Index: LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/unregister.html |
diff --git a/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/unregister.html b/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/unregister.html |
index ae3bcae6ea185f0c1e36c7225a8d0a9e8e5bec45..d236119424866e002796a080de4bdc761456492b 100644 |
--- a/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/unregister.html |
+++ b/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/unregister.html |
@@ -28,8 +28,10 @@ async_test(function(t) { |
return registration.unregister(); |
}) |
.then(function(value) { |
- assert_equals(value, undefined, |
- 'unregistering twice should resolve with no value'); |
+ // FIXME: This value must be false in spec, but this is not supported now. |
nhiroki
2014/09/01 08:43:03
Can you wrap this at 80 columns?
|
+ // See: https://crbug.com/390894#c16 |
+ assert_equals(value, true, |
+ 'unregistering twice should resolve with false, but now this will be true'); |
nhiroki
2014/09/01 08:43:03
ditto.
(IMHO, just "unregistering twice should re
|
t.done(); |
}) |
.catch(unreached_rejection(t)); |
@@ -43,8 +45,8 @@ async_test(function(t) { |
return registration.unregister(); |
}) |
.then(function(value) { |
- assert_equals(value, undefined, |
- 'unregistration should resolve with no value'); |
+ assert_equals(value, true, |
+ 'unregistration should resolve with true'); |
t.done(); |
}) |
.catch(unreached_rejection(t)); |
@@ -65,7 +67,7 @@ async_test(function(t) { |
return navigator.serviceWorker.unregister(); |
}) |
.then(function(value) { |
- assert_equals(value, undefined, |
+ assert_equals(value, true, |
'unregister with default scope should succeed'); |
return state_promise; |
}) |