| Index: pkg/analysis_server/tool/spec/spec_input.html
|
| diff --git a/pkg/analysis_server/tool/spec/spec_input.html b/pkg/analysis_server/tool/spec/spec_input.html
|
| index 48a5ff2d4c5dde856048f4aa8104ccb3c7e0eb84..11f90e2b7b7e71eec60a4aec0126780804e61f13 100644
|
| --- a/pkg/analysis_server/tool/spec/spec_input.html
|
| +++ b/pkg/analysis_server/tool/spec/spec_input.html
|
| @@ -2591,8 +2591,12 @@
|
| An error occurred during the processing of an
|
| "analysis.getErrors" request.
|
| </p>
|
| - <!-- TODO(paulberry): this is vague. We should be more
|
| - specific about the nature of the error if we can. -->
|
| + <p>
|
| + This is a legacy error; it will be removed before the
|
| + API reaches version 1.0.
|
| + </p>
|
| + <!-- TODO(paulberry): remove this error and the code that
|
| + generates it. -->
|
| </value>
|
| <value>
|
| <code>INVALID_PARAMETER</code>
|
| @@ -2608,21 +2612,28 @@
|
| </value>
|
| <value>
|
| <code>SERVER_ALREADY_STARTED</code>
|
| - <!-- TODO(paulberry): this error code doesn't make sense
|
| - anymore. -->
|
| <p>
|
| The analysis server has already been started (and hence
|
| won't accept new connections).
|
| </p>
|
| + <p>
|
| + This error is included for future expansion; at present
|
| + the analysis server can only speak to one client at a
|
| + time so this error will never occur.
|
| + </p>
|
| </value>
|
| <value>
|
| <code>UNANALYZED_PRIORITY_FILES</code>
|
| - <!-- TODO(paulberry): this error shouldn't be issued under
|
| - our new "eventual consistency" model. -->
|
| <p>
|
| An "analysis.setPriorityFiles" request includes one or
|
| more files that are not being analyzed.
|
| </p>
|
| + <p>
|
| + This is a legacy error; it will be removed before the
|
| + API reaches version 1.0.
|
| + </p>
|
| + <!-- TODO(paulberry): remove this error and the code that
|
| + generates it. -->
|
| </value>
|
| <value>
|
| <code>UNKNOWN_REQUEST</code>
|
| @@ -2638,8 +2649,12 @@
|
| The analysis server was requested to perform an action
|
| which is not supported.
|
| </p>
|
| - <!-- TODO(paulberry): how does this differ from
|
| - UNKNOWN_REQUEST? Do we really need both? -->
|
| + <p>
|
| + This is a legacy error; it will be removed before the
|
| + API reaches version 1.0.
|
| + </p>
|
| + <!-- TODO(paulberry): remove this error and the code that
|
| + generates it. -->
|
| </value>
|
| </enum>
|
| </type>
|
|
|