Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(193)

Unified Diff: net/cert/ct_ev_whitelist_unittest.cc

Issue 462543002: Certificate Transparency: Code for unpacking EV cert hashes whitelist (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Review comments & linting Created 6 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: net/cert/ct_ev_whitelist_unittest.cc
diff --git a/net/cert/ct_ev_whitelist_unittest.cc b/net/cert/ct_ev_whitelist_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..16c9b95042c778b548fb74a228bd787517fa4043
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/cert/ct_ev_whitelist_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "net/cert/ct_ev_whitelist.h"
+
+#include <string>
+
+#include "base/base64.h"
+#include "base/strings/stringprintf.h"
wtc 2014/08/20 02:52:07 I don't think we need these two headers.
Eran Messeri 2014/09/02 12:20:23 Done.
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace net {
+
+namespace ct {
+
+namespace internal {
+
+const char kSomeData[] = {0xd5, 0xe2, 0xaf, 0xe5, 0xbb, 0x10, 0x7c, 0xd1};
+
+TEST(BitStreamReaderTest, CanReadSingleByte) {
+ BitStreamReader reader(kSomeData, 1);
+ uint64 v(0);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(8u, reader.BitsLeft());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(reader.ReadBits(8, &v));
+ ASSERT_EQ(static_cast<uint64>(0xd5), v);
+
+ ASSERT_FALSE(reader.ReadBits(1, &v));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0u, reader.BitsLeft());
+}
+
+TEST(BitStreamReaderTest, CanReadSingleBits) {
+ const uint64 expected_bits[] = {1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1,
+ 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0};
+ BitStreamReader reader(kSomeData, 2);
+ ASSERT_EQ(16u, reader.BitsLeft());
+ uint64 v(0);
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(reader.ReadBits(1, &v));
+ ASSERT_EQ(expected_bits[i], v);
+ }
+ ASSERT_EQ(0u, reader.BitsLeft());
+}
+
+TEST(BitStreamReaderTest, CanReadBitGroups) {
+ BitStreamReader reader(kSomeData, 3);
+ ASSERT_EQ(24u, reader.BitsLeft());
+ uint64 v(0);
+ uint64 res(0);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(reader.ReadBits(5, &v));
+ res |= v << 19;
+ ASSERT_EQ(19u, reader.BitsLeft());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(reader.ReadBits(13, &v));
+ res |= v << 6;
+ ASSERT_EQ(6u, reader.BitsLeft());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(reader.ReadBits(6, &v));
+ res |= v;
+ ASSERT_EQ(static_cast<uint64>(0xd5e2af), res);
+
+ ASSERT_FALSE(reader.ReadBits(1, &v));
+}
+
+TEST(BitStreamReaderTest, CanRead64Bit) {
+ BitStreamReader reader(kSomeData, 8);
+ ASSERT_EQ(64u, reader.BitsLeft());
+ uint64 v(0);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(reader.ReadBits(64, &v));
+ ASSERT_EQ(static_cast<uint64>(0xd5e2afe5bb107cd1), v);
wtc 2014/08/20 02:52:07 I think there is some GG_UINT64_C macro (or someth
Eran Messeri 2014/09/02 12:20:23 Done, switched to using UINT64_C (GG_UINT64_C is d
+}
+
+TEST(BitStreamReaderTest, CanReadUnaryEncodedNumbers) {
+ BitStreamReader reader(kSomeData, 3);
+ const uint64 expected_values[] = {2, 1, 1, 4, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1};
+ uint64 v(0);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 9; ++i) {
wtc 2014/08/20 02:52:08 There are still four 1 bits (the 'f' in 0xaf). Sho
Eran Messeri 2014/09/02 12:20:23 Done. Adding this test case indeed uncovered the p
+ ASSERT_TRUE(reader.ReadUnaryEncoding(&v));
+ ASSERT_EQ(expected_values[i], v) << "Expected " << expected_values[i]
+ << " but was " << v << " at position "
+ << i;
wtc 2014/08/20 02:52:08 Nit: I think ASSERT_EQ will automatically print th
Eran Messeri 2014/09/02 12:20:23 Done.
+ }
+}
+
+} // namespace internal
+
+const char kFirstHash[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0xd7, 0xfc, 0x18, 0x02, 0xcb};
+// Second hash: Diff from first hash is > 2^47
+const char kSecondHash[] = {0x00, 0x01, 0x05, 0xd2, 0x58, 0x47, 0xa7, 0xbf};
+// Third hash: Diff from 2nd hash is < 2^47
+const char kThirdHash[] = {0x00, 0x01, 0x48, 0x45, 0x8c, 0x53, 0x03, 0x94};
+
+const char kWhitelistData[] = {
+ 0x00, 0x00, 0x03, 0xd7, 0xfc, 0x18, 0x02, 0xcb, // First hash
+ 0xc0, 0x7e, 0x97, 0x0b, 0xe9, 0x3d, 0x10, 0x9c,
+ 0xcd, 0x02, 0xd6, 0xf5, 0x40,
+};
+
+TEST(CTEVWhitelistTest, UncompressFailsForTooShortList) {
+ // This list does not contain enough bytes even for the first hash.
+ std::set<std::string> res;
+ ASSERT_FALSE(
+ internal::UncompressEVWhitelist(std::string(kWhitelistData, 7), &res));
+}
+
+TEST(CTEVWhitelistTest, UncompressFailsForTruncatedList) {
+ // This list is missing bits for the second part of the diff.
+ std::set<std::string> res;
+ ASSERT_FALSE(
+ internal::UncompressEVWhitelist(std::string(kWhitelistData, 14), &res));
+}
+
+TEST(CTEVWhitelistTest, UncompressesWhitelistCorrectly) {
+ std::set<std::string> res;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(
+ internal::UncompressEVWhitelist(std::string(kWhitelistData, 21), &res));
wtc 2014/08/20 02:52:08 Nit: it may be better to use sizeof(kWhitelistData
Eran Messeri 2014/09/02 12:20:23 Done.
+
+ // Ensure first hash is found
+ ASSERT_TRUE(res.find(std::string(kFirstHash, 8)) != res.end());
+ // Ensure second hash is found
+ ASSERT_TRUE(res.find(std::string(kSecondHash, 8)) != res.end());
+ // Ensure last hash is found
+ ASSERT_TRUE(res.find(std::string(kThirdHash, 8)) != res.end());
wtc 2014/08/20 02:52:08 We should also verify that res.size() is equal to
Eran Messeri 2014/09/02 12:20:23 Done.
+}
+
+TEST(CTEVWhitelistTest, CanFindHashInSetList) {
+}
+
+TEST(CTEVWhitelistTest, CannotFindOldHashAfterSetList) {
+}
wtc 2014/08/20 02:52:08 These two tests are empty!
Eran Messeri 2014/09/02 12:20:23 Eek! My bad, they're implemented in the new patchs
+
+} // namespace ct
+
+} // namespace net

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698