Chromium Code Reviews| OLD | NEW |
|---|---|
| 1 // Copyright 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. | 1 // Copyright 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. |
| 2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be | 2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be |
| 3 // found in the LICENSE file. | 3 // found in the LICENSE file. |
| 4 | 4 |
| 5 package org.chromium.content.browser; | 5 package org.chromium.content.browser; |
| 6 | 6 |
| 7 import android.content.Context; | 7 import android.content.Context; |
| 8 import android.content.res.Resources; | 8 import android.content.res.Resources; |
| 9 import android.graphics.Bitmap; | 9 import android.graphics.Bitmap; |
| 10 import android.graphics.Canvas; | 10 import android.graphics.Canvas; |
| (...skipping 515 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after Loading... | |
| 526 } | 526 } |
| 527 | 527 |
| 528 /** | 528 /** |
| 529 * Returns true if the point is inside the final drawable area for this popu p zoomer. | 529 * Returns true if the point is inside the final drawable area for this popu p zoomer. |
| 530 */ | 530 */ |
| 531 private boolean isTouchOutsideArea(float x, float y) { | 531 private boolean isTouchOutsideArea(float x, float y) { |
| 532 return !mClipRect.contains(x, y); | 532 return !mClipRect.contains(x, y); |
| 533 } | 533 } |
| 534 | 534 |
| 535 @Override | 535 @Override |
| 536 public boolean performClick() { | |
| 537 return super.performClick(); | |
|
aurimas (slooooooooow)
2014/08/12 15:59:44
Why do we need this override? It just calls super.
AKVT
2014/08/12 16:22:40
This is to tackle overrides onTouchEvent but not p
| |
| 538 } | |
| 539 | |
| 540 @Override | |
| 536 public boolean onTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) { | 541 public boolean onTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) { |
| 537 mGestureDetector.onTouchEvent(event); | 542 mGestureDetector.onTouchEvent(event); |
| 543 if (event.getAction() == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP) { | |
| 544 performClick(); | |
|
aurimas (slooooooooow)
2014/08/12 16:30:21
I guess I did not explain it well. Why don't we ca
| |
| 545 } | |
| 538 return true; | 546 return true; |
| 539 } | 547 } |
| 540 | 548 |
| 541 private static class ReverseInterpolator implements Interpolator { | 549 private static class ReverseInterpolator implements Interpolator { |
| 542 private final Interpolator mInterpolator; | 550 private final Interpolator mInterpolator; |
| 543 | 551 |
| 544 public ReverseInterpolator(Interpolator i) { | 552 public ReverseInterpolator(Interpolator i) { |
| 545 mInterpolator = i; | 553 mInterpolator = i; |
| 546 } | 554 } |
| 547 | 555 |
| 548 @Override | 556 @Override |
| 549 public float getInterpolation(float input) { | 557 public float getInterpolation(float input) { |
| 550 input = 1.0f - input; | 558 input = 1.0f - input; |
| 551 if (mInterpolator == null) return input; | 559 if (mInterpolator == null) return input; |
| 552 return mInterpolator.getInterpolation(input); | 560 return mInterpolator.getInterpolation(input); |
| 553 } | 561 } |
| 554 } | 562 } |
| 555 } | 563 } |
| OLD | NEW |