Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(405)

Unified Diff: LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/serviceworkerglobalscope-scope.html

Issue 466723002: ServiceWorker: Enable ServiceWorkerRegistration and update layout tests (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink.git@updatefound
Patch Set: update comments in service-worker-gc.html Created 6 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/serviceworkerglobalscope-scope.html
diff --git a/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/serviceworkerglobalscope-scope.html b/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/serviceworkerglobalscope-scope.html
index 397e2f52d0236b5d0bafa2613a98973b90b5ad03..d1ada0b0b8c404e4b544e939fa8e6cfa9bcbe2c6 100644
--- a/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/serviceworkerglobalscope-scope.html
+++ b/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/serviceworkerglobalscope-scope.html
@@ -4,32 +4,50 @@
<script src="../resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>
<script src="resources/test-helpers.js"></script>
<script>
-
function scope_test(name, scope) {
- var t = async_test('Verify the scope property: ' + name);
+ var registration;
falken 2014/08/14 14:23:15 can you move this down to be the same scope as exp
nhiroki 2014/08/14 16:37:54 Done.
+ var t = async_test('Verify the scope property: ' + name);
t.step(function() {
- var expectedScope, options;
- if (scope) {
- expectedScope = new URL(scope, document.location).toString();
- } else {
- expectedScope = new URL('/', document.location).toString();
- }
+ var expectedScope, options;
falken 2014/08/14 14:23:15 indent
nhiroki 2014/08/14 16:37:54 Done.
+ if (scope) {
+ expectedScope = new URL(scope, document.location).toString();
+ } else {
+ expectedScope = new URL('/', document.location).toString();
+ }
+
+ service_worker_unregister_and_register(
+ t, 'resources/serviceworkerglobalscope-scope-worker.js', scope)
+ .then(function(r) {
+ registration = r;
+ assert_equals(registration.waiting, null,
+ 'registration.waiting should be null');
+ assert_equals(registration.active, null,
+ 'registration.active should be null');
+ assert_equals(registration.installing, null,
+ 'registration.installing should be null');
+ return wait_for_update(t, registration);
+ })
+ .then(function(worker) {
+ assert_equals(registration.waiting, null,
+ 'registration.waiting should be null');
+ assert_equals(registration.active, null,
+ 'registration.active should be null');
+ assert_equals(registration.installing, worker,
+ 'registration.installing should not be null');
- service_worker_unregister_and_register(
- t, 'resources/serviceworkerglobalscope-scope-worker.js', scope
- ).then(
- t.step_func(function(worker) {
- var messageChannel = new MessageChannel();
- messageChannel.port1.onmessage = t.step_func(function(e) {
- message = e.data;
- assert_equals(message.initialScope, expectedScope, 'Worker should see the scope on eval.');
- assert_equals(message.currentScope, expectedScope, 'Worker scope should not change.');
- service_worker_unregister_and_done(t, scope);
- });
- worker.postMessage('', [messageChannel.port2]);
- })
- );
+ var messageChannel = new MessageChannel();
+ messageChannel.port1.onmessage = t.step_func(function(e) {
falken 2014/08/14 14:23:15 Would it be better to promisify this? return ne
nhiroki 2014/08/14 16:37:54 Done.
+ var message = e.data;
+ assert_equals(message.initialScope, expectedScope,
+ 'Worker should see the scope on eval.');
+ assert_equals(message.currentScope, expectedScope,
+ 'Worker scope should not change.');
+ service_worker_unregister_and_done(t, scope);
+ });
+ worker.postMessage('', [messageChannel.port2]);
+ })
+ .catch(unreached_rejection(t));
});
}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698