| Index: test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py
|
| ===================================================================
|
| --- test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py (revision 1965)
|
| +++ test/analyzer/gyptest-analyzer.py (working copy)
|
| @@ -10,17 +10,20 @@
|
| import TestGyp
|
|
|
| found = 'Found dependency'
|
| +found_all = 'Found dependency (all)'
|
| not_found = 'No dependencies'
|
|
|
|
|
| -def _CreateTestFile(files, targets):
|
| +def _CreateConfigFile(files, targets):
|
| + """Creates the analyzer conflig file, which is used as the input to analyzer.
|
| + See description of analyzer.py for description of the arguments."""
|
| f = open('test_file', 'w')
|
| to_write = {'files': files, 'targets': targets }
|
| json.dump(to_write, f)
|
| f.close()
|
|
|
|
|
| -def _CreateBogusTestFile():
|
| +def _CreateBogusConfigFile():
|
| f = open('test_file','w')
|
| f.write('bogus')
|
| f.close()
|
| @@ -37,22 +40,36 @@
|
| # over a bug in pylint (E1002).
|
| test = TestGyp.TestGypCustom(format='analyzer')
|
|
|
| +def CommonArgs():
|
| + return ('-Gconfig_path=test_file',
|
| + '-Ganalyzer_output_path=analyzer_output')
|
|
|
| +
|
| def run_analyzer(*args, **kw):
|
| """Runs the test specifying a particular config and output path."""
|
| - args += ('-Gconfig_path=test_file',
|
| - '-Ganalyzer_output_path=analyzer_output')
|
| + args += CommonArgs()
|
| test.run_gyp('test.gyp', *args, **kw)
|
|
|
|
|
| def run_analyzer2(*args, **kw):
|
| - """Runs the test specifying a particular config and output path."""
|
| - args += ('-Gconfig_path=test_file',
|
| - '-Ganalyzer_output_path=analyzer_output')
|
| + """Same as run_analyzer(), but passes in test2.gyp instead of test.gyp."""
|
| + args += CommonArgs()
|
| test.run_gyp('test2.gyp', *args, **kw)
|
|
|
|
|
| -def EnsureContains(targets=set(), matched=False):
|
| +def run_analyzer3(*args, **kw):
|
| + """Same as run_analyzer(), but passes in test3.gyp instead of test.gyp."""
|
| + args += CommonArgs()
|
| + test.run_gyp('test3.gyp', *args, **kw)
|
| +
|
| +
|
| +def run_analyzer4(*args, **kw):
|
| + """Same as run_analyzer(), but passes in test3.gyp instead of test.gyp."""
|
| + args += CommonArgs()
|
| + test.run_gyp('test4.gyp', *args, **kw)
|
| +
|
| +
|
| +def EnsureContains(targets=set(), matched=False, build_targets=set()):
|
| """Verifies output contains |targets|."""
|
| result = _ReadOutputFileContents()
|
| if result.get('error', None):
|
| @@ -68,6 +85,12 @@
|
| print 'actual targets:', actual_targets, '\nexpected targets:', targets
|
| test.fail_test()
|
|
|
| + actual_build_targets = set(result['build_targets'])
|
| + if actual_build_targets != build_targets:
|
| + print 'actual build_targets:', actual_build_targets, \
|
| + '\nexpected build_targets:', build_targets
|
| + test.fail_test()
|
| +
|
| if matched and result['status'] != found:
|
| print 'expected', found, 'got', result['status']
|
| test.fail_test()
|
| @@ -76,6 +99,26 @@
|
| test.fail_test()
|
|
|
|
|
| +def EnsureMatchedAll(targets):
|
| + result = _ReadOutputFileContents()
|
| + if result.get('error', None):
|
| + print 'unexpected error', result.get('error')
|
| + test.fail_test()
|
| +
|
| + if result.get('warning', None):
|
| + print 'unexpected warning', result.get('warning')
|
| + test.fail_test()
|
| +
|
| + if result['status'] != found_all:
|
| + print 'expected', found_all, 'got', result['status']
|
| + test.fail_test()
|
| +
|
| + actual_targets = set(result['targets'])
|
| + if actual_targets != targets:
|
| + print 'actual targets:', actual_targets, '\nexpected targets:', targets
|
| + test.fail_test()
|
| +
|
| +
|
| def EnsureError(expected_error_string):
|
| """Verifies output contains the error string."""
|
| result = _ReadOutputFileContents()
|
| @@ -100,7 +143,6 @@
|
| '\nexpected warning:', expected_warning_string
|
| test.fail_test()
|
|
|
| -
|
| # Verifies config_path must be specified.
|
| test.run_gyp('test.gyp')
|
| EnsureStdoutContains('Must specify files to analyze via config_path')
|
| @@ -110,133 +152,204 @@
|
| '-Ganalyzer_output_path=analyzer_output')
|
| EnsureError('Unable to open file bogus_file')
|
|
|
| -# Verify get error when bad target is specified.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['exe2.c'], ['bad_target'])
|
| +# Verify get warning when bad target is specified.
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['bad_target'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureWarning('Unable to find all targets')
|
|
|
| # Verifies config_path must point to a valid json file.
|
| -_CreateBogusTestFile()
|
| +_CreateBogusConfigFile()
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureError('Unable to parse config file test_file')
|
|
|
| # Trivial test of a source.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['foo.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Conditional source that is excluded.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['conditional_source.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=False)
|
|
|
| # Conditional source that is included by way of argument.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['conditional_source.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['conditional_source.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer('-Dtest_variable=1')
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Two unknown files.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['unknown1.c', 'unoknow2.cc'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'unoknow2.cc'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains()
|
|
|
| # Two unknown files.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_sourcex.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_sourcex.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains()
|
|
|
| # Included dependency
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_source.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['unknown1.c', 'subdir/subdir_source.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| # Included inputs to actions.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['action_input.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['action_input.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Don't consider outputs.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['action_output.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['action_output.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=False)
|
|
|
| # Rule inputs.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['rule_input.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['rule_input.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Ignore path specified with PRODUCT_DIR.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['product_dir_input.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['product_dir_input.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| EnsureContains(matched=False)
|
|
|
| # Path specified via a variable.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['subdir/subdir_source2.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source2.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Verifies paths with // are fixed up correctly.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['parent_source.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['parent_source.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| # Verifies relative paths are resolved correctly.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['subdir/subdir_source.h'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir_source.h'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| # Various permutations when passing in targets.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe', 'exe3'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe', 'exe3'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe3'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe3'}, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| # Verifies duplicates are ignored.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe', 'exe'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c', 'subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe', 'exe'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['exe2.c'], ['exe'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], ['exe'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['exe2.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c', 'exe2.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c', 'exe2.c'], [])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['exe2.c'], [])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir/subdir2b_source.c'], ['exe3'])
|
| run_analyzer()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True)
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe3'}, build_targets={'exe3'})
|
|
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['exe2.c'], [])
|
| +run_analyzer()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe2'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['foo.c'], [])
|
| +run_analyzer()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'exe'})
|
| +
|
| # Assertions when modifying build (gyp/gypi) files, especially when said files
|
| # are included.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['subdir2/d.cc'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/d.cc'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| run_analyzer2()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'foo'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'foo'}, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['subdir2/subdir.includes.gypi'],
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/subdir.includes.gypi'],
|
| ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| run_analyzer2()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'foo'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'foo'}, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['subdir2/subdir.gyp'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['subdir2/subdir.gyp'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| run_analyzer2()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'foo'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'foo'}, build_targets={'exe'})
|
|
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['test2.includes.gypi'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['test2.includes.gypi'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| run_analyzer2()
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'exe2', 'exe3'},
|
| + build_targets={'exe', 'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| # Verify modifying a file included makes all targets dirty.
|
| -_CreateTestFile(['common.gypi'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['common.gypi'], ['exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'])
|
| run_analyzer2('-Icommon.gypi')
|
| -EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'exe', 'foo', 'exe2', 'exe3'})
|
| +EnsureMatchedAll({'exe', 'exe2', 'foo', 'exe3'})
|
|
|
| +# Assertions from test3.gyp.
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c', 'f.c'], ['a'])
|
| +run_analyzer3()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a'])
|
| +run_analyzer3()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], [])
|
| +run_analyzer3()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['c.c', 'e.c'], [])
|
| +run_analyzer3()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a'])
|
| +run_analyzer3()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'b'])
|
| +run_analyzer3()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a', 'b'])
|
| +run_analyzer3()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], ['a', 'b'])
|
| +run_analyzer3()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a', 'b'}, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], ['a'])
|
| +run_analyzer3()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], ['a'])
|
| +run_analyzer3()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, targets={'a'}, build_targets={'a'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['a.c'], [])
|
| +run_analyzer3()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], [])
|
| +run_analyzer3()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a', 'b'})
|
| +
|
| +# Assertions around test4.gyp.
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['f.c'], [])
|
| +run_analyzer4()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'e'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['d.c'], [])
|
| +run_analyzer4()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'a'})
|
| +
|
| +_CreateConfigFile(['i.c'], [])
|
| +run_analyzer4()
|
| +EnsureContains(matched=True, build_targets={'h'})
|
| +
|
| test.pass_test()
|
|
|