilePath())); |
|
tony
2014/09/04 22:55:48
Why did this change?
Avi (use Gerrit)
2014/09/04 23:02:51
This unit test is testing that the delegate will g
|
| resource_bundle->AddDataPackFromPath(pack_path, pack_scale_factor); |
| } |
| @@ -414,7 +414,6 @@ class ResourceBundleImageTest : public ResourceBundleTest { |
| }; |
| // Verify that we don't crash when trying to load a resource that is not found. |
| -// In some cases, we fail to mmap resources.pak, but try to keep going anyway. |
| TEST_F(ResourceBundleImageTest, LoadDataResourceBytes) { |
| base::FilePath data_path = dir_path().Append(FILE_PATH_LITERAL("sample.pak")); |
| @@ -429,13 +428,6 @@ TEST_F(ResourceBundleImageTest, LoadDataResourceBytes) { |
| const int kUnfoundResourceId = 10000; |
| EXPECT_EQ(NULL, resource_bundle->LoadDataResourceBytes( |
| kUnfoundResourceId)); |
| - |
| - // Give a .pak file that doesn't exist so we will fail to load it. |
| - resource_bundle->AddDataPackFromPath( |
| - base::FilePath(FILE_PATH_LITERAL("non-existant-file.pak")), |
| - ui::SCALE_FACTOR_NONE); |
| - EXPECT_EQ(NULL, resource_bundle->LoadDataResourceBytes( |
| - kUnfoundResourceId)); |
| } |
| TEST_F(ResourceBundleImageTest, GetRawDataResource) { |