Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(3)

Unified Diff: cc/resources/gpu_raster_worker_pool.cc

Issue 523243002: cc: Generalize raster task notifications (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Remove obsolete HasPendingTasks Created 6 years, 3 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: cc/resources/gpu_raster_worker_pool.cc
diff --git a/cc/resources/gpu_raster_worker_pool.cc b/cc/resources/gpu_raster_worker_pool.cc
index 36d62aad8a195ecdb2cad7f75df0f25d6fd48ee0..ba37c328061eac051fa2e1d978cc946504cfce71 100644
--- a/cc/resources/gpu_raster_worker_pool.cc
+++ b/cc/resources/gpu_raster_worker_pool.cc
@@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ GpuRasterWorkerPool::GpuRasterWorkerPool(base::SequencedTaskRunner* task_runner,
context_provider_(context_provider),
resource_provider_(resource_provider),
run_tasks_on_origin_thread_pending_(false),
- raster_tasks_pending_(false),
- raster_tasks_required_for_activation_pending_(false),
raster_finished_weak_ptr_factory_(this),
weak_ptr_factory_(this) {
DCHECK(context_provider_);
@@ -62,14 +60,7 @@ void GpuRasterWorkerPool::Shutdown() {
void GpuRasterWorkerPool::ScheduleTasks(RasterTaskQueue* queue) {
TRACE_EVENT0("cc", "GpuRasterWorkerPool::ScheduleTasks");
- DCHECK_EQ(queue->required_for_activation_count,
- static_cast<size_t>(
- std::count_if(queue->items.begin(),
- queue->items.end(),
- RasterTaskQueue::Item::IsRequiredForActivation)));
-
- raster_tasks_pending_ = true;
- raster_tasks_required_for_activation_pending_ = true;
+ raster_task_sets_pending_.set();
reveman 2014/09/10 16:41:49 is it worth adding a comment here that makes it cl
ernstm 2014/09/10 18:26:18 Done.
unsigned priority = kRasterTaskPriorityBase;
@@ -78,19 +69,22 @@ void GpuRasterWorkerPool::ScheduleTasks(RasterTaskQueue* queue) {
// Cancel existing OnRasterFinished callbacks.
raster_finished_weak_ptr_factory_.InvalidateWeakPtrs();
- scoped_refptr<RasterizerTask>
- new_raster_required_for_activation_finished_task(
- CreateRasterRequiredForActivationFinishedTask(
- queue->required_for_activation_count,
- task_runner_.get(),
- base::Bind(
- &GpuRasterWorkerPool::OnRasterRequiredForActivationFinished,
- raster_finished_weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr())));
- scoped_refptr<RasterizerTask> new_raster_finished_task(
- CreateRasterFinishedTask(
- task_runner_.get(),
- base::Bind(&GpuRasterWorkerPool::OnRasterFinished,
- raster_finished_weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr())));
+ scoped_refptr<RasterizerTask> new_task_set_finished_tasks[kNumberOfTaskSets];
+
+ TaskSetSizes task_set_sizes(queue);
reveman 2014/09/10 16:41:49 We wouldn't need this if not for the synthetic del
ernstm 2014/09/10 18:26:18 I'd prefer to do this as a follow-up.
reveman 2014/09/10 19:41:27 I have to insist on doing this prior to this patch
ernstm 2014/09/10 20:48:06 Could we simply put the delay into the REQUIRED _F
reveman 2014/09/10 21:00:52 I don't think so. That will cause us to block on t
+
+ for (TaskSet task_set = 0; task_set < kNumberOfTaskSets; ++task_set) {
+ base::debug::TraceEventSyntheticDelay* synthetic_delay = NULL;
+ if (task_set_sizes[task_set] > 0)
+ synthetic_delay = client_->SyntheticDelayForTaskSet(task_set);
+
+ new_task_set_finished_tasks[task_set] = CreateRasterFinishedTask(
+ task_runner_.get(),
+ base::Bind(&GpuRasterWorkerPool::OnRasterTaskSetFinished,
+ raster_finished_weak_ptr_factory_.GetWeakPtr(),
+ task_set),
+ synthetic_delay);
+ }
for (RasterTaskQueue::Item::Vector::const_iterator it = queue->items.begin();
it != queue->items.end();
@@ -99,34 +93,31 @@ void GpuRasterWorkerPool::ScheduleTasks(RasterTaskQueue* queue) {
RasterTask* task = item.task;
DCHECK(!task->HasCompleted());
- if (item.required_for_activation) {
- graph_.edges.push_back(TaskGraph::Edge(
- task, new_raster_required_for_activation_finished_task.get()));
+ for (TaskSet task_set = 0; task_set < kNumberOfTaskSets; task_set++) {
+ if (!it->task_sets[task_set])
reveman 2014/09/10 16:41:49 use item.task_sets instead of it->task_sets
ernstm 2014/09/10 18:26:18 Done.
+ continue;
+
+ graph_.edges.push_back(
+ TaskGraph::Edge(task, new_task_set_finished_tasks[task_set].get()));
}
InsertNodesForRasterTask(&graph_, task, task->dependencies(), priority++);
-
- graph_.edges.push_back(
- TaskGraph::Edge(task, new_raster_finished_task.get()));
}
- InsertNodeForTask(&graph_,
- new_raster_required_for_activation_finished_task.get(),
- kRasterRequiredForActivationFinishedTaskPriority,
- queue->required_for_activation_count);
- InsertNodeForTask(&graph_,
- new_raster_finished_task.get(),
- kRasterFinishedTaskPriority,
- queue->items.size());
+ for (TaskSet task_set = 0; task_set < kNumberOfTaskSets; task_set++) {
+ InsertNodeForTask(&graph_,
+ new_task_set_finished_tasks[task_set].get(),
+ kRasterTaskSetFinishedTaskPriority,
+ task_set_sizes[task_set]);
+ }
ScheduleTasksOnOriginThread(this, &graph_);
task_graph_runner_->ScheduleTasks(namespace_token_, &graph_);
ScheduleRunTasksOnOriginThread();
- raster_finished_task_ = new_raster_finished_task;
- raster_required_for_activation_finished_task_ =
- new_raster_required_for_activation_finished_task;
+ for (TaskSet task_set = 0; task_set < kNumberOfTaskSets; task_set++)
+ task_set_finished_tasks_[task_set] = new_task_set_finished_tasks[task_set];
reveman 2014/09/10 16:41:49 Maybe have |task_set_finished_tasks_| be a std::ve
ernstm 2014/09/10 18:26:18 We can use std::copy on two arrays as well. I like
reveman 2014/09/10 19:41:27 Great. I didn't know std::copy worked with plain o
}
void GpuRasterWorkerPool::CheckForCompletedTasks() {
@@ -156,21 +147,15 @@ void GpuRasterWorkerPool::ReleaseBufferForRaster(RasterTask* task) {
resource_provider_->ReleaseGpuRasterBuffer(task->resource()->id());
}
-void GpuRasterWorkerPool::OnRasterFinished() {
- TRACE_EVENT0("cc", "GpuRasterWorkerPool::OnRasterFinished");
-
- DCHECK(raster_tasks_pending_);
- raster_tasks_pending_ = false;
- client_->DidFinishRunningTasks();
-}
-
-void GpuRasterWorkerPool::OnRasterRequiredForActivationFinished() {
- TRACE_EVENT0("cc",
- "GpuRasterWorkerPool::OnRasterRequiredForActivationFinished");
+void GpuRasterWorkerPool::OnRasterTaskSetFinished(TaskSet task_set) {
+ TRACE_EVENT1("cc",
+ "GpuRasterWorkerPool::OnRasterTaskSetFinished",
+ "task_set",
+ task_set);
- DCHECK(raster_tasks_required_for_activation_pending_);
- raster_tasks_required_for_activation_pending_ = false;
- client_->DidFinishRunningTasksRequiredForActivation();
+ DCHECK(raster_task_sets_pending_[task_set]);
+ raster_task_sets_pending_[task_set] = false;
+ client_->DidFinishRunningTaskSet(task_set);
}
void GpuRasterWorkerPool::ScheduleRunTasksOnOriginThread() {

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698